Literature DB >> 32946722

Basic Reproduction Number of Chikungunya Virus Transmitted by Aedes Mosquitoes.

Najmul Haider, Francesco Vairo, Giuseppe Ippolito, Alimuddin Zumla, Richard A Kock.   

Abstract

We estimated the weighted mean basic reproduction number (R0) of chikungunya virus based on outbreak size. R0 was 3.4 (95% CI 2.4-4.2) and varied for 2 primary chikungunya mosquito vectors: 4.1 (95% CI 1.5-6.6) for Aedes aegypti and 2.8 (95% CI 1.8-3.8) for Ae. albopictus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aedes mosquito; Basic reproduction number; R0; arboviruses; chikungunya virus; epidemic; mosquito-borne infections; outbreaks; vector-borne infections; viruses; zoonoses

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32946722      PMCID: PMC7510706          DOI: 10.3201/eid2610.190957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


The basic reproduction number (R0) of an infection is the mean number of secondary cases a single infectious person causes in a completely susceptible population. The magnitude of R0 is used to measure the risk and spread of an epidemic or pandemic. To control an outbreak, the R0 should be reduced to <1 through interventions, such as vaccination. Because little information is available at the beginning of an epidemic, the estimated R0 commonly is used to assess public health preparedness needs, the impact of the possible epidemic, and success of the control measures. Information on R0 often is lacking for emerging diseases like chikungunya, a mosquito-borne viral disease of humans and nonhuman primates. Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a member of the Alphavirus genus (family Togaviridae) transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, primarily Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are aggressive human biters and the main vectors for CHIKV outbreaks in Asia, where epidemics occur primarily in urban settings (). Ae. albopictus mosquitoes, on the other hand, feed from several mammals besides humans and are responsible for CHIKV outbreaks in rural and urban areas in Africa (). CHIKV outbreaks were reported from >100 countries worldwide during 2014–2019 (). Epidemiologic understanding of CHIKV changed after outbreaks on the island of La Réunion in the Indian Ocean during 2005–2006, when Ae. albopictus mosquitoes were identified as the outbreak vector (,). The global expansion of CHIKV partially is attributed to viral adaptation to this new mosquito vector, which facilitated a mutation in the coding for the envelop protein 1 A226V (E1-A226V) gene of CHIKV, increasing the competence of Ae. albopictus mosquitoes to transmit the virus from mosquitoes to humans (–). In humans, CHIV infection is characterized by sudden onset of intense polyarthralgia, high fever, and skin rash. CHIKV causes debilitating joint pain that can limit daily activities and last a few months to several years (); progression to the chronic stage (>3 months) occurs in 4.1%–78.6% of cases (). To estimate R0 of CHIKV outbreaks, we analyzed empirical data on R0 available from open sources.

The Study

We used the search terms “Basic reproduction number” or “R0” AND “chikungunya” to identify published articles from Google Scholar and PubMed. We identified 11 articles describing estimated R0 of CHIKV from outbreak data during 2000–2019. We found 5 articles on outbreaks in Africa, all on La Réunion (,–); 1 on an outbreak in Cambodia (); 2 on outbreaks in Italy (,); and 3 on outbreaks in the Americas (,; N. Báez-Hernández et al. unpub. data, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/122556v1). The authors estimated R0 by using mathematical (compartmental) models fitted with respective outbreak data (,,–). We considered the estimated values comparable and extracted the R0 from each. We then estimated the weighted mean R0 of CHIKV based on outbreak size, such as number of reported cases included in the estimation of R0 in the original article, and further estimated the mean R0 for different mosquito vectors and E1-A226V gene mutations. The largest CHIKV outbreak occurred on La Réunion and affected 266,000 of the 785,000 inhabitants (). Several models with differing levels of data estimated the R0 of the La Réunion outbreaks between 0.89 and 4.1 (,–). The R0 also was estimated from CHIKV outbreaks in Italy in 2007 () and 2017 (), Cambodia in 2012 (), Venezuela in 2014 (), Colombia in 2015 (), and Mexico in 2015 (N. Báez-Hernández et al. unpub. data, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/122556v1) (Table).
Table

