Literature DB >> 32943469

The impact of routine Edmonton symptom assessment system use on receiving palliative care services: results of a population-based retrospective-matched cohort analysis.

Lisa Barbera1,2,3,4, Rinku Sutradhar3,4, Craig C Earle3,4, Doris Howell4,5, Nicole Mittman6, Qing Li3, Deva Thiruchelvam3, Hsien Seow3,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2007, Cancer Care Ontario began standardised symptom assessment as part of routine care using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of ESAS on receipt of palliative care when compared with a matched group of unexposed patients.
DESIGN: A retrospective-matched cohort study examined the impact of ESAS screening on initiation of palliative care services provided by physicians or homecare nurses. The study included adult patients diagnosed with cancer between 2007 and 2015. Exposure was defined as completing ≥1 ESAS during the study period. Using 4 hard and 14 propensity score-matched variables, patients with cancer exposed to ESAS were matched 1:1 to those who were not. Matched patients were followed from first ESAS until initiation of palliative care, death or end of study.
RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 204 688 matched patients with no prior palliative care consult. The pairs were well matched. The cumulative incidence of receiving palliative care within the first 5 years was higher among those exposed to ESAS compared with those who were not (27.9% (95% CI: 27.5% to 28.2%) versus 27.9% (95% CI: 27.5% to 28.2%)), when death is considered as a competing event. In the adjusted cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model, ESAS assessment was associated with a 6% increase in palliative care services (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.08).
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that patients exposed to ESAS were more likely to receive palliative care services compared with patients who were not exposed. This observation provides real-world data of the impact of routine assessment with a patient-reported outcome. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; clinical assessment; supportive care; symptoms and symptom management

Year:  2020        PMID: 32943469     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   3.568


  4 in total

1.  Factors associated with worsening sexual function during adjuvant endocrine therapy in a prospective clinic-based cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Neha Verma; Amanda L Blackford; Elissa Thorner; Jennifer Lehman; Claire Snyder; Vered Stearns; Karen Lisa Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 2.  Striving to Fill in Gaps between Clinical Practice and Standards: The Evolution of a Pan-Canadian Approach to Patient-Reported Outcomes Use.

Authors:  Amanda Caissie; Robert Olson; Lisa Barbera; Jennifer O'Donnell; Carol-Anne Davis; Jennifer Croke; Louise Bird; John Kildea; Erika Brown; Michael Brundage; Michael Milosevic
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Cinzia Brunelli; Emanuela Zito; Sara Alfieri; Claudia Borreani; Anna Roli; Augusto Caraceni; Giovanni Apolone
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The impact of routine Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) use on overall survival in cancer patients: Results of a population-based retrospective matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Barbera; Rinku Sutradhar; Hsien Seow; Nicole Mittmann; Doris Howell; Craig C Earle; Qing Li; Deva Thiruchelvam
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.