| Literature DB >> 32947819 |
Lucia Pérez-Manrique1, Karina León-Pérez1, Emmanuel Zamora-Sánchez2, Sarah Davies3, Christopher Ober4, Bethany Wilson5, Paul McGreevy5.
Abstract
Restrictive nosebands are used in equestrian sports to hold the bit in place and reduce mouth-opening, a response that can attract penalties in some sports and is thought to reduce the rider's control of the horse. Sustained pressure from such tightly fitted (restrictive) nosebands denies normal behaviour and thus, causes frustration and distress that can jeopardise horse welfare. It also may push the cheek against the molar teeth, compress soft tissues including blood vessels and nerves, and possibly induce chronic changes to underlying bone. This study of mature cavalry horses (n = 144) was designed to explore relationships between visual and palpable damage to structures that underlie the nosebands of horses and any related bony changes in those horses as evidenced by radiography. Working independently of each other, two researchers inspected the horses for visual changes and palpable changes before the horses were radiographed. The radiographs were assessed by a separate pair of veterinary radiologists, again working independently of each other. Among the current population of horses, 37.5% had one or more radiographic changes to the nasal bones according to both radiologists, and 13.8% had one or more radiographic changes to the mandible. For nasal bones, the two radiologists reported bone deposition in 6.9% and 8.3% of the horses and bone thinning in 33.3% and 56.9% of the horses, respectively. By palpation, they found that 82% and 84% of the horses had palpable bone deposition of the nasal bones and 32% and 33.4% had palpable bone thinning. For the mandibles, the radiologists reported increased bone deposition in 18.8% and 32.6% of the horses but no bone thinning. By palpation, the two examiners reported 30.6% and 32.7% of the horses had palpable bone deposition and 10.4% and 11.1% had palpable bone thinning. This is the first report of lesions to the mandible at this site and this article presents the first confirmation of bony lesions at the site typically subjected to pressure from restrictive nosebands. These results suggest that radiographic bone thinning is more apparent in the nasal bones of riding horses than in the mandible and that both palpable and radiographic bone deposition are more likely in the mandible than in the nasal bones. That said, we note that the current study provides no evidence of a causal link between any piece of gear or its putative tightness and the lesions in these anatomical locations. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors for these clusters of lesions. The inadvertent deformation of bones in the horse's head for competitive advantage is difficult to justify on ethical grounds.Entities:
Keywords: equitation science; lesion; nosebands; radiology; welfare
Year: 2020 PMID: 32947819 PMCID: PMC7552251 DOI: 10.3390/ani10091661
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Distribution of categories of lesions in nasal bones (n and %) as detected by two examiners conducting visual inspection and palpation.
| Visual Inspection | Palpation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Examiner 1 | Examiner 2 | Examiner 1 | Examiner 2 | |||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| Normal | 15 | 10.4 | 20 | 13.9 | 4 | 2.8 | 6 | 4.2 |
| Exostosis | ||||||||
| Suspicious exostosis | 37 | 25.7 | 33 | 22.9 | 13 | 9.0 | 11 | 7.6 |
| Confirmed exostosis | 37 | 25.7 | 33 | 22.9 | 69 | 47.9 | 65 | 45.1 |
| Concavity | ||||||||
| Suspicious concavity | 3 | 2.1 | 3 | 2.1 | 2 | 1.4 | 5 | 3.5 |
| Confirmed concavity | 3 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2.8 | 3 | 2.1 |
| Complex lesion | ||||||||
| Suspicious exostosis and concavity | 12 | 8.3 | 12 | 8.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Suspicious concavity and confirmed exostosis | 18 | 12.5 | 18 | 12.5 | 10 | 6.9 | 9 | 6.3 |
| Suspicious exostosis and confirmed concavity | 1 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 |
| Confirmed exostosis and concavity | 18 | 12.5 | 24 | 16.7 | 42 | 29.2 | 44 | 30.6 |
| Total | 144 | 144 | 144 | 144 | ||||
Figure 1Photograph of profile of horse in which examiners (n = 2) agreed there was confirmed: (a) exostosis and (b) concavity in the nasal bones. Photographs courtesy of Missael García-Márquez.
Figure 2The distribution of visual and palpation findings in a random selection of 144 cavalry horses.
Figure 3The distribution of radiological findings in the nasal bones of a random selection of 144 cavalry horses.
Figure 4Radiographs showing the nasal bones of a horse in which radiologists (n = 2) agreed there was bone deposition that was: (a) typical of affected horses and (b) moderate.
Figure 5Radiographs showing the nasal bones of a horse in which radiologists (n = 2) agreed there was bone thinning that was: (a) typical of affected horses and (b) moderate.
