| Literature DB >> 32944534 |
Hao Cheng1,2, Zichang Niu3, Fengyue Xin1, Lin Yang4, Litao Ruan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An important indicator of penile erectile function is erection hardness (EH), which is currently evaluated by the semi-quantitative erectile hardness score (EHS). EH increases continuously during the course of an erection, so although it is statistically a continuous variable, the EHS is a grade variable. We propose a new method for real-time quantitative measurement of penile EH using ultrasonic shear wave elastography (SWE).Entities:
Keywords: Corpus cavernosum; erectile dysfunction (ED); erection hardness; tunica albuginea; ultrasound shear wave elastography (ultrasound SWE)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32944534 PMCID: PMC7475665 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Androl Urol ISSN: 2223-4683
Tissue stiffness values (Young’s modulus, YM) of the left and right corpus cavernosum and tunica albuginea at different degrees of erectile hardness
| Erectile hardness | YM of corpus cavernosum (kPa) | YM of tunica albuginea (kPa) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left | Right | P value | Left | Right | P value | ||
| Resting [60] | 11.16±3.16 | 11.05±2.97 | 0.961 | 21.66±4.21 | 21.97±4.51 | 0.988 | |
| Grade 1 [16] | 10.22±2.23 | 10.17±1.98 | 1.000 | 32.61±4.27 | 32.79±4.71 | 0.901 | |
| Grade 2 [43] | 9.28±1.21 | 9.23±1.76 | 0.955 | 54.86±8.69 | 54.98±9.09 | 0.972 | |
| Grade 3 [45] | 9.26±1.71 | 9.21±1.68 | 0.911 | 128.02±20.66 | 128.81±19.12 | 0.998 | |
| Grade 4 [37] | 9.28±1.57 | 9.26±1.39 | 0.968 | 223.23±23.61 | 223.99±26.73 | 0.990 | |
Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). *, some erectile dysfunction (ED) patients were unable to achieve EH grade 2, 3, or 4, and some normal controls achieved erection very quickly after drug injection; therefore, the number of cases varies for the different erection hardness (EH) grades.
Figure 1Real-time shear wave elastography of corpus cavernosum and albuginea tissues for different penile erection grades. (A) Up: Cavernosum at Resting state hardness (mean YM =11.3 kPa); Down: Albuginea at Resting state hardness (mean YM =12.1 kPa). (B) Up: Cavernosum at Grade 1 hardness (mean YM =8.8 kPa); Down: Albuginea at Grade 1 hardness (mean YM =27.6 kPa); (C) Up: Cavernosum at Grade 2 hardness (mean YM =6.1 kPa); Down: Albuginea at Grade 2 hardness (mean YM =47.1 kPa); (D) Up: Cavernosum at Grade 3 hardness (mean YM =6.3 kPa); Down: Albuginea at Grade 3 hardness (mean YM =142.2 kPa); (E) Up: Cavernosum at Grade 4 hardness (mean YM =11.3 kPa); Down: Albuginea at Grade 4 hardness (mean YM =235.2 kPa). YM, Young’s modulus.
Tissue stiffness values (Young’s modulus, YM) of the left corpus cavernosum and tunica albuginea in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) and normal controls (NCs) at different degrees of erectile hardness
| Erectile hardness | YM of corpus cavernosum (kPa) | YM of tunica albuginea (kPa) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ED | NC | P value | ED | NC | P value | ||
| Resting | 12.90±2.06 | 9.82±1.92 | 0.042 | 21.68±4.19 | 21.59±4.68 | 0.989 | |
| Grade 1 | 10.97±2.26 | 9.32±1.90 | 0.568 | 32.59±4.19 | 32.71±3.72 | 0.904 | |
| Grade 2 | 9.25±1.23 | 9.16±1.71 | 0.955 | 54.16±8.51 | 54.12±10.06 | 0.974 | |
| Grade 3 | 9.38±1.61 | 9.18±1.68 | 0.911 | 127.82±20.36 | 127.81±18.10 | 0.997 | |
| Grade 4 | 9.38±1.47 | 9.26±1.34 | 0.968 | 223.93±23.61 | 223.39±26.82 | 0.989 | |
Results are mean ± standard deviation (SD). There were no significant differences between the ED patients and NCs under SWE measurement except that the YM of the corpus cavernosum was lower in the NCs than in ED patients.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristics curve of Young’s modulus of penile albuginea and corpus cavernosum on the left side.
Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) between corpus cavernosum and tunica albuginea for penile erection hardness.
| AUC | Standard error | 95% credibility interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus cavernosum | 0.7012 | 0.0382 | 0.6263 | 0.7761 |
| Tunica albuginea | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
χ2 test =61.10, P<0.0001.