| Literature DB >> 32944351 |
Zifeng Yang1, Jie Wu2, Feng Ye1, Bing Zhu3, Wenda Guan1, Jicheng Huang4, Zhou Songyang5, Yong Liu6, Yi Chen3, Qiuling Du1,7, Jingxian Chen6, Yu Zhang8, Changwen Ke2, Yongping Lin1, Baoqing Sun1, Jun Zeng7, Ling Chen1, Jiankang Ren6, Xiwen Jiang9, Minfei Yu10, Biao Di11, Nanshan Zhong1, Lei Zheng12.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32944351 PMCID: PMC7475603 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-1928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895
Figure 1Suitable tests and specimens during the course of COVID-19.
Comparison of common nucleic acid testing techniques for SARS-CoV-2
| Variable | Fluorescent RT-PCR | Multiplex fluorescence PCR | Digital PCR | Isothermal amplification | High-flux sequencing (take the following two techniques as examples) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) | Nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) | ||||||
| Sensitivity | Moderately high | Middle | High | Moderately high | Moderately high | High | |
| Time needed | 4–6 hours | 4–6 hours | 8–10 hours | 1.5–2 hours | 24–36 hours | 6–10 hours | |
| Test scope | Single pathogen | Simultaneously detect multiple pathogens | Single pathogen | Simultaneously detect multiple pathogens | Screen for genetic information of all microorganisms (including those unknown) in samples at one time | Simultaneously detect multiple pathogens | |
| Operating process | General | General | Complicated | Simple | Complicated | Complicated | |
| Cost | General | Low | High | Low | Moderately high | High | |
| Report method | Qualitative | Qualitative | Absolute quantification | Qualitative | Qualitative | Qualitative | |
| Clinical application | Quickly screen and confirm infected patients | Distinguish between COVID-19 pathogen and viruses of common respiratory infection | Quantify the level of nucleic acids and provide a basis for judging the | Quickly confirm infected cases and accurately rule out | Analyze species composition structure, functional activity, etc.; analyze species transcriptomes and genomes deeply, microscopically, and panoramically | Detect SARS-CoV-2 and its genetic mutations; monitor the changes in toxicity and transmission ability caused by virus mutations | |
Interpretation of nucleic acid testing results for SARS-CoV-2
| First test result | Procedures | Re-test result | Judgment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both ORF1ab and N positive | No | No | Positive |
| Either ORF1ab or N positive | (I) re-sample and re-test | Either ORF1ab or N positive | Positive |
| (II) If re-sampling is difficult, re-extract the nucleic acid from the original sample and test it simultaneously with two kits from different manufacturers | A target shows positive results by two kits | Positive | |
| A target shows negative results by two kits | Negative | ||
| A target shows a positive result by only one kit | Suspected to be positive Recommended to re-sample and re-test | ||
| “Grey interval” results: (I) Ct values of both targets in the “gray interval”; (II) Ct values of one target in the “gray interval” | Re-extract the nucleic acid and test it simultaneously with two kits from different manufacturers | Both reagents positive | Positive |
| Both reagents negative | Negative | ||
| Only one reagent positive | Suspected to be positive Recommended to re-sample and re-test |
Comparison of common methods for serological testing of SARS-CoV-2
| Variable | Colloidal gold immunochromat-ography | Fluorescence immunochromato-graphy | ELISA | Chemiluminescence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Low | Middle | Middle | High |
| Time needed | 10–20 minutes | 10–20 minutes | 2–3 hours | 0.5–1 hour |
| Flux | Low | Low | High | High |
| Procedures | Simple | Simple | Complicated | Moderately simple |
| Instruments | None | Small instruments | Microplate reader and plate washer | Chemiluminescence Apparatus |
| Judging method | Human eyes | Instruments | Instruments | Instruments |
| Report method | Qualitative/semi-quantitative | Quantitative | Qualitative/ Quantitative | Quantitative |
Interpretation of test results for specific antibodies IgM and IgG of SARS-CoV-2
| Number | Nucleic acid | IgM | IgG | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | + | − | − | The patient may be in a “window period”, which usually lasts one to two weeks |
| 2 | + | + | − | The patient may be in an early period of infection |
| 3 | + | − | + | The patient may be in a middle or late period of infection or have a recurrent infection |
| 4 | + | + | + | The patient is in an active period of infection, but the body has developed a certain immunity to SARS-CoV-2 |
| 5 | − | + | + | The result is a false negative. The patient is in an active period of infection, or the patient has recently been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and is still in a recovery period, so the virus has been cleared from the body, but IgM has not been reduced to the lower limit of testing |
| 6 | − | + | − | The patient is suspected of acute infection and may be in an early period of the disease, and IgG has not yet been produced. There may also be false positives for IgM due to positive rheumatoid factor |
| 7 | − | ± | − | The patient is in an early stage of the initial infection, and the virus loading amount is extremely low and below the testing limit of nucleic acid. The body produces a small amount of IgM, but it has not yet produced IgG. Alternatively, the false positive for IgM is due to the patient’s own rheumatoid factor |
| 8 | − | − | + | The patient had a past infection or the IgG result is false positive. The patient may have been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, so the patient is in a recovery period or the virus is cleared from the body. IgG produced in an immune response lasts for a long time and is still present in the blood to be detected |
Judgment of the results of cytopathic effects (CPE)
| Cytopathic ratio | Result |
|---|---|
| 0 | – |
| 25% | + |
| 50% | ++ |
| 75% | +++ |
| 100% | ++++ |
| Non-specific toxicity | D |
| Bacterial or mold contamination | C |
Figure 2Electron micrographs of ultrathin sections of virus-positive Vero-E6 cells isolated from SARS-CoV-2 pharyngeal swab samples (provided by Zifeng Yang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University). (A) A large number of viral granules can be seen in the cytosol, outside the membrane, and between the protrusions, and virions (bar =200 nm, 50,000×) are also attached to the inner wall of the vesicle; (B) a large number of virions adhere inside and outside of the cytosol and between the protrusions (bar =500 nm, 30,000×).
Figure 3Electron micrographs of ultra-thin sections of alveolar lavage fluid from SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (provided by Zifeng Yang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University). The figure shows that there are obvious lamellar bodies in the cells, which can be judged as type II alveolar epithelial cells. A large number of vesicles in the cells are enriched with numerous viral granules (bar =200 nm, 50,000×).
Figure 4Packaging of class A infectious substances.