Literature DB >> 32944541

Incidence and preoperative predictors for major complications following radical nephroureterectomy.

Neil J Kocher1, David Canes2, Karim Bensalah3, Morgan Roupret4, Costas Lallas5, Vitaly Margulis6, Shahrokh Shariat7, Pierre Colin8, Surena Matin9, Chad Tracy10, Evanguelos Xylinas11, Andrew Wagner12, Mathieu Roumiguie13, Wassim Kassouf14, Tobias Klatte7, Jay D Raman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the referent standard for managing bulky, invasive, or high grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The UTUC patient population, however, generally harbor medical comorbidities thereby placing them at risk of surgical complications. This study reviews a large international cohort of RNU patients to define the risk of major complications and preoperative factors associated with their occurrence.
METHODS: Patients undergoing RNU at 14 academic medical centers between 2002 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative clinical, demographic, operative, and comorbidity indices were recorded. The modified Clavien-Dindo index was used to grade complications occurring within 30 days of surgery. The association between preoperative variables and major complications occurring after RNU was determined by multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: One thousand two hundred and sixty-six patients (707 men; 559 women) with a median age of 70 years and BMI of 27 kg/m2 were included. Over three-quarters of the cohort was white, 50.1% had baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) ≥ stage III, 22.4% had a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score >5, and 17.1% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2. Overall, 413 (32.6%) experienced a complication including 103 (8.1%) with a major event. Specific distribution of major complications included 49 Clavien III, 44 Clavien IV, and 10 Clavien V. On univariate analysis, patient age (P=0.006), hypertension (P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (P=0.023), CKD stage (P<0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P=0.022), ECOG (P<0.001), and CCI (P<0.001) all were associated with major complications. On multivariate analysis, ECOG ≥2 (OR 2.38, 95% CI, 1.46-3.90), P=0.001), CCI >5 (OR 3.45, 95% CI, 1.41-8.33, P=0.007), and CKD stage ≥3 (OR 3.64, P=0.008) were independently associated with major complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Major complications following RNU occurred in almost 10% of patients. Impaired preoperative performance status and baseline CKD are preoperative variables associated with these major post-surgical adverse event. These easily measurable indices warrant consideration and discussion prior to proceeding with RNU. 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); chronic kidney disease (CKD); major complications; performance status; radical nephroureterectomy (RNU)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32944541      PMCID: PMC7475660          DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.01.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


Introduction

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon genitourinary cancer that accounts for only 5% of all urothelial tumors (1). UTUC is three times more common in men (than women) and primarily affects elderly patients with peak incidence occurring after the 7th decade of life (2,3). Known risk factors for UTUC include smoking, cyclophosphamide use, aristolochic acid exposure, occupational hazards, chronic inflammation, and a history of bladder cancer (3). UTUC is particularly aggressive, with high rates of recurrence and progression, with over 60% of patients presenting with muscle invasion at time of diagnosis (4,5). Tumor stage and grade are the most established and reproducible prognostic factors in patients with UTUC (5,6). Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for management of bulky, invasive, or high grade UTUC with overall 5-year recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival probabilities of 69% and 73%, respectively (6). Endoscopic ablative techniques are an attractive option in select patients with pathologic low-grade and/or low burden UTUC, or in patients unable to tolerate extirpative surgery. There are, however, no randomized clinical trials comparing endoscopic management with RNU. Admittedly, those patients treated endoscopically have higher rates of ipsilateral upper-tract recurrence as well as bladder cancer (7). Nonetheless, up to 38% of patients of RNU patients develop a complication, and prior retrospective studies have identified a significant reduction in mean GFR, thereby limiting the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced disease (8,9). Associated GFR decline further increases the potential for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Many patients undergoing RNU are older and harbor multiple comorbidities which place them at increased risk for postoperative complications. Preoperative nomograms have been constructed to better objectify the risk associated with RNU (9). This prior work has focused on all complications events that a patient may experience. Yet, the association between preoperatively measured patient-specific factors and major complications following RNU (which likely will impact convalescence and recovery) is less clear. This study reviews a multi-center cohort of RNU patients to identify the incidence of major complications as well as preoperative risk factors for their occurrence. Such information may improve patient counseling as well as present evidence to encourage less invasive treatment options when appropriate and applicable.

