| Literature DB >> 32943986 |
Jigui Peng1,2,3, Hao Xu2,3,4, Jianchun Cai1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To establish a primary human gastric cancer cell line.Entities:
Keywords: Cell line; Primary culture; Stomach neoplasm; XGC-1
Year: 2020 PMID: 32943986 PMCID: PMC7487967 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01536-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Results of STR analysis
| Microsatellite (chromosome) | XGC-1 (P90) | Tumor tissue |
|---|---|---|
| Amelogenin | X, Y | X, Y |
| TH01 | 9 | 9 |
| D21S11 | 29 | 29 |
| D5S818 | 10,13 | 10,13 |
| D13S317 | 9,11 | 9,11 |
| D7S820 | 11 | 11 |
| D16S539 | 11,12 | 11,12 |
| CSF1PO | 11,13 | 11,13 |
| vWA | 16,17 | 16,17 |
| TPOX | 8 | 8 |
P indicates the passage number of a cell line
Fig. 1Morphology of XGC-1 cells. a Micrographs of XGC-1 cells at different passages under phase contrast (A1: passage 1; A2: passage 10; A3: passage 20; A4: passage 30; A5: passage 40; A6: passage 50. Magnification, ×200). b When nutrients are insufficient, the cells will fall off the plate into the culture medium (magnification, ×200). c H&E staining showed large nuclei and prominent nucleoli (magnification, ×200). d Ultrastructural appearance of XGC-1 cells (magnification, ×8000). e The growth curve of XGC-1 cells
Fig. 2The anchorage-independent growth capability of XGC-1 cells in vitro. XGC-1 cells were plated in 0.3% agar supplemented with 10% FBS for 2 weeks to test the formation of colonies. a Colony formation for 1 week. b Colony formation for 2 weeks
Fig. 3Karyotype analysis of the XGC-1 cell line. The karyotype of the XGC-1 cell line shows abnormalities in both the number and structure of chromosomes
Fig. 4Tumourigenicity of XGC-1 cells in nude mice. a BALB/C nude mice were injected subcutaneously with 1 × 106 cells for 4 weeks, the mice were sacrificed, and the tumours were excised for histopathological examination. b The solid tumour was obtained. c Histology of primary tumours formed by XGC-1 cells showed poorly differentiated gastric cancer, and the structure of the gland was seen (magnification, ×100) (H&E). d Histology of xenografted tumours of XGC-1 cells showed poorly differentiated gastric cancer, and the structure of the gland was observed (magnification, ×100) (H&E)
Fig. 5Immunohistochemistry of XGC-1 cells (magnification, ×200). a PBS was used as a negative control. b XGC-1 cells exhibited positive results for cytokeratin. c The cells were negative for vimentin. d Ki-67 was expressed at very high levels in the nucleus (≥ 75%). e Carcinoembryonic antigen was positive in XGC-1 cells. f Cancer antigen 19-9 was negtive