The average of the two radiologists’ scores as percentage of the number of horses affected. Types of radiographic lesion noted in those horses with consensus abnormal, disputed abnormal, and consensus normal radiographic films with respect to the nasal bone lesions included in this study.
| Nasal Bone Radiographs | Consensus Abnormal | Disputed Abnormal | No Abnormality Detected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bone deposition | 19.4% | 1.28% | - |
| Bone thinning | 89.8% | 42.31% | - |
| Loss of bone homogeneity | 32.4% | 14.10% | - |
| Soft tissue hypertrophy | 8.3% | 2.56% | - |
Relationship between any radiographic lesion being noted and the exostosis physical examination findings of the nasal bones of 144 horses.
| Radiologic Examination Outcome (Any Bone Deposition, Bone Thinning, Loss of Bone Homogeneity, or Surrounding Soft Tissue Inflammation/Hypertrophy of the Nasal Bone) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus Disease | Disputed by Scorers | No Abnormality Detected | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| No suspicion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 13.7 |
| Suspicion from 1 of 2 scorers | 1 | 1.9 | 1 | 2.6 | 3 | 5.9 |
| Suspicion by both scorers | 2 | 3.7 | 2 | 5.1 | 4 | 7.8 |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, no finding by 1 scorer | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7.7 | 2 | 3.9 |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, suspected by 1 scorer | 2 | 3.7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3.9 |
| Confirmed by 2 scorers | 49 | 90.7 | 33 | 84.6 | 33 | 64.7 |
|
| ||||||
| No suspicion | 2 | 3.7 | 1 | 2.6 | 12 | 23.5 |
| Suspicion from 1 of 2 scorers | 3 | 5.6 | 3 | 7.7 | 5 | 9.8 |
| Suspicion by both scorers | 10 | 18.5 | 10 | 25.6 | 16 | 31.4 |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, no finding by 1 scorer | 1 | 1.9 | 1 | 2.6 | 1 | 2.0 |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, suspected by 1 scorer | 5 | 9.3 | 5 | 12.8 | 3 | 5.9 |
| Confirmed by 2 scorers | 33 | 61.1 | 19 | 48.7 | 14 | 27.5 |
Relationship between any radiographic lesion being noted and the concavity physical examination findings of the nasal bones of 144 horses.
| Radiologic Examination Outcome (Any Bone Deposition, Bone Thinning, Loss of Bone Homogeneity, or Surrounding Soft Tissue Swelling of the Nasal Bone) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus Disease | Disputed by Scorers | No Abnormality Detected | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| No suspicion | 24 | 44.4 | 24 | 61.5 | 25 | 49.0 |
| Suspicion from 1 of 2 scorers | 4 | 7.4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7.8 |
| Suspicion by both scorers | 1 | 1.9 | 2 | 5.1 | 3 | 5.9 |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, no finding by 1 scorer | 7 | 13.0 | 2 | 5.1 | 5 | 9.8 |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, suspected by 1 scorer | 1 | 1.9 | 2 | 5.1 | 3 | 5.9 |
| Confirmed by 2 scorers | 17 | 31.5 | 9 | 23.1 | 11 | 21.6 |
|
| ||||||
| No suspicion | 24 | 44.4 | 22 | 56.4 | 31 | 60.8 |
| Suspicion from 1 of 2 scorers | 6 | 11.1 | 3 | 7.7 | 7 | 13.7 |
| Suspicion by both scorers | 10 | 18.5 | 6 | 15.4 | 6 | 11.8 |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, no finding by 1 scorer | 4 | 7.4 | 1 | 2.6 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, suspected by 1 scorer | 1 | 1.9 | 3 | 7.7 | 2 | 3.9 |
| Confirmed by 2 scorers | 9 | 16.7 | 4 | 10.3 | 5 | 9.8 |
Figure 6Photograph of profile of horse in which examiners (n = 2) agreed there was confirmed exostosis on the mandible. Photograph courtesy of Missael García-Márquez.
Distribution of categories of lesions in mandible bones as detected by two examiners conducting visual inspection and palpation.
| Visual Inspection | Palpation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Examiner 1 | Examiner 2 | Examiner 1 | Examiner 2 | |||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| Normal | 86 | 59.7 | 91 | 63.2 | 57 | 39.6 | 54 | 37.5% |
| Exostosis | ||||||||
| Suspicious exostosis | 28 | 19.4 | 22 | 15.3 | 15 | 10.4 | 20 | 13.9 |
| Confirmed exostosis | 17 | 11.8 | 12 | 8.3 | 43 | 29.9 | 39 | 27.1 |
| Concavity | ||||||||
| Suspicious concavity | 11 | 7.6 | 10 | 6.9 | 12 | 8.3 | 14 | 9.7 |
| Confirmed concavity | 1 | 0.7 | 4 | 2.8 | 12 | 8.3 | 12 | 8.3 |
| Complex lesion | ||||||||
| Suspicious exostosis and concavity | 1 | 0.7 | 3 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Suspicious concavity and confirmed exostosis | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.4 | 1 | 0.7 | 2 | 1.4 |
| Suspicious exostosis and confirmed concavity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Confirmed exostosis and concavity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2.1 | 3 | 2.1 | |
| 57 | 39.6 | 54 | 37.5 | |||||
| Total | 144 | 144 | ||||||
Figure 7The distribution of radiological findings in the mandibles of a random selection of 144 cavalry horses.