Methods

The charts of 1,266 patients with clinically localized, non-metastatic, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing RNU at 14 academic medical centers between 2002 and 2015 were reviewed. RNU was performed via either an open or minimally invasive approach with regional lymphadenectomy and specific bladder cuff management at the discretion of the operating surgeon. All specimens were confirmed as urothelial carcinoma on pathologic review. Preoperative clinical, demographic, and select patient-specific comorbidities were collected for analysis. Perioperative complications occurring within 30 days of surgery were graded using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification scale (10). The number, type, and severity of all complications were included. In accordance with standard reporting scales, major complications were classified as Clavien grade ≥ III, while minor complications were Clavien grade ≤ II. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis determined the association between preoperative variables and Clavien III or greater post-RNU complications. A multivariable model included all possible preoperative predictors, including age, race, gender, ECOG performance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index, individual comorbidities, and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Importantly, in this study, we specifically focused on preoperative patient characteristics as opposed to surgical approach or intraoperative events. The rationale was to specifically provide information to practicing urologists regarding preoperative baseline comorbidities which could be ascertained in the office which would impact patient outcomes following RNU. A P value of <0.05 was set as significance.

Results

highlights the clinicopathologic characteristics of those patients undergoing RNU. A total of 1,266 patients (707 men and 559 women) with a median age of 70 years and body mass index of 27 kg/m2 were included. Over three-quarters of the cohort was Caucasian, approximately 50% had an ASA score >3, 22% had a CCI score >5, and 17% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2. Of those patients included, 54.3% had hypertension, 50.1% had baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage III or worse, 37.3% had hyperlipidemia, 20.8% had coronary artery disease, 17.1% had diabetes mellitus, and 14% had baseline pulmonary disease. Only 7.1% of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patient cohort undergoing radical nephroureterectomy

VariableTotal (n=1,266)
Age, years, Median (range)70 (62–77)
BMI, kg/m2, Median (range)27 (24–30)
Race, n (%)
   White998 (78.8)
   Black195 (15.4)
   Other73 (5.8)
Gender, n (%)
   Male707 (55.8)
   Female559 (44.2)
ASA score, n (%)
   1–2592 (48.3)
   3–4628 (51.2)
   Missing46 (3.6)
ECOG, n (%)
   0–1949 (75.0)
   2–4216 (17.1)
   Missing101 (8.0)
Charlson comorbidity index, n (%)
   0–166 (5.2)
   2–3432 (34.1)
   4–5391 (30.9)
   >5284 (22.4)
   Missing93 (7.3)
Pulmonary disease, n (%)
   No1,063 (84.0)
   Yes171 (13.5)
   Missing32 (2.5)
CAD, n (%)
   No969 (76.5)
   Yes263 (20.8)
   Missing34 (2.7)
Hypertension, n (%)
   No547 (43.2)
   Yes687 (54.3)
   Missing32 (2.5)
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)
   No1,017 (80.3)
   Yes216 (17.1)
   Missing33 (2.6)
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)
   No761 (60.1)
   Yes472 (37.3)
   Missing33 (2.6)
CKD stage, n (%)
   1150 (11.8)
   2473 (37.4)
   3–5634 (50.1)
   Missing9 (0.7)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, n (%)
   No1,172 (92.6)
   Yes90 (7.1)
   Missing4 (0.3)
Complication, n (%)
   No853 (67.4)
   Yes413 (32.6)
   Major (≥III)103 (8.1)
Major complication (Clavien ≥ III), n (%)
   Clavien III49 (47.6)
   Clavien IV44 (42.7)
   Clavien V10 (9.7)

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CKD, chronic kidney disease.

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CKD, chronic kidney disease. Four hundred and thirteen patients (32.6%) experienced a complication including 103 (8.1%) patients with a major (Clavien grade III or higher) complication. The specific distribution of major complications included 49 Clavien III (47.6%), 44 Clavien IV (42.7%), and 10 Clavien V (9.7%) adverse events. The distribution of major complications included bleeding/hemorrhage (n=22; 21%), hematologic (n=20; 19%), gastrointestinal (n=19, 18%), infectious (n=19; 18%), cardiovascular (n=16; 16%), and pulmonary (n=7; 7%). Hematologic complications were predominantly venous thrombosis (n=9) or pulmonary embolism (n=7), Gastrointestinal complications included bowel obstruction (n=10), prolonged ileus (n=7), and perforated viscus (n=2). summarizes the univariate model for major complications in patients following RNU. On univariate analysis, patient age (P=0.006), performance status indices [ASA score (P=0.022), ECOG (P<0.001), CCI (P<0.001)], hypertension (P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (P=0.023), and CKD stage (P<0.001) were all associated with major complications. Conversely, major complications were not associated with increased BMI (P=0.251), race (P=0.320), gender (P=0.349), pulmonary disease (P=0.547), coronary artery disease (P=0.536), hyperlipidemia (P=0.176), or receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.609).
Table 2