The basic reproduction number (R0) of chikungunya virus estimated from empirical outbreak data, 2000–2019

YearCountry or regionContinentR0 range (95% CI)Mosquito speciesLineageE1-A226V mutation*Reference
2006La RéunionAfrica4.1 Ae. albopictus Indian OceanY(3)
2006La Réunion Africa0.9–2.3 Ae. albopictus Indian OceanY(7)
2006La Réunion Africa1.5–1.8 Ae. albopictus Indian OceanY(5)
2006La Réunion Africa3.4 Ae. albopictus Indian OceanY(6)
2006La Réunion Africa3.7 (2–11) Ae. albopictus Indian OceanY(8)
2007ItalyEurope3.3 (1.8–6.0) Ae. albopictus Indian OceanMixed(10)
2012CambodiaAsia6.5 (6.2–6.8) Ae. aegypti AsianY(1)
2014ItalyEurope2.1 (1.5–2.6) Ae. albopictus Indian OceanN(9)
2014VenezuelaSouth America3.7 Ae. aegypti AsianN(11)
2015MexicoNorth America3.44 Ae. aegypti AsianN
2014
Colombia
South America
1–9
Ae. aegypti
Asian
N
(12)
*Envelope 1 A226V gene.
†N. Báez-Hernández et al., unpub data, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/122556v1.
We estimated the weighted mean R0 of CHIKV to be 3.4 (95% CI 2.4–4.2). We analyzed the data and estimated the R0 for Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes separately for outbreaks in which the R0 of CHIKV was described for each species. We estimated the R0 to be 4.1 (95% CI 1.5–6.6) for Ae. aegypti mosquitoes and 2.8 (95% CI 1.8–3.8) for Ae. albopictus mosquitoes. Although the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.12), we expected a lower R0 for outbreaks involving Ae. albopictus mosquitoes because this species also feeds on animals, which might have reduced the attack rate on humans and transmission across the population. However, outbreaks associated with Ae. albopictus mosquitoes can be prolonged and the outbreak response can have economic consequences. We estimated the R0 to be 3.5 (95% CI 1.9–4.9) during outbreaks involving the E1-A226V mutation, which is higher than R0 of 2.1 from the 2017 outbreak in Italy that did not have the gene mutation. CHIKV infections among humans can have severe health consequences, despite the low case fatality rate. CHIKV infection has 3 stages: acute, postacute, and chronic. The acute phase usually lasts for 1–3 weeks and is characterized by fever, intense myalgia, arthralgia, and symmetric joint pain in both legs that can limit even the simplest daily activities. The postacute stage usually lasts 1–3 months after the acute phase and is characterized by persistent inflammatory arthralgia, arthritis, tenosynovitis, and bursitis. The chronic stage starts after 3 months and can last for months to years after acute infection (). In a study in Brazil, >68% of persons with CHIKV remained chronically infected for up to 1 year (). On Réunion Island, a small group of patients had clinical signs for 6 years. Although the reason for persistence is unclear, it might be strain related and associated with the E1-A226V mutation. Therefore, despite being less severe and causing fewer deaths than other mosquitoborne diseases, CHIKV can have lingering physical and psychological consequences for those affected. Infected persons also can experience economic consequences because they might not be able to work for several weeks or more. R0 does not remain constant. For arboviruses, R0 can vary based on the density of hosts and vectors; mosquito species, survival, and biting rate; and vector competence and capacity, all of which can depend on environmental and microclimatic factors. Further, the vector competence of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes for CHIKV might be different from that for Ae. albopictus mosquitoes, which could influence outbreak dynamics. For example, 1 study reported the transmission efficiency of Ae. albopictus mosquitoes as 97% and of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes as 83% (). The outbreaks included in our study occurred in tropical and subtropical countries and in the more temperate climate of Italy. We did not consider climatic conditions during reported outbreaks, which might play a role in determining the size and R0 of CHIKV outbreaks. We also did not consider the variation of data quality in published articles, except for the outbreak size, which might affect estimated R0. However, defining adjustments for data quality would have been difficult and might have introduced unwanted bias.

