Literature DB >> 32946172

ARPEGES: A Bayesian Belief Network to Assess the Risk of Pesticide Contamination for the River Network of France.

Jeremy Piffady1, Nadia Carluer2, Veronique Gouy2, Guy le Henaff2, Thierry Tormos1,3, Nolwenn Bougon1,4, Emilie Adoir2, Katell Mellac1.   

Abstract

Pesticides are priority concerns in aquatic risk assessment due to their widespread use, ongoing development of new molecules, and potential effects from short- and long-term exposures to aquatic life. Water quality assessments are also challenged by contrasting pesticide behaviors (e.g., mobility, half-life time, solubility) in different environmental contexts. Furthermore, monitoring networks are not well adapted to the pesticide media transfer dynamics and therefore fail at providing a reliable assessment of pesticides. We present here a Bayesian belief network that was developed in a cooperative process between researchers specializing in Bayesian modelling, soil sciences, agronomy, and diffuse pollutants to provide a tool for stakeholders to assess surface water contamination by pesticides. It integrates knowledge on dominant transfer pathways according to basin physical context and climate for different pesticides properties, such as half-life duration and affinity to organic C, to develop an assessment of risks of contamination for every watershed in France. The resulting model, ARPEGES (Analyse de Risque PEsticide pour la Gestion des Eaux de Surface; trans. Risk analysis of contamination by pesticides for surface water management), was developed in R. A user-friendly R interface was built to enable stakeholders to not only obtain ARPEGES' results, but also freely use it to test management scenarios. Though it is applicable to any chemical, its results are illustrated for S-Metolachlor, a pesticide that was widely used on cereals crops worldwide. In addition to providing contamination potential, ARPEGES also provides a way to diagnose its main explaining factors, enabling stakeholders to focus efforts in the most potentially affected basins, but also on the most probable cause of contamination. In this context, the Bayesian belief network allowed us to use information at different scales (i.e., regional contexts for climate, pedology at the basin scale, pesticide use at the municipality scale) to provide an expert assessment of the processes driving pesticide contamination of streams and the associated uncertainties. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;00:1-14.
© 2020 SETAC. © 2020 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confidence index; Contamination potential; Expert Bayesian belief network; Flow pathways; Pesticide environmental behavior

Year:  2020        PMID: 32946172     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  1 in total

1.  Increased Use of Bayesian Network Models Has Improved Environmental Risk Assessments.

Authors:  S Jannicke Moe; John F Carriger; Miriam Glendell
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.084

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.