Univariate model for preoperative variables associated with major complications following radical nephroureterectomy

VariableTotal (n=1,266)No major complication (n=1,163)Major complication (n=103)P value
Age, years, Median (range)70 (62–77)70 (62–77)74 (65–79)0.006
BMI, kg/m2, Median (range)27 (24–30)27 (24–30)27 (24–31)0.251
Race, n (%)
   White998 (78.8)917 (91.9)81 (8.1)0.320
   Black195 (15.4)182 (93.3)13 (6.7)
   Other73 (5.8)64 (87.7)9 (12.3)
Gender, n (%)
   Male707 (55.8)654 (92.5)53 (7.5)0.349
   Female559 (44.2)509 (91.1)50 (8.9)
ASA score, n (%)
   1–2592 (46.8)554 (93.6)38 (6.4)0.022
   3–4628 (49.6)565 (90.0)63 (10.0)
ECOG, n (%)
   0–1949 (75.0)889 (93.7)60 (6.3)<0.001
   2–4216 (17.1)179 (82.9)37 (17.1)
Charlson comorbidity index, n (%)
   0–166 (5.2)62 (93.9)4 (6.1)<0.001
   2–3432 (34.1)414 (95.8)18 (4.2)
   4–5391 (30.9)351 (89.8)40 (10.2)
   >5284 (22.4)245 (86.3)39 (13.7)
Pulmonary disease, n (%)
   No1063 (84.0)978 (92.0)85 (8.0)0.547
   Yes171 (13.5)155 (90.6)16 (9.4)
Coronary artery disease, n (%)
   No969 (76.5)892 (92.1)77 (7.9)0.536
   Yes263 (20.8)239 (90.9)24 (9.1)
Hypertension, n (%)
   No547 (43.2)517 (94.5)30 (5.5)0.002
   Yes687 (54.3)616 (89.7)71 (10.3)
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)
   No1017 (80.3)942 (92.6)75 (7.4)0.023
   Yes216 (17.1)190 (88.0)26 (12.0)
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)
   No761 (60.1)705 (92.6)56 (7.4)0.176
   Yes472 (37.3)427 (90.5)45 (9.5)
CKD stage, n (%)
   1150 (11.8)141 (94.0)9 (6.0)<0.001
   2473 (37.4)440 (93.0)33 (7.0)
   3–5634 (50.1)554 (87.4)80 (12.6)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, n (%)
   No1172 (92.6)1076 (91.8)96 (8.2)0.609
   Yes90 (7.1)84 (93.3)6 (6.7)

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CKD, chronic kidney disease.

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CKD, chronic kidney disease. highlights the multivariable model for major complications following RNU. On multivariate analysis, ECOG ≥2 (OR 2.38, 95% CI, 1.46–3.90, P=0.001), CCI >5 (OR 3.45, 95% CI, 1.41–8.33, P=0.007), and CKD stage ≥3 (OR 3.64, P=0.008) were independently associated with major complications. Patient age (P=0.422), ASA score (P=0.180), hypertension (P=0.748), and diabetes mellitus (P=0.594), however, were not.
Table 3

Multivariable model for preoperative variables associated with major complications following radical nephroureterectomy

VariableOR95% CIP value
Age, years, continuous1.010.99–1.030.422
BMI, kg/m2, continuous
Race, n (%)
   White
   Black
   Other
Gender, n (%)
   Male
   Female
ASA score, n (%)
   1–21.00
   3–41.420.85–2.370.180
ECOG, n (%)
   0–11.00
   2–42.381.46–3.900.001
Charlson comorbidity index, n (%)
   0–11.00
   2–31.270.53–3.030.596
   4–52.130.92–5.000.080
   >53.451.41–8.330.007
Pulmonary disease, n (%)
   No
   Yes
Coronary artery disease, n (%)
   No
   Yes
Hypertension, n (%)
   No1.00
   Yes1.090.65–1.810.748
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)
   No1.00
   Yes1.160.57–2.040.594
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)
   No
   Yes
CKD stage, n (%)
   11.00
   20.920.41–2.050.837
   3–53.641.39–9.530.008
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, n (%)
   No
   Yes

Model only includes significant variables from univariate analysis. ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CKD, chronic kidney disease.

