Literature DB >> 32943772

Investigating an in silico approach for prioritizing antidepressant drug prescription based on drug-induced expression profiles and predicted gene expression.

Edoardo Giacopuzzi1,2, Oliver Pain3, Chiara Fabbri3, Muhammad Shoaib4,3, Chiara Magri4, Alessandra Minelli4, Cathryn M Lewis5,6, Massimo Gennarelli4,2.   

Abstract

In clinical practice, an antidepressant prescription is a trial and error approach, which is time consuming and discomforting for patients. This study investigated an in silico approach for ranking antidepressants based on their hypothetical likelihood of efficacy. We predicted the transcriptomic profile of citalopram remitters by performing an in silico transcriptomic-wide association study on STAR*D GWAS data (N = 1163). The transcriptional profile of remitters was compared with 21 antidepressant-induced gene expression profiles in five human cell lines available in the connectivity-map database. Spearman correlation, Pearson correlation, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test were used to determine the similarity between antidepressant-induced profiles and remitter profiles, subsequently calculating the average rank of antidepressants across the three methods and a p value for each rank by using a permutation procedure. The drugs with the top ranks were those having a high positive correlation with the expression profiles of remitters and that may have higher chances of efficacy in the tested patients. In MCF7 (breast cancer cell line), escitalopram had the highest average rank, with an average rank higher than expected by chance (p = 0.0014). In A375 (human melanoma) and PC3 (prostate cancer) cell lines, escitalopram and citalopram emerged as the second-highest ranked antidepressants, respectively (p = 0.0310 and 0.0276, respectively). In HA1E (kidney) and HT29 (colon cancer) cell types, citalopram and escitalopram did not fall among top antidepressants. The correlation between citalopram remitters' and (es)citalopram-induced expression profiles in three cell lines suggests that our approach may be useful and with future improvements, it can be applicable at the individual level to tailor treatment prescription.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32943772     DOI: 10.1038/s41397-020-00186-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J        ISSN: 1470-269X            Impact factor:   3.550


  2 in total

1.  Predictors of remission in the treatment of major depressive disorder: real-world evidence from a 6-month prospective observational study.

Authors:  Diego Novick; Jihyung Hong; William Montgomery; Héctor Dueñas; Magdy Gado; Josep Maria Haro
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.570

2.  RICOPILI: Rapid Imputation for COnsortias PIpeLIne.

Authors:  Max Lam; Swapnil Awasthi; Hunna J Watson; Jackie Goldstein; Georgia Panagiotaropoulou; Vassily Trubetskoy; Robert Karlsson; Oleksander Frei; Chun-Chieh Fan; Ward De Witte; Nina R Mota; Niamh Mullins; Kim Brügger; S Hong Lee; Naomi R Wray; Nora Skarabis; Hailiang Huang; Benjamin Neale; Mark J Daly; Manuel Mattheisen; Raymond Walters; Stephan Ripke
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.