Literature DB >> 32947179

Seizure outcome during bilateral, continuous, thalamic centromedian nuclei deep brain stimulation in patients with generalized epilepsy: a prospective, open-label study.

Arthur Cukiert1, Cristine Mella Cukiert2, Jose Augusto Burattini2, Pedro Paulo Mariani2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We report on the seizure frequency and attention outcome during thalamic centromedian stimulation (CM-DBS) in patients with refractory generalized epilepsy (GE).
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with GE who were submitted to CM-DBS and had at least one year of follow-up were prospectively studied. The CM was targeted bilaterally. Stimulation intensity was ramped up (bipolar, continuous, 130 Hz; 300μsec) until 4.5 V or until side effects developed. Contacts` position was determined on postoperative volumetric MRI scans. Attention was qualitatively evaluated using the SNAP-IV (Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham) questionnaire. Patients were considered responders during CM-DBS if an at least 50% seizure frequency reduction was obtained compared to baseline.
RESULTS: Median age was 15.5 years (13 males). Median follow-up time was 2.55 years. EEG disclosed generalized spike-and wave discharges in all patients. MRI was normal in 10 patients, showed diffuse atrophy in 6 patients, and showed abnormalities in 4 patients (3 patients had bilateral cortical development abnormalities and one had unilateral hemispheric atrophy). Patients presented with daily multiple seizure types (8 to 66 per day; median: 37), including tonic, atonic, myoclonic, atypical absence and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Mean DBS intensity was 4.3 V. An insertional effect was noted in 14 patients. CM-DBS was able to significantly reduce the frequency of tonic (p < 0.001), atypical absence seizures (p < 0.001), atonic seizures (p = 0.001) and bilateral generalized tonic-clonic seizures (p = 0.004). One patient became seizure-free. Ninety percent of the patients were considered responders (>50% seizure frequency reduction). All patients showed some improvement in attention. The mean number of items in which improvement was noted in the SNAP-IV questionnaire was 4.8. There was a significant relationship between overall seizure frequency reduction and improvement of attention (p = 0.033). DISCUSSION: This prospective, open label study included a large, homogeneous cohort and provided evidence on the efficacy of CM-DBS in reducing the seizure burden and increasing attention in patients with refractory generalized epilepsy.
Copyright © 2020 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DBS; generalized epilepsy; outcome; thalamic centromedian nucleus

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32947179     DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Seizure        ISSN: 1059-1311            Impact factor:   3.184


  8 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Treatment of Drug-Resistant Generalized Epilepsy.

Authors:  Katie L Bullinger; Abdulrahman Alwaki; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.030

Review 2.  Brain stimulation treatments in epilepsy: Basic mechanisms and clinical advances.

Authors:  Thomas J Foutz; Michael Wong
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Centromedian Nucleus of the Thalamus Deep Brain Stimulation for Genetic Generalized Epilepsy: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Shruti Agashe; David Burkholder; Keith Starnes; Jamie J Van Gompel; Brian N Lundstrom; Gregory A Worrell; Nicholas M Gregg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Case Report: Responsive Neurostimulation of the Centromedian Thalamic Nucleus for the Detection and Treatment of Seizures in Pediatric Primary Generalized Epilepsy.

Authors:  William P Welch; Jasmine L Hect; Taylor J Abel
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Deep brain stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nucleus for the treatment of FIRES.

Authors:  Jasmine L Hect; Luis D Fernandez; William P Welch; Taylor J Abel
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 6.  Emerging Trends in Neuromodulation for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

Authors:  Mohamed Abouelleil; Nachiket Deshpande; Rushna Ali
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 7.  Centromedian thalamic neuromodulation for the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

Authors:  Andrew J Zillgitt; M Ayman Haykal; Ahmad Chehab; Michael D Staudt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  The Optimal Target and Connectivity for Deep Brain Stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome.

Authors:  Aaron E L Warren; Linda J Dalic; Kristian J Bulluss; Annie Roten BAppSci; Wesley Thevathasan; John S Archer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 11.274

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.