Model only includes significant variables from univariate analysis. ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CKD, chronic kidney disease.

Discussion

While RNU with excision of ipsilateral bladder cuff is the gold-standard therapy for patients with UTUC and normal contralateral kidney function, there remains a significant risk of perioperative complication due to pre-existing medical comorbidities in this patient population (8,9). In the present study of almost 1,300 patients undergoing RNU at 14 academic medical centers, 413 patients (32.6%) experienced a complication including 103 (8.1%) patients with a Clavien grade III or higher complication. Of these 103 patients with major complications, 49 were Clavien III (47.6%), 44 were Clavien IV (42.7%), and 10 patients suffered Clavien V (9.7%) mortality events. The rate of major complications in this large series is similar to prior studies, but slightly higher than those reported in a systematic review of laparoscopic RNU versus open technique for management of UTUC (4.6% vs. 3.8%, respectively) (11-13). We hypothesize this may be attributable to the inherent case mix bias that is seen at tertiary care academic medical centers. This study identified several patient-specific factors as independent predictors of perioperative complications. On univariate analysis, patient age (P=0.006), ASA score (P=0.022), ECOG performance status (P<0.001), CCI (P<0.001), hypertension (P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (P=0.023), and CKD stage (P<0.001) were all associated with major complications following RNU. On multivariate analysis, only ECOG ≥2 (OR 2.38, P=0.001), CCI >5 (OR 3.45, P=0.007), and CKD stage ≥3 (OR 3.64, P=0.008) were independently associated with major complications. These findings show concordance from observations noted in prior work. Specifically, a previous multi-institutional study with 427 patients determined ECOG performance status was associated with perioperative mortality and worse overall survival (14). Another multi-institutional study involving 731 patients identified patient age, race, ECOG, CCI, and CKD as independent predictive factors of all complications following RNU, and these patient-specific variables were used to construct a preoperative nomogram to predict complications within 30 days for UTUC (9). The results of the current study involving 1,266 patients from 14 academic medical centers highlights performance status and increased CKD stage as independent predictors of major complications following RNU. Other patient-specific factors, including BMI, ASA score, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were not associated with major complications. These observations improve our ability to counsel patients diagnosed with this uncommon malignancy. Indeed, while RNU remains the reference for management of UTUC, urologists must recognize the reality of treatment related morbidity. In that regard, conservative therapies may present a viable (and possibly safer) option in those patients with lower risk disease. Indeed, improved risk stratification and refinements in the ability to deliver adjuvant intracavitary therapies may further enhance the effectiveness of kidney preserving UTUC procedures. We recognize that our analysis focused on preoperative factors that are associated with major complications. Indeed, we elected not to incorporate operative variables such as surgical approach for several reasons. Firstly, in retrospective studies, surgical approach is inherently impacted by surgeon expertise and case selection bias. Indeed, large series from population based administrative datasets provide conflicting data likely due unmeasured factors (15,16). Secondly, we sought to specifically explore factors that could be measured prior to the operative procedure. These factors would be most beneficial in counseling and expectations prior to a decision of a surgical approach. Finally, if one considers surgical approach, then an array of other operative factors merit inclusion such as lymphadenectomy (and extent) and ipsilateral bladder cuff management. Individually, each surgical nuance presents its own associated benefits and risks. Therefore, analysis did not factor these variables. Several limitations of this study warrant mention. The retrospective and multicenter design could contribute to variable accuracy and annotation in grading complications and how these complications are managed at each institution. Secondly, these experiences also reflect academic urologic practices and therefore may be subject to referral bias with regards to surgeon expertise as well as patient comorbidity profile. Nonetheless, despite these limitations, this is the largest cohort to date of UTUC patients undergoing radical surgery and the first to report impaired baseline performance status and increasing CKD stage as independent variables in developing major postoperative complications following RNU.

