Andrew C Stokes1,2, Anna E Wilson2, Dielle J Lundberg2, Wubin Xie2, Kaitlyn M Berry3, Jessica L Fetterman1,4, Alyssa F Harlow5, Yvette C Cozier5, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis6, Kymberle L Sterling7, Emelia J Benjamin1,4,5, Michael J Blaha1,8, Naomi M Hamburg1,4, Aruni Bhatnagar1,9, Rose Marie Robertson1. 1. American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, TX. 2. Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 4. Evans Department of Medicine and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 6. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. 7. School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Dallas, TX. 8. Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 9. Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Understanding which non-cigarette tobacco products precede smoking in youth across different racial/ethnic groups can inform policies that consider tobacco-related health disparities. METHODS: We used nationally representative, longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study waves 1-4. The sample was a dynamic cohort of cigarette-naïve youth aged 12-17 years. Mixed-effects models were used to assess non-cigarette product (e-cigarette, cigar product, or other product) use with cigarette use over 1-year intervals. RESULTS: Of the 28 788 observations pooled across waves 1-4, respondents were 48.7% non-Hispanic white, 13.9% non-Hispanic black, and 23.1% Hispanic. Odds of cigarette initiation over 1-year follow-up were higher among youth with prior use of e-cigarettes (odds ratio [OR], 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.21-3.45), cigars (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.42-2.80), or other products (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.28-2.14) compared to never users. At the population level, 20.6% of cigarette initiation was attributable to e-cigarette use among white youth and 21.6% among Hispanic youth, while only 3.5% of cigarette initiation was attributable to e-cigarette use among black youth. In contrast, 9.1% of cigarette initiation for black youth was attributable to cigar use compared to only 3.9% for both white and Hispanic youth. CONCLUSIONS: Prior use of e-cigarettes, cigars, and other non-cigarette products were all associated with subsequent cigarette initiation. However, white and Hispanic youth were more likely to initiate cigarettes through e-cigarette use (vs. cigar or other product use), while black youth were more likely to initiate cigarettes through cigar use (vs. e-cigarette or other product use). IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that previous studies on effects of non-cigarette tobacco products may overlook the critical role of cigar products as a pathway into cigarette smoking among US youth, particularly black youth. While our data support the importance of e-cigarette use as a pathway into smoking, regulatory actions aimed at addressing youth e-cigarette use alone may contribute to disparities in black versus white tobacco use and further exacerbate inequities in tobacco-related disease. Thus, contemporary policy development and discourse about the effects of non-cigarette tobacco products on cigarette initiation should consider cigar and other non-cigarette products as well as e-cigarettes.
INTRODUCTION: Understanding which non-cigarette tobacco products precede smoking in youth across different racial/ethnic groups can inform policies that consider tobacco-related health disparities. METHODS: We used nationally representative, longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study waves 1-4. The sample was a dynamic cohort of cigarette-naïve youth aged 12-17 years. Mixed-effects models were used to assess non-cigarette product (e-cigarette, cigar product, or other product) use with cigarette use over 1-year intervals. RESULTS: Of the 28 788 observations pooled across waves 1-4, respondents were 48.7% non-Hispanic white, 13.9% non-Hispanic black, and 23.1% Hispanic. Odds of cigarette initiation over 1-year follow-up were higher among youth with prior use of e-cigarettes (odds ratio [OR], 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.21-3.45), cigars (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.42-2.80), or other products (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.28-2.14) compared to never users. At the population level, 20.6% of cigarette initiation was attributable to e-cigarette use among white youth and 21.6% among Hispanic youth, while only 3.5% of cigarette initiation was attributable to e-cigarette use among black youth. In contrast, 9.1% of cigarette initiation for black youth was attributable to cigar use compared to only 3.9% for both white and Hispanic youth. CONCLUSIONS: Prior use of e-cigarettes, cigars, and other non-cigarette products were all associated with subsequent cigarette initiation. However, white and Hispanic youth were more likely to initiate cigarettes through e-cigarette use (vs. cigar or other product use), while black youth were more likely to initiate cigarettes through cigar use (vs. e-cigarette or other product use). IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that previous studies on effects of non-cigarette tobacco products may overlook the critical role of cigar products as a pathway into cigarette smoking among US youth, particularly black youth. While our data support the importance of e-cigarette use as a pathway into smoking, regulatory actions aimed at addressing youth e-cigarette use alone may contribute to disparities in black versus white tobacco use and further exacerbate inequities in tobacco-related disease. Thus, contemporary policy development and discourse about the effects of non-cigarette tobacco products on cigarette initiation should consider cigar and other non-cigarette products as well as e-cigarettes.
Authors: Hongying Dai; Athena K Ramos; Babalola Faseru; Jennie L Hill; Steven Y Sussman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer L Pearson; Andrew Waa; Kamran Siddiqi; Richard Edwards; Patricia Nez Henderson; Monica Webb Hooper Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Adriana Pérez; Arnold E Kuk; Meagan A Bluestein; Elena Penedo; Roi San N'hpang; Baojiang Chen; Cheryl L Perry; Kymberly L Sterling; Melissa B Harrell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 3.240