| Literature DB >> 32948034 |
Anantha-Iyengar Gopalan1, Jun-Cheol Lee2, Gopalan Saianand3, Kwang-Pill Lee1, Prashant Sonar4,5, Rajarathnam Dharmarajan3, Yao-Long Hou6, Ki-Yong Ann7, Venkatramanan Kannan8, Wha-Jung Kim1.
Abstract
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been extensively investigated in interdisciplinary research (such as catalysis, energy, environment, health, etc.) owing to its attractive physico-chemical properties, abundant nature, chemical/environmental stability, low-cost manufacturing, low toxicity, etc. Over time, TiO2-incorporated building/construction materials have been utilized for mitigating potential problems related to the environment and human health issues. However, there are challenges with regards to photocatalytic efficiency improvements, lab to industrial scaling up, and commercial product production. Several innovative approaches/strategies have been evolved towards TiO2 modification with the focus of improving its photocatalytic efficiency. Taking these aspects into consideration, research has focused on the utilization of many of these advanced TiO2 materials towards the development of construction materials such as concrete, mortar, pavements, paints, etc. This topical review focuses explicitly on capturing and highlighting research advancements in the last five years (mainly) (2014-2019) on the utilization of various modified TiO2 materials for the development of practical photocatalytic building materials (PBM). We briefly summarize the prospective applications of TiO2-based building materials (cement, mortar, concretes, paints, coating, etc.) with relevance to the removal of outdoor/indoor NOx and volatile organic compounds, self-cleaning of the surfaces, etc. As a concluding remark, we outline the challenges and make recommendations for the future outlook of further investigations and developments in this prosperous area.Entities:
Keywords: building materials; photocatalytic; pollutant removal; self-cleaning; titanium dioxide
Year: 2020 PMID: 32948034 PMCID: PMC7559443 DOI: 10.3390/nano10091854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Scheme 1General schematic showing the prospects of titanium dioxide (TiO2) in building-related applications.
Scheme 2(a) Several contributions published annually from 2010 to 2019 on TiO2-based photocatalytic materials in various sub-topics and (b) Number of published review articles annually from 2010 to 2019 for TiO2-based photocatalytic building materials.
Scheme 3Pictorial representation of the synthetic methodologies and modification strategies of the TiO2 photocatalyst.
Scheme 4The potential sources and health and environmental effects of NOx.
Scheme 5Common strategies (primary and secondary) employed for NOx removal. (FLOX: flameless oxidation; COSTAIR: continuous staged air combustion; GAFT: gas-dynamic abated flame temperature).
Figure 1Decomposition rate of Rhodamine B for (a) Trani stone and (b) Lecce stone as a function of irradiation time [107]. (T: tetrapropylorthotitanate, AL: alcohol, and AQ: aqueous (water). TAL refers to a combination of T and AL in preparation condition, and TAQ refers to the combination of T and water.
Figure 2Samples exposed on top of the ARPA (Regional Agency for Environmental Protection) [108].
Figure 3Experimental schemes of (a) dry and (b) wet condition test and (c) photocatalytic cement-based materials (wet conditions) [113].
Figure 4NO2 adsorption on hardened cement paste, as well as into the pore solution [115].
Figure 5Average degradation efficiencies of NO for all studied specimens [119]. Eight TiO2 products (VU0 to VU7) with varying grain size, anatase proportions, and surface area. VU0 is the reference commercial cement mixture.
Figure 6Scheme showing the reactions occurring at the surface of TiO2 (anatase phase) [126].
Figure 7Photocatalytic NOx removal on architectural mortar samples (PC-S7-coated and 5% TiO2-intermixed) under UV-A and sunlight irradiation conditions [128].
Figure 8Formation of NO2, NO, and HONO on photocatalytic paints with 0%, 3.5%, 5.25%, and 7% of TiO2 NPs (NO2 mixing ratio of 40 ppb and RH of 40%) [129].
Figure 9NO conversion for the four tested paints [131]. Paint #1 to Paint #4: Paints formulated with varying compositions of TiO2, CaCO3, P25, and PC500.