Conclusions

Major complications occur in 8% of patients undergoing RNU. Impaired preoperative performance status (as determined by ECOG or CCI) and baseline CKD are associated with major postoperative adverse events. These easily measurable indices warrant consideration prior to proceeding with RNU. The article’s supplementary files as
  16 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: a comprehensive review of the current literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Maximilian Burger; Vitaly Margulis; Surena F Matin; Giacomo Novara; Morgan Roupret; Shahrokh F Shariat; Christopher G Wood; Richard Zigeuner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Shaobin Ni; Weiyang Tao; Qiyin Chen; Lianxin Liu; Hongchi Jiang; Hailong Hu; Ruifa Han; Chunyang Wang
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  A Comparison of 30-Day Perioperative Outcomes in Open Versus Minimally Invasive Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Analysis of 896 Patients from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Authors:  Julian Hanske; Alejandro Sanchez; Marianne Schmid; Christian P Meyer; Firas Abdollah; Adam S Feldman; Adam S Kibel; Jesse D Sammon; Mani Menon; Jairam R Eswara; Joachim Noldus; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Zak Rajput; Ashish M Kamat; Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; H Barton Grossman; Colin P N Dinney; Surena F Matin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  A contemporary review of management and prognostic factors of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Anna Orsola; Steven L Chang; Joaquim Bellmunt
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy: A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Sebastiano Nazzani; Amélie Bazinet; Felix Preisser; Elio Mazzone; Zhe Tian; Francesco A Mistretta; Shahrokh F Shariat; Fred Saad; Kevin C Zorn; Emanuele Montanari; Alberto Briganti; Luca Carmignani; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Gender differences in radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Ricardo L Favaretto; Amit Gupta; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Wassim Kassouf; Thomas J Walton; Stefan Tritschler; Shiro Baba; Kazuhito Matsushita; Patrick J Bastian; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Christian Seitz; Armin Pycha; Wolfgang Otto; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Incidence and survival of patients with carcinoma of the ureter and renal pelvis in the USA, 1973-2005.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Jamie Messer; John A Sielatycki; Christopher S Hollenbeak
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2017 Update.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Marko Babjuk; Eva Compérat; Richard Zigeuner; Richard J Sylvester; Maximilian Burger; Nigel C Cowan; Paolo Gontero; Bas W G Van Rhijn; A Hugh Mostafid; Joan Palou; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

1.  Extended length of stay and postoperative complications in octogenarians with hypertension following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Puneet Gupta; Theodore Quan; Chirag J Patel; Alex Gu; Joshua C Campbell
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-01-31

2.  Changes in renal function after nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract carcinoma: analysis of a large multicenter cohort (Radical Nephroureterectomy Outcomes (RaNeO) Research Consortium).

Authors:  Alessandro Tafuri; Michele Marchioni; Clara Cerrato; Andrea Mari; Riccardo Tellini; Katia Odorizzi; Alessandro Veccia; Daniele Amparore; Aliasger Shakir; Umberto Carbonara; Andrea Panunzio; Federica Trovato; Michele Catellani; Letizia M I Janello; Lorenzo Bianchi; Giacomo Novara; Fabrizio Dal Moro; Riccardo Schiavina; Elisa De Lorenzis; Paolo Parma; Sebastiano Cimino; Ottavio De Cobelli; Francesco Maiorino; Pierluigi Bove; Fabio Crocerossa; Francesco Cantiello; David D'Andrea; Federica Di Cosmo; Francesco Porpiglia; Pasquale Ditonno; Emanuele Montanari; Francesco Soria; Paolo Gontero; Giovanni Liguori; Carlo Trombetta; Guglielmo Mantica; Marco Borghesi; Carlo Terrone; Francesco Del Giudice; Alessandro Sciarra; Andrea Galosi; Marco Moschini; Shahrokh F Shariat; Marta Di Nicola; Andrea Minervini; Matteo Ferro; Maria Angela Cerruto; Luigi Schips; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Alessandro Antonelli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Pentafecta for Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Proposal for Standardization of Quality Care Metrics.

Authors:  Frederik König; Nico C Grossmann; Francesco Soria; David D'Andrea; Tristan Juvet; Aaron Potretzke; Hooman Djaladat; Alireza Ghoreifi; Eiji Kikuchi; Nozomi Hayakawa; Andrea Mari; Zine-Eddine Khene; Kazutoshi Fujita; Jay D Raman; Alberto Breda; Matteo Fontana; John P Sfakianos; John L Pfail; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Pawel Rajwa; Maximilian Pallauf; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Thomas van Doeveren; Joost L Boormans; Alessandro Antonelli; Marcus Jamil; Firas Abdollah; Jeffrey Budzyn; Guillaume Ploussard; Axel Heidenreich; Siamak Daneshmand; Stephen A Boorjian; Morgan Rouprêt; Michael Rink; Shahrokh F Shariat; Benjamin Pradere
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.