| Literature DB >> 32948678 |
Delphine L Chen1, Safia Ballout2, Laigao Chen3, Joseph Cheriyan4,5, Gourab Choudhury6, Ana M Denis-Bacelar7, Elise Emond8, Kjell Erlandsson8, Marie Fisk5, Francesco Fraioli8, Ashley M Groves8, Roger N Gunn9,10, Jun Hatazawa11, Beverley F Holman12, Brian F Hutton8, Hidehiro Iida13, Sarah Lee14, William MacNee6, Keiko Matsunaga11, Divya Mohan15, David Parr16, Alaleh Rashidnasab8, Gaia Rizzo9,10, Deepak Subramanian17, Ruth Tal-Singer15, Kris Thielemans8, Nicola Tregay5, Edwin J R van Beek6, Laurence Vass5, Marcos F Vidal Melo18, Jeremy W Wellen19, Ian Wilkinson4,5, Frederick J Wilson20, Tilo Winkler18.
Abstract
PET with 18F-FDG has been increasingly applied, predominantly in the research setting, to study drug effects and pulmonary biology and to monitor disease progression and treatment outcomes in lung diseases that interfere with gas exchange through alterations of the pulmonary parenchyma, airways, or vasculature. To date, however, there are no widely accepted standard acquisition protocols or imaging data analysis methods for pulmonary 18F-FDG PET/CT in these diseases, resulting in disparate approaches. Hence, comparison of data across the literature is challenging. To help harmonize the acquisition and analysis and promote reproducibility, we collated details of acquisition protocols and analysis methods from 7 PET centers. From this information and our discussions, we reached the consensus recommendations given here on patient preparation, choice of dynamic versus static imaging, image reconstruction, and image analysis reporting.Entities:
Keywords: FDG; PET/CT; lung disease; pulmonary imaging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32948678 PMCID: PMC9364897 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.244780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucl Med ISSN: 0161-5505 Impact factor: 11.082