Literature DB >> 32948674

p53 Is Not Required for High CIN to Induce Tumor Suppression.

Laura C Funk1, Jun Wan1, Sean D Ryan1, Charanjeet Kaur1, Ruth Sullivan2,3, Avtar Roopra2,4, Beth A Weaver5,2,6.   

Abstract

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of cancer. While low levels of CIN can be tumor promoting, high levels of CIN cause cell death and tumor suppression. The widely used chemotherapeutic, paclitaxel (Taxol), exerts its anticancer effects by increasing CIN above a maximally tolerated threshold. One significant outstanding question is whether the p53 tumor suppressor is required for the cell death and tumor suppression caused by high CIN. Both p53 loss and reduction of the mitotic kinesin, centromere-associated protein-E, cause low CIN. Combining both genetic insults in the same cell leads to high CIN. Here, we test whether high CIN causes cell death and tumor suppression even in the absence p53. Despite a surprising sex-specific difference in tumor spectrum and latency in p53 heterozygous animals, these studies demonstrate that p53 is not required for high CIN to induce tumor suppression. Pharmacologic induction of high CIN results in equivalent levels of cell death due to loss of essential chromosomes in p53+/+ and p53-/- cells, further demonstrating that high CIN elicits cell death independently of p53 function. IMPLICATIONS: These results provide support for the efficacy of anticancer therapies that induce high CIN, even in tumors that lack functional p53. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32948674      PMCID: PMC7810023          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   6.333


  97 in total

Review 1.  Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Don W Cleveland; Yinghui Mao; Kevin F Sullivan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Unstable kinetochore-microtubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENP-E.

Authors:  Frances R Putkey; Thorsten Cramer; Mary K Morphew; Alain D Silk; Randall S Johnson; J Richard McIntosh; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Integrated Analysis of TP53 Gene and Pathway Alterations in The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Authors:  Lawrence A Donehower; Thierry Soussi; Anil Korkut; Yuexin Liu; Andre Schultz; Maria Cardenas; Xubin Li; Ozgun Babur; Teng-Kuei Hsu; Olivier Lichtarge; John N Weinstein; Rehan Akbani; David A Wheeler
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Mad2 is a critical mediator of the chromosome instability observed upon Rb and p53 pathway inhibition.

Authors:  Juan-Manuel Schvartzman; Pascal H G Duijf; Rocio Sotillo; Courtney Coker; Robert Benezra
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours.

Authors:  L A Donehower; M Harvey; B L Slagle; M J McArthur; C A Montgomery; J S Butel; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Living in CIN: Mitotic Infidelity and Its Consequences for Tumor Promotion and Suppression.

Authors:  Laura C Funk; Lauren M Zasadil; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Correlation of p53 status with outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using paclitaxel and doxorubicin in stage IIIB breast cancer.

Authors:  A Anelli; R R Brentani; A P Gadelha; A Amorim De Albuquerque; F Soares
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Numerical chromosomal instability mediates susceptibility to radiation treatment.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Matthew D Wood; Christopher D Laucius; Dian Qu; Ashley M Laughney; Gloria E Reynolds; Raymond J Louie; Joanna Phillips; Denise A Chan; Bassem I Zaki; John P Murnane; Claudia Petritsch; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Chronic centrosome amplification without tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Benjamin Vitre; Andrew J Holland; Anita Kulukian; Ofer Shoshani; Maretoshi Hirai; Yin Wang; Marcus Maldonado; Thomas Cho; Jihane Boubaker; Deborah A Swing; Lino Tessarollo; Sylvia M Evans; Elaine Fuchs; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Over-expression of Plk4 induces centrosome amplification, loss of primary cilia and associated tissue hyperplasia in the mouse.

Authors:  Paula A Coelho; Leah Bury; Marta N Shahbazi; Kifayathullah Liakath-Ali; Peri H Tate; Sam Wormald; Christopher J Hindley; Meritxell Huch; Joy Archer; William C Skarnes; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz; David M Glover
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.411

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome Missegregation as a Modulator of Radiation Sensitivity.

Authors:  Pippa F Cosper; Sarah E Copeland; John B Tucker; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Quantifying chromosomal instability from intratumoral karyotype diversity using agent-based modeling and Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Andrew R Lynch; Nicholas L Arp; Amber S Zhou; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 8.713

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.