Literature DB >> 32946766

Free Energy Landscape and Conformational Kinetics of Hoogsteen Base Pairing in DNA vs. RNA.

Dhiman Ray1, Ioan Andricioaei2.   

Abstract

Genetic information is encoded in the DNA double helix, which, in its physiological milieu, is characterized by the iconical Watson-Crick nucleo-base pairing. Recent NMR relaxation experiments revealed the transient presence of an alternative, Hoogsteen (HG) base pairing pattern in naked DNA duplexes, and estimated its relative stability and lifetime. In contrast with DNA, such structures were not observed in RNA duplexes. Understanding HG base pairing is important because the underlying "breathing" motion between the two conformations can significantly modulate protein binding. However, a detailed mechanistic insight into the transition pathways and kinetics is still missing. We performed enhanced sampling simulation (with combined metadynamics and adaptive force-bias method) and Markov state modeling to obtain accurate free energy, kinetics, and the intermediates in the transition pathway between Watson-Crick and HG base pairs for both naked B-DNA and A-RNA duplexes. The Markov state model constructed from our unbiased MD simulation data revealed previously unknown complex extrahelical intermediates in the seemingly simple process of base flipping in B-DNA. Extending our calculation to A-RNA, for which HG base pairing is not observed experimentally, resulted in relatively unstable, single-hydrogen-bonded, distorted Hoogsteen-like bases. Unlike B-DNA, the transition pathway primarily involved base paired and intrahelical intermediates with transition timescales much longer than that of B-DNA. The seemingly obvious flip-over reaction coordinate (i.e., the glycosidic torsion angle) is unable to resolve the intermediates. Instead, a multidimensional picture involving backbone dihedral angles and distance between hydrogen bond donor and acceptor atoms is required to gain insight into the molecular mechanism.
Copyright © 2020 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32946766      PMCID: PMC7642241          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  72 in total

1.  Separation of a mixture of independent signals using time delayed correlations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-06-06       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Biochemical evidence for the requirement of Hoogsteen base pairing for replication by human DNA polymerase iota.

Authors:  Robert E Johnson; Louise Prakash; Satya Prakash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Barriers to ion translocation in cationic and anionic receptors from the Cys-loop family.

Authors:  Ivaylo Ivanov; Xiaolin Cheng; Steven M Sine; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Molecular simulation of ab initio protein folding for a millisecond folder NTL9(1-39).

Authors:  Vincent A Voelz; Gregory R Bowman; Kyle Beauchamp; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Prinz; Hao Wu; Marco Sarich; Bettina Keller; Martin Senne; Martin Held; John D Chodera; Christof Schütte; Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  New insights into Hoogsteen base pairs in DNA duplexes from a structure-based survey.

Authors:  Huiqing Zhou; Bradley J Hintze; Isaac J Kimsey; Bharathwaj Sathyamoorthy; Shan Yang; Jane S Richardson; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Path finding on high-dimensional free energy landscapes.

Authors:  Grisell Díaz Leines; Bernd Ensing
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs.

Authors:  Malka Kitayner; Haim Rozenberg; Remo Rohs; Oded Suad; Dov Rabinovich; Barry Honig; Zippora Shakked
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  A modified version of the Cornell et al. force field with improved sugar pucker phases and helical repeat.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; P Cieplak; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1999-02

10.  Insilico direct folding of thrombin-binding aptamer G-quadruplex at all-atom level.

Authors:  Changwon Yang; Mandar Kulkarni; Manho Lim; Youngshang Pak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Transient Hoogsteen Base Pairs Observed in Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA.

Authors:  Rodrigo Galindo-Murillo; Thomas E Cheatham
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.888

2.  Sequence dependence of transient Hoogsteen base pairing in DNA.

Authors:  Alberto Pérez de Alba Ortíz; Jocelyne Vreede; Bernd Ensing
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.779

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.