| Literature DB >> 32944577 |
Mohammad Ali Ashja Zadeh1, Mohsen Ebrahimi2, Amir Ahmad Salarian2, Seyyed Reza Abtahi2, Alireza Jahandideh3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the wound healing activity of Crocus pallasii subsp. haussknechtii boiss leaves extract on infected wounds in diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: Crocus pallasii subsp. haussknechtii boiss; Diabetes; Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); Wound healing
Year: 2020 PMID: 32944577 PMCID: PMC7468216 DOI: 10.30476/BEAT.2020.82567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull Emerg Trauma ISSN: 2322-2522
Wound bacterial count in experimental groups on tow time points of day 7 and day 14
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
|
| 1290.32 ± 260.10 | 1070.81 ± 220.19 |
|
| 1270.55 ± 220.85 | 980.65 ± 220.37 |
|
| 1030.52 ± 280.27 | 970.34 ± 270.54 |
|
| 381.19 ± 40.25b | 181.14 ± 47.21* |
a CFU: Colony-forming units; bP<0.05 vs. groups III and IV.
Area (mm2) in animals of experimental groups. Values are given as mean ± SEM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 114.45±2.0 | 80.30±2.15 | 62.71±2.60 | 4.32±1.70 |
|
| 115.70±1.30 | 91.20±2.15 | 81.30±2.48 | 60.72±1.84 |
|
| 115.32±2.40 | 88.37±2.15 | 79.43±2.03 | 59.32±1.71 |
|
| 114.50±2.50 | 76.68±2.50 | 69.17±2.72 | 50.93±1.48 |
|
| 115.03±2.10 | 62.55±2.25a | 42.85±2.68 a | 33.75±1.84 a |
The treated groups are compared by Student t test with other groups; a: The mean difference is significant at the .05 level vs II - IV. (Kruskal–Wallis test).
Fig. 1Serial representative photographs of the wounds from day 0 to day 21 in experimental groups
Biomechanical indices assessed for each of the experimental groups. Values are given as mean ± SEM
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.32 ± 0.12 | 1.17 ± 0.18 | 1.12 ± 0.24 | 1.33 ± 0.15 |
|
| 0.47 ± 0.15 | 0.77 ± 0.12 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | 0.65 ± 0.16 |
|
| 0.67 ± 0.10 | 0.81 ± 0.12 | 0.70 ± 0.19 | 0.92 ± 0.28 |
|
| 0.98 ± 0.10 | 0.94 ± 0.17 | 0.78 ± 0.18 | 1.12 ± 0.24 |
|
| 1.69 ± 0.17b | 1.55 ± 0.12 b | 1.48 ± 0.19 b | 1.77 ± 0.35 b |
aMES: Maximum Stored Energy; bThe mean difference is significant at the .05 level vs Grpous II-IV
Evaluation of Intensity of histological parameters in experimental groups
|
|
|
|
|
| Histological Parameters | ||||||||||
| Day 21 | Day 14 | Day 7 | Day 21 | Day 14 | Day 7 | Day 21 | Day 14 | Day 7 | Day 21 | Day 14 | Day 7 | Day 21 | Day 14 | Day 7 | |
| 0* | 0* | 1* | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
|
| 0* | 0* | 1* | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
|
| 4* | 4* | 3* | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|
| 4* | 3* | 2* | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 4* | 4* | 2* | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
|
Classification of histological parameters according to the intensity of occurrence: 0 absence; 1 discrete; 2 moderate; 3 intense; 4 very intense. Histopatological damages were assessed as explained under material and methods on days, 7, 14 and 21 of lesion.*P<0.05 vs. groups III and IV.
Fig. 2Box-plot indicating number of polymorphnuclear cells (PMN) in excisional model of the rat skin in experimental groups
Fig. 3Bar graph indicating number of mononuclear cells (MNC) in excisional model of the rat skin in experimental groups. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05 vs. other experimental groups
Fig. 4Box-plot indicating number of fibroblasts in excisional model of the rat skin in experimental groups
Fig. 5Representative micrographs of histological characteristics of rat skin on day 14 after wound creation in excisional wound model. a: Group I, b: Group II, c: Group III, d: Group IV and e: Group V. Masson trichrome staining (×400)
Comparison of the activities of MDA, SOD, GST and carbonyl proteins in the tissue samples taken from experimental groups on days 7, 14 and 21. Data are expressed as Mean ± SD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| 0.070 ± 0.015 | 0.065 ± 0.017 | 0.062 ± 0.015* | 0.064 ± 0.013 | 0.067 ± 0.015 d |
|
| 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.83 ± 0.27 | 7.85 ± 0.15 | 7.97 ± 0.11 | 5.86 ± 0.14 d |
|
| 0.43 ± 0.17 | 0.48 ± 0.15 | 0.49 ± 0.12 | 0.44 ± 0.15 | 0.43 ± 0.17 |
| Carbonyl Proteins | 73.40 ± 6.12 | 75.38 ± 5.55 | 64.30 ± 4.12 | 75.42 ± 4.55 | 22.81 ± 3.60 d |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.080 ± 0.15 | 0.073 ± 0.011 | 0.064 ± 0.018 | 0.066 ± 0.014 | 0.059 ± 0.010 d |
|
| 0.63 ± 0.05 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.63 ± 0.12 | 0.74 ± 0.14 | 1.20 ± 0.15 d |
|
| 0.48 ± 0.15 | 0.46 ±0.10 | 0.45 ± 0.15 | 0.45 ± 0.17 | 0.40 ± 0.12 |
| Carbonyl Proteins (nmol/mL) | 75.60± 4.80 | 73.69 ± 4.35 | 65.33 ± 4.40 | 67.88 ± 4.19 | 23.60 ± 4.70 d |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.095 ± 0.023 | 0.084 ± 0.012 | 0.076 ± 0.010 | 0.078 ± 0.015 | 0.037 ± 0.015 d |
|
| 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 0.21 ± 0.15 | 0.23 ± 0.37 | 0.26 ± 0.23 |
|
| 0.47 ± 0.15 | 0.45 ± 0.15 | 0.46 ± 0.18 | 0.44 ± 0.12 | 0.49 ± 0.18 |
| Carbonyl Proteins | 27.33 ± 4.75 | 25.78± 4.10 | 24.54 ± 3.20 | 21.70 ± 3.37 | 15.55 ± 3.38 d |
aMDA: Malondialdehyde; bSOD: Superoxide dismutase; cGST: Glutathione S-transferase, d P<0.05 vs. groups IV and III.