Conclusions

We found the overall mean R0 for CHIKV was 3.4 (95% CI 2.4–4.2). Our estimated R0 of 4.1 (95% CI 1.5–6.6) for Ae. aegypti mosquitoes suggests CHIKV could spread rapidly and cause high disease incidence in urban areas, where this species thrives. Our estimated CHIKV R0 for Ae. albopictus mosquitoes of 2.8 (95% CI 1.5–6.6) was lower than for Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. In rural areas, where Ae. albopictus mosquitoes are more prevalent, sylvatic cycles, maintenance of biodiversity including natural mosquito populations, and presence of hosts other than humans might reduce the effects of an outbreak. Early interventions targeting Aedes mosquitoes will be vital to controlling CHIKV outbreaks.
  14 in total

1.  Approximation of the basic reproduction number R0 for vector-borne diseases with a periodic vector population.

Authors:  Nicolas Bacaër
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 2.  Prevalence of Post-Chikungunya Infection Chronic Inflammatory Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alfonso J Rodríguez-Morales; Jaime A Cardona-Ospina; Sivia Fernanda Urbano-Garzón; Juan Sebastian Hurtado-Zapata
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  High level of vector competence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from ten American countries as a crucial factor in the spread of Chikungunya virus.

Authors:  Anubis Vega-Rúa; Karima Zouache; Romain Girod; Anna-Bella Failloux; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Vector control for the Chikungunya disease.

Authors:  Yves Dumont; Frederic Chiroleu
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 5.  Chikungunya: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, Management, and Prevention.

Authors:  Francesco Vairo; Najmul Haider; Richard Kock; Francine Ntoumi; Giuseppe Ippolito; Alimuddin Zumla
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.982

6.  Transmission potential of chikungunya virus and control measures: the case of Italy.

Authors:  Piero Poletti; Gianni Messeri; Marco Ajelli; Roberto Vallorani; Caterina Rizzo; Stefano Merler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Correlation of the basic reproduction number (R0) and eco-environmental variables in Colombian municipalities with chikungunya outbreaks during 2014-2016.

Authors:  Víctor Hugo Peña-García; Rebecca C Christofferson
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-11-07

8.  A mathematical model of chikungunya dynamics and control: the major epidemic on Réunion Island.

Authors:  Laith Yakob; Archie C A Clements
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transmission dynamics of the ongoing chikungunya outbreak in Central Italy: from coastal areas to the metropolitan city of Rome, summer 2017.

Authors:  Mattia Manica; Giorgio Guzzetta; Piero Poletti; Federico Filipponi; Angelo Solimini; Beniamino Caputo; Alessandra Della Torre; Roberto Rosà; Stefano Merler
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2017-11

10.  Seroprevalence of Chikungunya Virus after Its Emergence in Brazil.

Authors:  Juarez P Dias; Maria da Conceição N Costa; Gubio Soares Campos; Enny S Paixão; Marcio S Natividade; Florisneide R Barreto; Martha Suely C Itaparica; Cristina Goes; Francisca L S Oliveira; Eloisa B Santana; Neusa S J Silva; Carlos A A Brito; Laura C Rodrigues; Silvia Inez Sardi; Ramon C Saavedra; Maria Glória Teixeira
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  1 in total

1.  Visualization of conformational changes and membrane remodeling leading to genome delivery by viral class-II fusion machinery.

Authors:  Vidya Mangala Prasad; Jelle S Blijleven; Jolanda M Smit; Kelly K Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 17.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.