Possible sources of indoor pollutants of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
| VOCs | Potential Sources |
|---|---|
| Formaldehyde | Pesticides, flooring/insulating/wood materials, coatings, paints, etc. |
| Acetaldehyde | Flooring/wood materials, etc. |
| Naphthalene | Insulating/mixed materials, etc. |
| Chloroform | Glues, pesticides, etc. |
| Ethylbenzene | Adhesive, paints, furniture, etc. |
| Dichlorobenzene | Wood/ceiling materials, etc. |
| Carbon tetrachloride | Paints, coatings, industrial cleaning agents, etc. |
| Toluene | Pesticides, flooring/insulating/wood materials, adhesives, paintings, etc. |
| Others (ketones, esters) | Perfumes, paints, adhesives, plastics, resins, disinfectants, etc. |
Summary of TiO2 based photocatalytic composites for NOx removal.
| Modification Type | Specific Example | Methodology | Remarks on NOx Removal | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Vanadium/TiO2 | Functional theory calculations combined with in-situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform | Selective photooxidation-stable formation of V/TiO2 surface | [ |
| P25 (titania) functionalized with thioglycolic acid (TGA)-capped CdTe colloidal quantum dots (QDs) | Chemical methods | TGA, CdTe, and titania components in the TGA-CdTe/P25 composite | [ | |
| Hydroxyapatite (HAp)/beta-tricalcium phosphate/TiO2 | Intermixing and a post-curing coating procedure | Active sites are available on the surface of the material leading to greater NOx oxidation | [ | |
| Composites of TiO2 (Hombikat, P25, sol-gel synthesis) and zeolite ZSM-5 | Sol-gel and solid-state dispersion | Well-dispersed TiO2 particles over the ZSM-5 crystals caused good NOx removal | [ | |
| TiO2 covered with a thin layer of an alumina–silica | Commercial | Coating TiO2 with Al2O3 and SiO2 dramatically increases the conversion of NO2 to NO on TiO2 | [ | |
| TiO2 photocatalyst with Ba species | Impregnation | Ba–Ti mixed oxide phase was formed-the surface of amorphous Ba–Ti mixed oxides could store NO3− more densely than the TiO2 surface | [ | |
| TiO2–SiO2 mixed oxides | Blast furnace, Chemical method, and calcination | High activity in selective catalytic reduction, excellent stability, and low preparation catalyst cost | [ | |
| TiO2 and ZnO | Plasma treatment | Longer reaction times for efficient oxidation of NOx | [ | |
| Fe/TiO2 | Co-precipitation | Fe increased the electron-hole separation efficiency because Fe3+ incorporated into TiO2 can act as an electron-trapped agent | [ | |
| Au/CeO2−TiO2 | Chemical method | Au−Ce3+ interface formed and served as an anchoring site of the O2 molecule. Then more adsorbed oxygen could react with photogenerated electrons on TiO2 surfaces to produce more superoxide radicals for NO oxidation | [ | |
| TiO2/Al2O3binary oxide | Sol-gel synthesis protocols | Alumina domains can be utilized as active NOx capturing sites that can significantly eliminate the release of toxic NO | [ | |
| TiO2-Carbon | Chemical method | Reduction of NO towards N2 by proton adsorption-promotion on Pt-Pt sites or by selective-secondary sites (as titanium dioxide) | [ | |
| TiO2/G hybrids | Sol-gel | Interaction between TiO2 nanoparticles and graphene sheets, acting as electron traps. | [ | |
| G included pure rutile TiO2 nanowire | Electrospinning, sol-gel, and calcination | The inclusion of G into TiO2 nanostructures enhances the visible light photoactivity | [ | |
| TiO2/G | Solvothermal process | Favorable NO2 adsorption on graphene through an interaction between the NO2 molecules and the conjugated system in graphene sheets | [ | |
| TiO2/Printex U (a famous model carbon black) | Coating | Reduction of NO to nitrogen, achieving DeNOx without any reducing agent | [ | |
|
| Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 NPs | Spray-coating | Surface oxygen vacancies caused by the diffusion of photo-generated holes play significant roles-Ti4+ is reduced to Ti3+, dissociating water molecules and facilitating the adsorption of −OH species on surfaces-photoinduced hydrophilicity | [ |
| Modified with Ce, La, and Gd | Chemical method (gel precipitation) and hydrothermal treatment | The addition of rare earth elements to hydrothermal processing slowed the anatase-to-rutile and brookite-to-rutile transformation-grain boundary pinning effect | [ | |
| TiO2 plates doped with Ba, La | Calcination | Doped with 5%-Zr4+ and calcined at 800 °C, resulted in 100% degradation of NOx as compared to commercial P25. The addition of Zr4+ caused a decrease in crystalline sizes of both anatase and rutile forms causing an increase in surface area | [ | |
