| Literature DB >> 32943834 |
Farhad Nejat1, Khosrow Jadidi1, Shiva Pirhadi1,2, Seyede-Yasamin Adnani1, Nazanin-Sadat Nabavi1, Mohammad Amin Nejat1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Introducing a new technique to remove the conjunctival cyst using atmospheric low-temperature plasma (ALTP) and assessing its effectiveness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five eyes with conjunctival cysts were included in this study. The procedure was started by applying a plasma spot on the highest point of the cyst, and then other spots were spirally applied to the base of the cyst to debulk it. The conjunctival cysts were removed using the white handpiece of the plasma generator device (Plexr, GMV s.r.l Grottaferrata, Italy). Refraction, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), contrast sensitivity (CS), aberrometry, dry eye tests, and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire were measured before, one and six months after treatment.Entities:
Keywords: atmospheric low-temperature plasma; conjunctival cyst; ocular surface disorder; soft surgery; sublimation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32943834 PMCID: PMC7468540 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S265032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Figure 1Steps of the PANIS method to remove the conjunctival cyst. (A) Place the patient behind the slit lamp and use the white handpiece of Plexr device (B) The cyst of patient No. 5 (C) Apply the first spot to drain the fluid of the cyst (D) Apply consecutive spots at the edge of the cyst (E) Continue the spots and reach the initial spot (F) Apply some spots to the base of the cyst to prevent recurrence and around the cyst to fuse conjunctival tissue to the underlying layers (G) End of the surgery and complete removal of the cyst.
Patients Characteristics and Parameters Measured in Different Examinations
| Case 1: Female (51-Year-Old), Cyst Site: Inferior Temporal Forniceal, Cyst Size: 3.6 X 1.8 Mm | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preop. | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 16 | 5 | 0.2 | I | 4 | 8.33 | 1.64 | 0.894 |
| 1 month postop. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 3 | 0.15 | 0 | 3 | 8.33 | 1.68 | 0.551 |
| 6 months postop. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 0.15 | 0 | 4 | 8.33 | 1.56 | 0.513 |
| Preop. | 0.8 | 0 | −1 | 90 | 0.9 | 12 | 12 | 0.2 | II | 8 | 8.33 | 1.36 | 0.638 |
| 1 month postop. | 0.7 | 0.5 | −1.5 | 90 | 0.8 | 16 | 8 | 0.3 | 0 | 5 | 6.25 | 1.4 | 0.488 |
| 6 months postop. | 0.8 | 0 | −1 | 90 | 0.9 | 12 | 18 | 0.2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 1.36 | 0.3 |
| Preop. | 0.7 | −0.75 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 22 | 0.2 | 0 | 6 | 7.5 | 1.76 | 0.836 |
| 1 month postop. | 0.9 | −0.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 18 | 0.2 | 0 | 6 | 7.5 | 1.76 | 0.486 |
| 6 months postop. | 0.9 | −0.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 20 | 0.2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1.76 | 0.766 |
| Preop. | CF | 10 | −8 | 80 | 0.1 | 5 | 10 | 0.2 | III | 6 | 14.58 | 0.24 | 3.974 |
| 1 month postop. | CF | 10 | −8 | 80 | 0.05 | 4 | 12 | 0.2 | II | 5 | 0 | 0.24 | 7.266 |
| 6 months postop. | CF | 5 | −7 | 60 | CF | 6 | 10 | 0.2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0.48 | 6.815 |
| Preop. | 0.6 | 0 | −1 | 160 | 0.6 | 17 | 5 | 0.2 | I | 9 | 22.72 | 1.44 | 0.275 |
| 1 month postop. | 0.6 | 0 | −0.5 | 115 | 0.6 | 16 | 5 | 0.2 | 0 | 8 | 2.7 | 1.44 | 0.399 |
| 6 months postop. | 0.6 | −0.25 | −0.25 | 130 | 0.6 | 11 | 5 | 0.2 | 0 | 8 | 2.7 | 1.44 | 0.455 |
Notes: †An Oxford grading scheme was used to determine the corneal staining, which shows the severity of dry eye. This grading has six different degrees including 0, I, II, III, IV, and V, which are described as absent, minimal, mild, moderate, marked and severe, respectively.28 *The OSDI questionnaire consists of 12 questions. The answer to each question is graded on a scale of 0 to 4, which 0 corresponds to “none of the time” and 4 corresponds to “all of the time”. This score, which is a number between 0 and 100, is calculated using this formula: OSDI score= [(sum of scores for all questions answered) x 100]/[(total number of questions answered) x 4]. A score between 0 and 12 indicates normal, 13 to 22 indicates mild dry eye, 23 to 32 indicates moderate dry eye, and more than 33 indicates severe dry eye.29
Figure 2Patient slit lamp images (A) before (B) six months after treatment.
Various Methods for Removing Conjunctival Cysts
| Author (s) (Year) | Methods | Office-Based | Type of Anesthesia | Eyes (n) | Cyst Size (mm) | Follow-Up Time | Complications | Eyes with Recurrence (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bustros and Michels | Nd: YAG laser | Yes | Topical | 1 | N/M | 3 | No | 0 |
| Hawkins and Hammin | Thermal cautery | Yes | Local | 3 | Small | 1–2 | No | 0 |
| Yien et al (2009) | Use of sodium hyaluronate and indocyanine green for conjunctival cyst excision | N/M | N/M | 1 | 4.5 | N/M | N/M | N/M |
| Kothari (2009) | Isopropyl alcohol with paired injection technique | Yes | Topical | 2 | Small | 9 | Patient burning sensation during exam. | 0 |
| Han et al (2012) | Argon laser photoablation | N/M | Topical | 1 | 3 | 6 | No | 0 |
| Eom et al (2014) | Sutureless small-incision conjunctival cystectomy | N/M | Topical then local | 4 | N/M | 2–6 | N/M | 0 |
| Park et al (2015) | High-frequency radio-wave electrosurgery | N/M | Topical | 21 | N/M | 6–14 | Mild foreign body sensation for two days in two patients | 0 |
| Yang et al (2017) | Pattern scan laser photocoagulation (PASCAL) | N/M | Topical | 1 | 3.5 | 6 | Minimal amount of subconjunctival hemorrhage | 0 |
| El-Abedin Rajab and Demer (2019) | Surgical excision of conjunctival retention cyst using trypan blue with methylcellulose | No | 2 Local | 3 | N/M | 24 | N/M | 1 |
| Han et al (2020) | Modified argon laser photoablation | Yes | Topical | 17 | 4.8 | 6–28 | Hemorrhage in one patient during surgery, two eyes developed mild conjunctival swelling and foreign body sensation post-operative | 3 |
Abbreviations: Cyst size, mean of horizontal and vertical diameters; N/M, not mentioned.