PURPOSE: To describe clinical outcomes of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using sutureless trans-scleral techniques in surgically complex eyes. METHODS: Retrospective surgical case series of 45 eyes that underwent secondary IOL implantation using a sutureless haptic flange technique. Demographic data of age, sex, primary diagnosis, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, intraocular pressure, full ophthalmic exam findings, surgical approach, and any intraoperative complications were noted. RESULTS: The most common indication for secondary IOL implantation was aphakia, most commonly after ocular trauma. The primary outcome measures were pre-operative and post-operative BCVA, which revealed recovery of pre-operative vision levels by post-operative week 1 and improved vision by post-operative month 1 (p = 0.03). Secondary outcome measures of target refraction pre-operatively and post-operatively revealed significant reduction in post-operative spherical equivalent to achieve BCVA (p < 0.001). Targeting of the secondary IOLs using Barrett Universal II, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T all exhibited a hyperopic shift post-operatively in post-traumatic aphakic eyes and a myopic shift in the post complicated cataract extraction eyes. No intraoperative adverse events were noted. The most common post-operative complication was transient IOP elevation, with most patients completing 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: There is rapid visual rehabilitation and reduction of spherical equivalent correction to attain BCVA in eyes with a history of ocular trauma that undergo secondary IOL implantation using a trans-scleral flange technique. Moreover, this study highlights that a specific IOL power formula can be more predictive of the desired refractive outcome depending on the indication for secondary IOL implantation.
PURPOSE: To describe clinical outcomes of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using sutureless trans-scleral techniques in surgically complex eyes. METHODS: Retrospective surgical case series of 45 eyes that underwent secondary IOL implantation using a sutureless haptic flange technique. Demographic data of age, sex, primary diagnosis, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, intraocular pressure, full ophthalmic exam findings, surgical approach, and any intraoperative complications were noted. RESULTS: The most common indication for secondary IOL implantation was aphakia, most commonly after ocular trauma. The primary outcome measures were pre-operative and post-operative BCVA, which revealed recovery of pre-operative vision levels by post-operative week 1 and improved vision by post-operative month 1 (p = 0.03). Secondary outcome measures of target refraction pre-operatively and post-operatively revealed significant reduction in post-operative spherical equivalent to achieve BCVA (p < 0.001). Targeting of the secondary IOLs using Barrett Universal II, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T all exhibited a hyperopic shift post-operatively in post-traumatic aphakic eyes and a myopic shift in the post complicated cataract extraction eyes. No intraoperative adverse events were noted. The most common post-operative complication was transient IOP elevation, with most patients completing 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: There is rapid visual rehabilitation and reduction of spherical equivalent correction to attain BCVA in eyes with a history of ocular trauma that undergo secondary IOL implantation using a trans-scleral flange technique. Moreover, this study highlights that a specific IOL power formula can be more predictive of the desired refractive outcome depending on the indication for secondary IOL implantation.