| Ni doping | Thermal treatment | 6% weight Nickel doped KA100 and annealed at 1000 °C showed excellent NOx removal. Transformation into 100% rutile phase and size effects played roles in photoactivities. | [ | |
| Cu, Zn, and Cu-Zn | Thermal treatment | 0.25 Cu/0.75 Zn-Ti450 (Cu:Zn molar ratio equal to 1:3) was the best performing specimen in degrading NOx | [ | |
| Carbon-doped titanium dioxide and nano-silica | Coating and UV-pre treatment | Highest NO degradation is achieved by the two-layered coatings | [ | |
| Nitrogen modified TiO2 | Sol-gel green synthetic method | Heated at 450 °C possessed excellent photocatalytic activity under visible white-light (indoor artificial lighting)-double PCA than P25 TiO2 NPs. | [ | |
| Barium-modified titanium dioxide | Impregnation method | BaO species, which was generated from the decomposition of Ba(NO3) 2, works as a NOx storage material | [ | |
|
| The electronic crystallographic structural relationship for Ti0.909W0.091O2Nx | Mixing and calcination | Oxygen vacancy acts as an electron trapping center for conduction-band electrons and reduction of NO | [ |
| TiO2 to detect secondary aerosol pollutant formation | Seed via atomization | Reactive carbonyl compounds caused by the photo-degradation role of TiO2 lead to the suppression of C formation | [ | |
| Titanium dioxide nanosheets and anatase titanium dioxide nanospindles with highly exposed (001) facets | Hydrothermal and faceted engineering | Preferential exposure of (001) facets of TiO2 had a positive effect on increasing the specific surface area of the catalysts | [ | |
| Size controlled nanoparticles | Controlled annealing | Mortar mixtures with only 1 wt.% TiO2 resulted in NOx degradation rates close to 80% | [ | |
| Crystalline mixed-phase (Anatase/Rutile) mesoporous | Calcination at temperatures (600–800 °C, 1 °C/min) followed by a second heat treatment | A synergetic effect between anatase and rutile | [ |
Figure 10Arrangement of UV lamps and TiO2-PET sheets (surface area of the TiO2-PET sheet) [174].
Figure 11Surface emission fluxes (molecule cm−2 s−1) obtained for selected VOCs (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acids, carbonyls, aromatics, and benzene) under “dark” conditions (lozenge) and in the presence of a UV light (solid) [175].
Figure 12Removal efficiency of toluene and isobutanol and PCO reaction rate for different systems (UVC-PCO, VUV photolysis, and VUV-PCO) (V = 1.25 m/s) [177]. PCO: photocatalytic oxidation; UVC: ultravacuum, VUV: vacuum ultraviolet.
Figure 13Scheme depicting the adsorption and photo-degradation synergetic model of TiO2 nanofibers/Activated carbon fiber (TiNF/ACF) porous composites towards toluene removal [178].
Summary of various TiO2 based pristine/modified building materials having self-cleaning properties, their preparation route, and salient results.
| Type of Building Material | Pristine/ | Preparation Method | Testing Mode | Salient Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement paste | Pristine TiO2 | Mixing with cement paste (0.5~7.5% by weight of cement) | Photo-degradation of methylene blue (MB) under UV light | Photo-degradation ratio by 9.5% (0.5% for the plain) | [ |
| Cement paste | Modified TiO2 | Sol-gel dip-coating on cement paste surface | Photo-degradation of methyl orange (MO) under UV light | MO degradation efficiency by 90% in 2 h | [ |
| Cement paste | Modified TiO2 | Mixing with cement paste (1%, 5% and 10% by weight of cement) | RR198 dye degradation under UV light | RR198 dye degradation rate by 60% | [ |
| Cement paste | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with cement paste (5% and 30% by weight of cement) | Congo Red (CR) dye degradation under a UV lamp and visible lamp | Absorbance decreases by 94% in 5 h using P25 | [ |
| Cement paste | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with cement paste | Photo-degradation of MB under UV light | Photo-degradation ratio by 100% in 3 h | [ |
| Cement paste | Pristine TiO2 | Coating on a cement paste substrate | Photo-degradation of MB under UV light | Performance similar to the reference material P25 in 2.5 h | [ |
| Cement paste | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with cement paste (2% by weight of cement) | Photo-degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) under UV irradiation | Photo-degradation rate by 90% in 60 min | [ |
| Cement paste | Modified TiO2 | Mixed with clinker | Photo-degradation of MB under UV light at the age of 6 months | Photo-degradation rate by 25% in 4 h | [ |
