Siddharth A Padia1, Guy E Johnson2, Vatche G Agopian3, Joseph DiNorcia3, Ravi N Srinivasa1, James Sayre4, David S Shin2. 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the outcomes of Yttrium-90 (90 Y) radiation segmentectomy for hepatic metastases unamenable to resection or ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 6 years, 36 patients with 53 tumors underwent segmental radioembolization. Patients were not candidates for surgical resection or thermal ablation. Malignancies included metastases from colorectal cancer (31%), neuroendocrine tumors (28%), sarcoma (19%), and others (22%). Eighty-one percent of patients had undergone prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy. Ongoing systemic chemotherapy was continued. Toxicity, tumor response, tumor progression, and survival were assessed. RESULTS: The median tumor size was 3.6 cm (range 1.2-6.1 cm). Adverse event rates were low, with no hepatic-related Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Target tumor Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors disease control rate was 92% (28% partial response, 64% stable disease). For patients with enhancing tumors (n = 14), modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors target tumor objective response rate was 100%. During a median follow-up of 12 months, target tumor progression occurred in 28% of treated tumors. Overall survival was 96% and 83% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 90 Y radiation segmentectomy for hepatic metastases demonstrates high rates of tumor control and minimal toxicity. Radiation segmentectomy should be considered for patients with metastatic hepatic malignancy who are not candidates for surgical resection.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the outcomes of Yttrium-90 (90 Y) radiation segmentectomy for hepatic metastases unamenable to resection or ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 6 years, 36 patients with 53 tumors underwent segmental radioembolization. Patients were not candidates for surgical resection or thermal ablation. Malignancies included metastases from colorectal cancer (31%), neuroendocrine tumors (28%), sarcoma (19%), and others (22%). Eighty-one percent of patients had undergone prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy. Ongoing systemic chemotherapy was continued. Toxicity, tumor response, tumor progression, and survival were assessed. RESULTS: The median tumor size was 3.6 cm (range 1.2-6.1 cm). Adverse event rates were low, with no hepatic-related Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Target tumor Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors disease control rate was 92% (28% partial response, 64% stable disease). For patients with enhancing tumors (n = 14), modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors target tumor objective response rate was 100%. During a median follow-up of 12 months, target tumor progression occurred in 28% of treated tumors. Overall survival was 96% and 83% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 90 Y radiation segmentectomy for hepatic metastases demonstrates high rates of tumor control and minimal toxicity. Radiation segmentectomy should be considered for patients with metastatic hepatic malignancy who are not candidates for surgical resection.
Authors: Mary F Mulcahy; Armeen Mahvash; Marc Pracht; Amir H Montazeri; Steve Bandula; Robert C G Martin; Ken Herrmann; Ewan Brown; Darryl Zuckerman; Gregory Wilson; Tae-You Kim; Andrew Weaver; Paul Ross; William P Harris; Janet Graham; Jamie Mills; Alfonso Yubero Esteban; Matthew S Johnson; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Siddharth A Padia; Robert J Lewandowski; Etienne Garin; Philip Sinclair; Riad Salem Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert J Lewandowski; Beau B Toskich; Daniel B Brown; Ghassan El-Haddad; Siddharth A Padia Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 2.797
Authors: I Kurilova; A Bendet; E K Fung; E N Petre; J L Humm; F E Boas; C H Crane; N Kemeny; T P Kingham; A Cercek; M I D'Angelica; R G H Beets-Tan; C T Sofocleous Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-02-19
Authors: M Weber; M Lam; C Chiesa; M Konijnenberg; M Cremonesi; P Flamen; S Gnesin; L Bodei; T Kracmerova; M Luster; E Garin; K Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 9.236