| Literature DB >> 32943095 |
Philip S J Weston1, Teresa Poole2,3, Jennifer M Nicholas2,3, Nicolas Toussaint2,4, Ivor J A Simpson2,4, Marc Modat2,5, Natalie S Ryan2, Yuying Liang2, Martin N Rossor2, Jonathan M Schott2, Sebastien Ourselin2,5, Hui Zhang6, Nick C Fox2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in improving understanding of the timing and nature of early neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and developing methods to measure this in vivo. Autosomal dominant familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD) provides the opportunity for investigation of presymptomatic change. We assessed early microstructural breakdown of cortical grey matter in FAD with diffusion-weighted MRI.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Autosomal dominant; Cerebral cortex; Diffusion; Familial; MRI; Mean diffusivity; Presymptomatic
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32943095 PMCID: PMC7499910 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-020-00679-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Impact factor: 6.982
Fig. 1Cortical parcellation and measurement of cortical MD. Each T1 image (a) underwent cortical parcellation using FreeSurfer (v5.30) (b). The FreeSurfer label for each ROI was warped into diffusion space (c) and registered to the MD map (d) to allow extraction of mean MD within that region (e)
Participant demographics
| Controls | Early presymptomatic | Late presymptomatic | Symptomatic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | 10 | 11 | 17 | |
| Age, years (mean (SD)) | 44.6 (9.5) | 34.8 (5.5)* | 41.9 (8.4) | 47.6 (9.0) |
| Gender, m/f | 15/24 | 3/7 | 5/6 | 10/7 |
| EYO, years (mean (SD)) | – | − 11.8 (2.6) | − 3.3 (4.6) | 4.8 (4.0)^ |
| Global CDR (mean (SD)) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.85 (0.39)** |
For comparison of age, unadjusted linear regression was used; for comparison of CDR, Fisher’s exact test was used
EYO estimated years to onset, CDR Clinical Dementia Rating scale
*Evidence of a difference (p < 0.05) compared with controls
**Evidence of a difference (p < 0.001) compared with controls
^2 missing values
Fig. 2Box plots of cortical MD in the six regions of interest across the different disease stages. EPS, early presymptomatic; LPS, late presymptomatic
MD values
| Controls | Early presymptomatic | Late presymptomatic | Symptomatic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entorhinal cortex MD (SD) | 7.43 (0.52) | 7.73 (0.46) | 7.50 (0.64) | 8.49 (1.03)** |
| Inferior parietal cortex MD (SD) | 7.89 (0.24) | 7.93 (0.36) | 8.19 (0.26)* | 9.26 (0.55)** |
| Precuneus MD (SD) | 8.18 (0.28) | 8.07 (0.33) | 8.43 (0.42)* | 9.50 (0.62)** |
| Superior frontal cortex MD (SD) | 7.98 (0.28) | 7.84 (0.22) | 7.99 (0.37) | 8.89 (0.57)** |
| Superior parietal cortex MD (SD) | 8.34 (0.35) | 8.32 (0.35) | 8.52 (0.36) | 9.58 (0.66)** |
| Supramarginal cortex MD (SD) | 8.04 (0.36) | 7.95 (0.36) | 8.15 (0.31) | 9.24 (0.62)** |
Observed mean (SD) MD values (mm2/s × 10−3) are shown for each cortical ROI across the four groups. For comparison of MD, linear regression was used, adjusted for age and sex
MD mean diffusivity
*Evidence of a difference (p < 0.05) compared with controls
**Evidence of a difference (p < 0.001) compared with controls
Association between MD and EYO in presymptomatic mutation carriers
| Region | Correlation with EYO (Spearman’s rho) | |
|---|---|---|
| Entorhinal cortex | − 0.43 | 0.05 |
| Inferior parietal cortex | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| Precuneus | 0.46 | 0.04 |
| Superior frontal cortex | 0.40 | 0.07 |
| Superior parietal cortex | 0.32 | 0.16 |
| Supramarginal cortex | 0.11 | 0.63 |
Spearman correlation coefficients and p values for the association between MD and EYO in presymptomatic mutation carriers only, in each of the six cortical regions of interest
EYO estimated years to onset
Fig. 3Association between cortical mean diffusivity and cortical thickness. Scatter plots are shown, with accompanying Spearman correlation coefficients, for the association between mean diffusivity and cortical thickness across mutation carriers. Black dots represent symptomatic carriers and white dots presymptomatic carriers
Fig. 4Relationship between mean diffusivity and estimated years to/from symptom onset in mutation carriers. Graphs show linear regression of MD against EYO after adjusting for cortical thickness and including a quadratic term for EYO in all models for consistency. For each region, cortical thickness was set at the mean value for the study sample for that region: entorhinal (2.75 mm), inferior parietal (2.20 mm), precuneus (2.14 mm), superior frontal (2.32 mm), superior parietal (1.91 mm) and supramarginal (2.30 mm). The p value is from a test of the association between MD and EYO after adjusting for cortical thickness. MD, mean diffusivity; EYO, estimated years to/from symptom onset