| Literature DB >> 32943010 |
Arthur Jacob1, Jennifer Pasquier2,3,4, Raphael Carapito5, Frédéric Auradé6, Anne Molitor5, Philippe Froguel1,7, Khalid Fakhro8,9, Najeeb Halabi10, Géraldine Viot11, Seiamak Bahram5, Arash Rafii12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mandibulofacial dysostosis with microcephaly (MFDM) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disease characterized by intellectual and growth retardations, as well as major microcephaly, induced by missense and splice site variants or microdeletions in the EFTUD2 gene. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Case report; EFTUD2; Exonic splice enhancer variant; Mandibulofacial dysostosis with microcephaly; Synonymous splice variant; Whole-exome sequencing; de novo
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32943010 PMCID: PMC7499997 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-01121-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Fig. 1Identification of the de novo variant in the patient. a The graphs present the Whole Exome Sequencing pile-up reads of the region of interest. The red lines highlight the identified de novo NM_004247.4 c.702G > T variant in EFTUD2 gene in the patient (Top graph) compared to its parent. b Electropherograms from Sanger sequencing of a nucleotide change from G to T in the proband (Daughter) compared to her parents. This variant is a heterozygous variant as both alleles harbor a different nucleotide. c Schematic view of EFTUD2 protein structure, with the location of c.702G > T, p.Gly234Gly and of some other variants of different types causing MFDM disease. The synonymous variant identified in our patient is in red, missense mutations are shown in blue, truncating (nonsense and frameshift) mutations are shown in black, and the intron splice donor mutation is shown in green
Detailed clinical features of our patient compared to the spectrum of clinical symptoms observed in patients with MFDM
| Features | Our patient | All reported individuals | Estimated penetrance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micrognathia | Yes | 87/89 | 98 |
| Small or dysplastic pinna(e) | Yes | 84/87 | 97 |
| Malar hypoplasia | Yes | 78/84 | 93 |
| Hearing loss | Yes | 69/83 | 83 |
| Conductive | No | 32/51 | 63 |
| Mixed | No | 13/51 | 25 |
| Sensorineural | Yes | 7/51 | 12 |
| Auditory atresia /stenosis | No | 47/73 | 64 |
| Vestibular system abnormalities | No | 14/25 | 56 |
| Ossicular abnormalities | No | 8/15 | 53 |
| Facial asymmetry | No | 25/47 | 53 |
| Preauricular tag(s) | No | 45/86 | 52 |
| Cleft palate | No | 41/88 | 47 |
| Choanal atresia | No | 27/83 | 33 |
| Neonatal resuscitation | No | 14/46 | 30 |
| Tracheostomy | No | 10/50 | 20 |
| Limitation of mouth opening | Yes | 7/85 | 8 |
| Thumb anomalies | No | 24/77 | 31 |
| Heart defects | No | 28/89 | 31 |
| Esophageal atresia | No | 23/85 | 27 |
| Renal malformation | No | 9/85 | 10 |
| Developmental delay | Yes | 83/83 | 100 |
| Microcephaly | Yes | 78/89 | 88 |
| Congenital | No | 34/53 | 64 |
| Postnatal | Yes | 19/53 | 36 |
| Epileptic seizures | Yes | 21/77 | 27 |
Fig. 2In silico predictions of the impact of NM_004247.4 (EFTUD2): c.702G > T variant on splicing. a Screenshot of in silico predictions of the impact of EFTUD2 c.702G > T variant using Alamut software. Three out of five tools predicted that the G > T variant creates a new 5′ donor splicing site (red circle) in the mutated sequence (bottom rectangle) compared to wildtype sequence (top rectangle). The exon 9 (red) and intron 9 (blue) are highlighted on the Figure. b The table represents the splicing scores for the new 5′ donor splicing site by the five predicators tools. The threshold score to reach predicting the presence of a donor splice site is indicated for each predicator tool
Fig. 3NM_004247.4 (EFTUD2): c.702G > T variant induces exon skipping. a Electrophoresis gel of EFTUD2 cDNA obtained after amplification of the variant region from the proband and its parents. The proband displays two bands, one at 360 bp and one at 280 bp. b Electropherogram from Sanger sequencing 360 bp and 280 bp bands from the electrophoresis gel in A. The exon 8 is highlighted in red, the exon 9 in green and the exon 10 in blue. The exon 9 – exon 10 junction of EFTUD2 cDNA shows exon 9 skipping in cDNA of 280 bp band which is presented only in the proband. c Schematic representation of the exon 9 skipping in the mutant allele of the proband compared to the wild type (WT) allele