Figure 8Radiograph showing the mandible of a horse in which radiologists (n = 2) agreed there was bone deposition that was: (a) typical of affected horses and (b) moderate.
Figure 9Radiograph showing the mandible of a horse in which radiologists (n = 2) agreed there was loss of mandibular homogeneity.
Figure 10Radiograph showing the nasal bones of a horse in which radiologists (n = 2) agreed there was both bone thinning and bone deposition.
The average of the two radiologists’ scores as percentage of the number of horses affected. Types of radiographic lesion noted in those horses with consensus abnormal, disputed abnormal, and consensus normal radiographic films with respect to the mandibular lesions included in this study.
| Mandible | Consensus Abnormal | Disputed Abnormal | No Abnormality Detected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bone deposition | 87.5% | 45.0% | - |
| Bone thinning | 3.1% | 0.0% | - |
| Loss of bone homogeneity | 14.1% | 0.0% | - |
| Soft tissue hypertrophy | 68.8% | 47.5% | - |
Relationship between any radiographic lesion being noted and the exostosis physical examination findings of the mandibles of 144 horses.
| Radiologic Examination Outcome (Any Bone Deposition, Bone Thinning, Loss of Bone Homogeneity, or Surrounding Soft Tissue Swelling of the Nasal Bone) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus Disease | Disputed by Scorers | No Abnormality Detected | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| No suspicion | 9 | 28.1% | 7 | 35.0% | 58 | 63.0% |
| Suspicion from 1 of 2 scorers | 1 | 3.1% | 3 | 15.0% | 4 | 4.3% |
| Suspicion by both scorers | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 8.7% |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, no finding by 1 scorer | 1 | 3.1% | 1 | 5.0% | 3 | 3.3% |
| Conformed by 1 scorer, suspected by 1 scorer | 1 | 3.1% | 3 | 15.0% | 8 | 8.7% |
| Confirmed by 2 scorers | 20 | 62.5% | 6 | 30.0% | 11 | 12.0% |
|
| ||||||
| No suspicion | 8 | 25.0% | 12 | 60.0% | 73 | 79.3% |
| Suspicion from 1 of 2 scorers | 6 | 18.8% | 2 | 10.0% | 4 | 4.3% |
| Suspicion by both scorers | 7 | 21.9% | 4 | 20.0% | 9 | 9.8% |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, no finding by 1 scorer | 2 | 6.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 3.3% |
| Conformed by 1 scorer, suspected by 1 scorer | 1 | 3.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.1% |
| Confirmed by 2 scorers | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 10.0% | 2 | 2.2% |
Relationship between any radiographic lesion being noted and the concavity physical exam findings of the mandible of 144 horses.
| Radiologic Examination Outcome (Any Bone Deposition, Bone Thinning, Loss of Bone Homogeneity, or Surrounding Soft Tissue Swelling of the Nasal Bone) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus Disease | Disputed by Scorers | No Abnormality Detected | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| No suspicion | 23 | 71.9% | 13 | 65.0% | 66 | 71.7% |
| Suspicion from 1 of 2 scorers | 3 | 9.4% | 3 | 15.0% | 8 | 8.7% |
| Suspicion by both scorers | 1 | 3.1% | 1 | 5.0% | 5 | 5.4% |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, no finding by 1 scorer | 1 | 3.1% | 1 | 5.0% | 8 | 8.7% |
| Conformed by 1 scorer, suspected by 1 scorer | 1 | 3.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Confirmed by 2 scorers | 3 | 9.4% | 2 | 10.0% | 5 | 5.4% |
|
| ||||||
| No suspicion | 26 | 81.3% | 15 | 75.0% | 79 | 85.9% |
| Suspicion from 1 of 2 scorers | 4 | 12.5% | 3 | 15.0% | 7 | 7.6% |
| Suspicion by both scorers | 2 | 6.3% | 2 | 10.0% | 2 | 2.2% |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, no finding by 1 scorer | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 2.2% |
| Confirmed by 1 scorer, suspected by 1 scorer | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.1% |
| Confirmed by 2 scorers | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.1% |