Kenya Kusunose1, Kosuke Matsunaga2, Hirotsugu Yamada3, Masataka Sata2. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, 2-50-1 Kuramoto, Tokushima, Japan. kusunosek@tokushima-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, 2-50-1 Kuramoto, Tokushima, Japan. 3. Department of Community Medicine for Cardiology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic worldwide [1]. One possible mechanism for the spread of this virus is an aerial transmission via droplets generated during speech. In the setting of echocardiography, the risk of infection is particularly high because observers must be in close proximity to the patient. Thus, personal protection is crucial in the COVID-19 era [2]. An important infection prevention method is equipment care. The machine console is where the observer touches the most, but the extent of where droplets could possibly spread is not well examined. The aim of this study was to identify the extent of oral fluid droplet spread on echocardiographic machine consoles, after observers were speaking in English or Japanese.
Methods
To count the droplets generated during speech on the console, we utilized liquid riboflavin (vitamin B2). Adding 1 tablet riboflavin (14 mg) to water (150 ml) and mixing it created a liquid which emitted bright green light when exposed to handheld ultraviolet lamps (365 nm). Two observers without surgical masks repeated the words “inhale, exhale, hold” (the words often used during examinations) in English and Japanese, in front of echocardiographic machine (EUB-7500, Hitachi Medical Corporation, Japan) after ingesting the liquid with volunteers lying on your left side echocardiography. The distance between the observer’s face and the echocardiographic machine console was 50–60 cm. The surface of the console was divided into 16 equal segments, and droplets were counted in each part. This process was repeated ten times for each observer and the droplets were counted. Continuous data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Finally, two observers with surgical masks repeated the same words to check the droplets on the surface of the console. We compared the number of droplets between English and Japanese using an unpaired Student’s t-test. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and the figure was made by Origin Software 2020b (Lightstone Corp., Tokyo, Japan). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
When surgical masks were not worn, the total counts of droplets were 682 for Japanese and 717 for English, with no significant difference in the counts of droplets for each segment between the two languages (Table 1 all p > 0.05). Figure 1a shows the examples of droplets with fluorescent lamp and ultraviolet lamp. All droplets were clearly detected by the ultraviolet lamp and many droplets (over 20 counts) were observed after three repetitions of the same speech. Figure 1b shows the distribution map for the droplets on the console of ultrasound machine. The place where most droplets were counted was at the front right side in both languages. The droplets after English speech reached slightly farther than those after Japanese.
Table 1
Averaged number of droplets on the console of the ultrasound machine when surgical masks were not worn
English
Japanese
p value
Segment 1
4.1 ± 2.9
3.9 ± 1.6
0.74
Segment 2
7.8 ± 4.7
7.9 ± 3.2
0.94
Segment 3
6.2 ± 3.4
5.6 ± 3.1
0.54
Segment 4
2.9 ± 2.5
3.8 ± 2.6
0.30
Segment 5
1.5 ± 1.7
1.6 ± 1.5
0.84
Segment 6
3.5 ± 2.0
4.0 ± 2.5
0.49
Segment 7
2.5 ± 1.8
2.3 ± 1.3
0.70
Segment 8
1.3 ± 1.3
1.2 ± 1.2
0.80
Segment 9
0.8 ± 1.4
0.7 ± 0.9
0.78
Segment 10
1.1 ± 1.6
1.7 ± 1.8
0.26
Segment 11
1.1 ± 1.1
1.1 ± 1.4
0.90
Segment 12
0.3 ± 0.6
0.5 ± 0.8
0.38
Segment 13
0.2 ± 0.5
0.1 ± 0.3
0.70
Segment 14
0.7 ± 0.9
0.9 ± 1.2
0.66
Segment 15
0.3 ± 0.7
0.7 ± 0.9
0.11
Segment 16
0.1 ± 0.3
0.2 ± 0.4
0.39
Fig. 1
Examples of droplets (white arrows) with ultraviolet lamp (a) and the distribution map for droplets on the console of the ultrasound machine in English and Japanese (b), when surgical masks were not worn
Averaged number of droplets on the console of the ultrasound machine when surgical masks were not wornExamples of droplets (white arrows) with ultraviolet lamp (a) and the distribution map for droplets on the console of the ultrasound machine in English and Japanese (b), when surgical masks were not wornIt was also important that no droplets were detected on the console when surgical masks were worn in this setting, although it is unlikely that examinations would be performed with either the sonographer/cardiologist scanning or the patient not wearing a mask in the current COVID era.
Discussion
The main findings of this study were (1) many droplets were spread by speech, with the front right side of the console particularly contaminated; (2) there was no significant difference for the count of droplets between English and Japanese; (3) mask usage can significantly cut down droplet spreading by speech. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to assess the spread of the droplets generated by speech on the surface of an echocardiographic machine using visualized methods. The recent study showed that the “th” sound in the word “healthy” was a significant generator of speech droplets [3]. In our study, the “ex” sound in the word “exhale” and the “d” sound in the word “hold” easily generate droplets. We may need to pay attention to what or how we speak when performing echocardiographic exams.Our model assessed the potential of dispersing viruses by sonographer or echocardiography with COVID-19 in front of the echo machine. We could not assess the droplets generated during speech by patientsinfected with COVID-19. Although the real object of interest would be droplet reach/distribution emanating from the patient, the actual spread range of the droplets exhaled by the patient remains unclear. We did not assess aerosols because special tools are needed to visually detect micro-sized droplets. Considering the existence of smaller droplets and aerosols, the actual reach of droplets can expect to be much wider in the clinical setting.The important thing is that all personnel involved in performing the echocardiogram of a patient with COVID-19 or at risk for having COVID-19 wear masks in addition to other personal protective equipment. When they and the patient are wearing masks, there is reduced risk of the passage of the droplets that our experiment generates.In conclusions, sonographers, physicians, and all other medical staff should strive to decrease their infection risk in the echocardiographic laboratory [4]. Based on our results, it is important to keep the following points in mind when performing echocardiography. (1) The examinations should be performed while wearing a mask. (2) Avoid unnecessary conversation. (3) The contamination area is mainly at the front right side of console.