| Literature DB >> 32947796 |
Xiulong Zhang1, Hao Li1, Xiaoxing Hu1, Pengyao Zheng1, Mitsuru Hirota2, Takashi Kamijo2.
Abstract
How photosynthetic-related leaf traits of non-nitrogen (N)-fixing pioneer species respond to extreme habitat conditions of primary succession is still not well-elucidated, especially in volcanically N-deplete habitats. The effect of N-deplete soil on photosynthetic-related leaf traits can provide a basis for predicting how plants adjust their strategies to adapt to such habitats. To examine the responses of leaf traits to extreme conditions, we investigated Miscanthus condensatus (a non-N-fixing C4 pioneer grass) which grows on a volcanically devastated area on Miyake-jima Island, Japan, in which the volcanic ash has been deposited for 17-18 years since the 2000-year eruption. Leaf N content (Narea), light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax), and photosynthetic N use efficiency (PNUE) in three contrasting study sites: bare land (BL), shrub land gap (SLG), and shrub land under canopy (SLUC) were determined. Results indicated that compared to previous studies and internal comparison of Miyake Island, M. condensatus in BL was able to maintain a relatively high Amax, Narea and PNUE. The higher Amax was in part a result of the higher PNUE. This is a characteristic necessary for its successful growth in N-deplete soils. These results suggest that M. condensatus has photosynthetic-related advantages for adaptation to volcanically N-deplete habitats.Entities:
Keywords: Miscanthus condensatus; leaf traits; low N; photosynthetic N use efficiency; volcanically devastated sites
Year: 2020 PMID: 32947796 PMCID: PMC7570380 DOI: 10.3390/plants9091212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Location and morphometric characteristics of bare land (BL), shrub land gap (SLG) and shrub land under canopy (SLUC). Different letters indicate significant differences between the study sites revealed by Steel Dwass post hoc test at a significance level p < 0.05 after Kruskal–Wallis test. Abbreviations are meters above sea level (m a.s.l); photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD); soil total N (STN) (n = 30); soil total carbon (STC) (n = 30); Canopy openness (n = 48).
| Factor | BL | GL | SL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Location | 34°04.689′ N, 139°30.816′ E | 34°04.790′ N, 139°30.245′ E | 34°04.790′ N, 139°30.245′ E |
| Altitude (m a.s.l) | 500 | 400 | 400 |
| Ash depth (cm) | 30–35 | 30–35 | 30–35 |
| Air temperature (°C) | 25.54 | 26.16 | 25.64 |
| Maximum PPFD (µmol·m−2·s−1) | 1227 | 531 | 102 |
| Canopy openness (%) | 74 ± 0.5 a | 68 ± 1.3 a | 24 ± 1.4 b |
| STN (%) | 0.02 ± 0.002 b | 0.24 ± 0.02 a | 0.30 ± 0.01 a |
| STC (%) | 0.20 ± 0.03 b | 4.54 ± 0.68 a | 5.78 ± 0.42 a |
The F values of two way-ANOVA for effects of site, month and their interactions on each leaf traits (n = 144) of M. condensatus. Abbreviations are maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm); transpiration rate (E); leaf N content (Narea); light compensation point (LCP); leaf mass per area (LMA); light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax); water use efficiency (WUE); photosynthetic N use efficiency (PNUE). Significance of the coefficients: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
| Leaf Traits | Site | Month | Site |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fv/Fm | 133.359 *** | 18.826 *** | 5.682 *** |
| E (mmol−1·H2O m−2·s−1) | 44.21 *** | 31.2 *** | 14.32 *** |
| Narea (g·m−2) | 40.372 *** | 2.31 * | 2.796 ** |
| LCP (µmol·m−2·s−1) | 39.24 *** | 8.59 *** | 2.95 ** |
| LMA (g·m−2) | 140.834 *** | 8.301 *** | 2.901 ** |
| Amax (µmol·m−2·s−1) | 32.03 *** | 1.666 | 2.837 ** |
| WUE (μmol·mmol−1) | 2.76 | 3.82 ** | 2.779 ** |
| PNUE (μmol·CO2 mol·N−1·s−1) | 1.624 | 0.927 | 3.067 ** |
Leaf traits of M. condensatus (Mean value ± SE; n = 48) in bare land (BL), shrub land gap (SLG) and shrub land under canopy (SLUC). Abbreviations are maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm); transpiration rate (E); leaf N content (Narea); light compensation point (LCP); leaf mass per area (LMA); light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax); water use efficiency (WUE); photosynthetic N use efficiency (PNUE). For E, Narea, LMA, Amax, and PNUE, different letters indicate significant differences between the study sites revealed by Tukey’s post hoc test at a significance level p < 0.05 after one-way ANOVA. For Fv/Fm, LCP and WUE, different letters indicate significant differences between the study sites revealed by Steel Dwass post hoc test at a significance level p < 0.05 after Kruskal–Wallis test.