| Cement paste | Modified TiO2 | Spraying TiO2 sols on cement paste | Photo-degradation of RhB under UV irradiation | Photo-degradation rate by 65% in 9 h | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with cement (0.5~10% by weight of cement) | Reflectance recovery subject to artificial UV or direct sunlight irradiation | Reflectance recovery by 85% in 8 h under UV irradiation | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with cement (2% by weight of cement) | Discoloration of organic dyes (RhB and MB) under UV irradiation | Color change by 40~60% in 24 h under UV irradiation | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with Mortar | Monitoring the variations in color under sunlight | After aging, photoactive samples showed limited color variation | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with Mortar (2.5~10%) | Photo-degradation of Rh Bunder daylight lamp | RhB dye degradation rate by 85% in 24 h | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Coating TiO2 dispersed in ethanol on the mortar surface. | Photo-degradation of soot concentration under UV light | Photo-degradation ratio by 70% | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | TiO2 intermixing and coating | Photo-degradation of Rh Bunder visible light | RhB removal over 50% | [ |
| Mortar | Modified TiO2 | Spraying TiO2 suspension on mortar | Photo-degradation of RhB under UV irradiation | RhB removal by 80% in 3.5 h | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with mortar (1~5% by weight of a mixture) | Photo-degradation of diesel exhaust soot under UV light and sunlight | Slightly higher degradation of organic matter on the surface for the mortar with higher TiO2 content | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Coated on mortar substrate and mixed with mortar | Photo-degradation of RhB under UV irradiation | RhB removal by 65% after weathering | [ |
| Mortar | Modified TiO2 | Mixed with mortar (3% by weight of mortar) | Photo-degradation of RhB under mercury lamp | RhB removal by 100% within 1 h | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with mortar (2.5% and 5% by weight of mortar) | Photo-degradation of soot concentration under UV light | Promotion of self-cleaning effect for TiO2-containing mortars after UVA irradiation. | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Use of ready-mixed mortar containing TiO2 | Photo-degradation of RhB under UV irradiation | RhB discoloration rate by 55% in 26 h | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Spraying TiO2 sols on mortar surface | Photo-degradation of Rh Bunder fluorescent lamp | RhB photo-degradation rate by 100% in 5 days | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Coating on mortar surface | Photo-degradation of RhB under UV irradiation | RhB removal by 65% in 26 h | [ |
| Mortar | Modified TiO2 | Mixed with mortar (3% by weight of cement) | Photo-degradation of MB under UV light | Photo-degradation rate by 35% in 4 h | [ |
| Mortar | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with mortar (2% by weight of cement) | Nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) ink color change under UV light | NBT testing takes substantially less time (10 min) than conventional photocatalytic activity tests | [ |
| Mortar | Modified TiO2 | Dip-coating of TiO2/SiO2 sol on mortar surface | Photo-degradation of RhB under UV irradiation | Photo-degradation rate by 90% in 5 h | [ |
| Concrete | Modified TiO2 | Spraying TiO2 suspension on a porous concrete | Photo-degradation of MO under UV light | Photo-degradation ratio by 35% in 3 h | [ |
| Concrete | Pristine TiO2 | Slurry method | Phenol removal efficiency under UV light | Phenol removal ratio by 85% in 4 h (ESM) | [ |
| Concrete | Pristine TiO2 and Modified TiO2 | Spray and dip coating | Photo-degradation of MB under UV light | MB degradation by 5.2 × 10−4 pixels−1 | [ |
| Concrete | Pristine TiO2 | Spraying TiO2 suspension on concrete | Photo-degradation of MO under UV light | MO degradation efficiency by 100% in 2 h | [ |
| Concrete | Modified TiO2 | Coating on a concrete substrate | Photo-degradation of MB under UV light | Photo-degradation ratio by 100% in 5 h | [ |
| Concrete | Pristine TiO2 | Mixed with concrete (3.5% by weight of cement) | Photo-degradation of MB under UV light | Photo-degradation ratio by 82% in 26 h | [ |
| Concrete | Modified TiO2 | Spraying TiO2 sols on the concrete surface | Photo-degradation of Rh Bunder natural condition | RhB photo-degradation rate by 30% in 24 h (for the specimen at the age of 2000 h) | [ |