| Leaf Traits | BL | SLG | SLUC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fv/Fm | 0.69 ± 0.05 c | 0.75 ± 0.03 b | 0.77 ± 0.05 a |
| E (mmol−1·H2O·m−2·s−1) | 1.51 ± 0.05 b | 2.22 ± 0.06 a | 2.05 ± 0.07 a |
| Narea (g·m−2) | 1.07 ± 0.25 c | 1.47 ± 0.22 a | 1.24 ± 0.22 b |
| LCP (µmol·m−2·s−1) | 27.08 ± 3.53 a | 32.54 ± 1.89 a | 16.74 ± 1.02 b |
| LMA (g·m−2) | 89.29 ± 11.11 a | 79.04 ± 8.61 b | 60.03 ± 10.98 c |
| Amax (µmol·m−2·s−1) | 18.81 ± 3.72 c | 25.44 ± 4.91 a | 23.56 ± 4.65 b |
| WUE (μmol·mmol−1) | 12.29 ± 1.17 a | 9.39 ± 0.21 b | 9.73 ± 0.20 b |
| PNUE (μmol·CO2 mol·N−1·s−1) | 258.79 ± 82.75 a | 247.49 ± 65.66 a | 272.56 ± 69.82 a |
Figure 1Monthly changes of leaf N content (Narea) (a); transpiration rate (E) (b); maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) (c); light-saturated photosynthetic rate(Amax) (d); water use efficiency (WUE) (e); light compensation point (LCP) (f); leaf mass per area (LMA) (g); photosynthetic N use efficiency (PNUE) (h) in bare land (BL) (circle), in shrub land gap (SLG) (square) and in shrub land under canopy (SLUC) (triangle). Vertical bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 8).
Figure 2Monthly changes of estimate actual photosynthetic rates (Aactural) under actual ambient maximum photosynthetic photon flux density (max PPFD: µmol·m−2·s−1) of M. condensatus grown in BL (circle), in SLG (square) and in SLUC (triangle). Vertical bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 8).
Effect of environment factors on each leaf traits (n = 144) of M. condensatus (generalized linear mixed model—GLMM). Response variables are maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm); transpiration rate (E); leaf N content (Narea); light compensation point (LCP); leaf mass per area (LMA); light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax); water use efficiency (WUE); photosynthetic N use efficiency (PNUE), respectively. MR² Significance of the coefficients: ns p > 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
| Traits | Estimate | Std. Error |
| MR² | CR² | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fv/Fm | Canopy openness | −0.0009 | 0.0004 | * | 0.22 | 0.63 |
| STN | 0.0091 | 0.0398 | ns | |||
| Precipitation | −0.00003 | 0.0001 | ns | |||
| Temperature | 0.0015 | 0.0013 | ns | |||
| E (mmol−1·H2O·m−2·s−1) | Canopy openness | −0.0106 | 0.0057 | ns | 0.18 | 0.70 |
| STN | −0.3054 | 0.6187 | ns | |||
| Precipitation | 0.0074 | 0.0013 | *** | |||
| Temperature | 0.0123 | 0.0218 | ns | |||
| Narea (g·m−2) | Canopy openness | 0.0028 | 0.0019 | ns | 0.35 | 0.63 |
| STN | 1.5840 | 0.2406 | *** | |||
| Precipitation | −0.0004 | 0.0004 | ns | |||
| Temperature | −0.0103 | 0.0081 | ns | |||
| LCP (µmol·m−2·s−1) | Canopy openness | 0.8896 | 0.1060 | *** | 0.50 | 0.95 |
| STN | −3.4123 | 10.0378 | ns | |||
| Precipitation | −0.0098 | 0.0183 | ns | |||
| Temperature | 0.5708 | 0.2922 | ns | |||
| LMA (g·m−2) | Canopy openness | 0.6461 | 0.0793 | *** | 0.75 | 0.85 |
| STN | −15.6300 | 10.1579 | ns | |||
| Precipitation | −0.0223 | 0.0192 | ns | |||
| Temperature | 0.6693 | 0.3565 | ns | |||
| Amax (µmol·m−2·s−1) | Canopy openness | 0.0181 | 0.0376 | ns | 0.539 | 0.802 |
| STN | 40.6600 | 4.7130 | *** | |||
| Precipitation | 0.0247 | 0.0087 | ** | |||
| Temperature | 0.2123 | 0.1616 | ns | |||
| WUE (μmol·mmol−1) | Canopy openness | 0.0064 | 0.0098 | ns | 0.04 | 0.42 |
| STN | 0.2923 | 1.7096 | ns | |||
| Precipitation | −0.0080 | 0.0050 | ns | |||
| Temperature | 0.1058 | 0.0810 | ns | |||
| PNUE (μmol·CO2 mol·N−1·s−1) | Canopy openness | −1.9851 | 0.4008 | ** | 0.34 | 0.45 |
| STN | −404.9090 | 60.8571 | *** | |||
| Precipitation | 0.4855 | 0.1341 | *** | |||
| Temperature | 3.0690 | 2.3935 | ns |
Figure A1Daily rainfall (bars) and daily average air temperature (T air) (solid line) from June 2017 to July 2018. Pentagonal star represents the survey implementation day.
Figure A2Landscape of bare land (a) and shrub land gap (b), shrub land under canopy (c).
Figure A3The specific measurement date in bare land (BL), shrub land gap (SLG) and shrub land under canopy (SLUC).