| Literature DB >> 32942639 |
Tatiana Yakhno1, Alexander Pakhomov1, Anatoly Sanin1, Vyacheslav Kazakov1, Ruben Ginoyan2, Vladimir Yakhno1,3.
Abstract
It is known that the processes of self-organization of the components of drying a liquid drop on a solid substrate are well reproduced under the same external conditions and are determined only by the composition and dispersion of the liquid. If the drop dries on the surface of the sensor device, these processes can be recorded and used as a passport characteristic of the liquid. The first half of the article is devoted to the description of the principles of the method and the proof of the validity of our assumptions. The second half of the article is devoted to the development of a user-friendly version of the device, where the change in the real and imaginary parts of the electrical impedance of the resonator was used as an informative parameter. The measure of the closeness of the relative positions of the hodographs of the compared samples on the complex plane is used as a criterion for the similarity-/-difference of various liquids. The design of a new sensor device and the results of its tests for distinguishing between different brands of alcoholic beverages and reconstituted milk of different concentrations are presented.Entities:
Keywords: comparative analysis; drying drops; recognition statistics; sensor device; signal processing
Year: 2020 PMID: 32942639 PMCID: PMC7571074 DOI: 10.3390/s20185266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Change in the amplitude (1) and phase (2) of acoustomechanical impedance (AMI) during drying of a drop of tested fluids on the sensor surface.
Figure 2Calculation of SI-1: finding reference points and determining design parameters characterizing the shape of the amplitude curve of a drying drop. SI-1 is the total derivative on the section of the curve marked in black.
Figure 3(a) Photo of a modified version of the device, overall dimensions: 200 × 140 × 50 mm, weight 200 g. (b) Sensor module detached from the device body: 1—quartz resonator and 2—USB-connector. (c) Diagram of the device of the sensor module: 1—printed circuit board, 2—plastic parts, 3—quartz plate with metallization, 4—conductive rubber, 5—metallization layer, and 6—drop.
Figure 4Functional diagram of the device: 1—drop; 2—sensor; 3—generator; 4—bridge circuit; 5—compensating capacitor; 6—reference resistor; 7—unbalance voltage amplifier; 8—phase detectors; 9—integrators; 10—analog-to-digital converter; and 11—computer.
Figure 5An example of calculating the difference index (DI) of two hodographs as the average distance between the points of the corresponding samples: n is the starting point of reference; k is the end point of reference.
Figure 6Software interface. (a) Hodographs of electrical impedance: sample 1—port wine “777” (Russia) and sample 2—vermouth “Martini Bianko” (Italy). (b) Intermediate data for calculating proximity measures between sample 1 and sample 2: green shows the distance between hodographs for sample 1; blue shows distances between hodographs for sample 1 and hodographs for sample 2. Ordinate - axis is the number of measurements for given DI values. The abscissa is the DI values. (c) Joint distribution of the estimates for errors of the second kind (green) and errors of the first kind (blue) versus DI value with the calculation of sensitivity and specificity [32].
List of the samples under study.
| Hard Drinks | Wine | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Georgian brandy Eristavi 5* | 1. | Semi-sweet red table wine Toro de Oro (Spain) |
| 2. | Georgian brandy Eristavi 3* | 2. | Port wine 777 (Russia) |
| 3. | Russian brandy Staraya Krepost | 3. | Vermouth Martini Bianco (Italy) |
| 4. | Russian brandy Lezginka | 4. | Semi-sweet grape natural red wine Khvanchkara (Georgia) |
| 5. | Russian drink Three old men | 5. | Dry white table wine Chardonnay (Fanagoria, Russia) |
| 6. | Irish whiskey Jameson | 6. | Dry white table wine Sauvignon (Fanagoria, Russia) |
| 7. | Macallan Whiskey (Scotland) | 7. | Dry white table wine Aligote-Riesling of Fanagoria (Fanagoria, Russia) |
| 8. | Mordovian balm (Russia) | 8. | Semi-dry red wine Pirosmani (Georgia) |
| 9. | Brandy Stareishina (Russia) | 9. | Semi-dry red wine Pirosmani (Georgia) + sugar (3 g/100 mL) |
| 10. | Vodka Khlebnaya Sleza (Russia) | 10. | Semi-dry red wine Pirosmani (Georgia) + sugar (6 g/100 mL) |
| 11. | Semi-dry red wine Pirosmani (Georgia) + sugar (9 g/100 mL) | ||
| Milk | |||
| 1. | Whole powdered milk, 6 g/100 mL distilled water | 3. | Whole powdered milk, 10 g/100 mL distilled water |
| 2. | Whole powdered milk, 8 g/100 mL distilled water | 4. | Whole powdered milk, 14 g/100 mL distilled water |
Figure 7Software interface (a,b). A variety of shapes of hodographs of liquids of different classes: 1—dry red wine; 2—cognac; 3—whiskey; 4—balm; and 5—vodka.
The obtained differences between the compared samples.
| Compared Samples | Recognition Statistics (EER—Equal Error Rate) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hard drinks | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
| 1. | Georgian brandy Eristavi 5* and Georgian brandy Eristavi 3* | 93 | 99 |
| 2. | Georgian brandy Eristavi 5* and Russian brandy Staraya Krepost | 97 | 100 |
| 3. | Georgian brandy Eristavi 3* and Russian brandy Staraya Krepost | 20 | 99 |
| 4. | Russian brandy Lezginka and Russian drink Three old men | 100 | 100 |
| 5. | Russian brandy Lezginka and Irish whiskey Jameson | 100 | 100 |
| 6. | Macallan Whiskey (Scotland) and Mordovian balm (Russia) | 100 | 100 |
| 7. | Vodka Khlebnaya Sleza (Russia) and Brandy Stareishina (Russia) | 100 | 100 |
| Wine | |||
| 8. | Semi-sweet red table wine Toro de Oro (Spain) and Port wine 777 (Russia) | 100 | 100 |
| 9. | Port wine 777 (Russia) and Vermouth Martini Bianco (Italy) | 100 | 100 |
| 10. | Semi-sweet red table wine Toro de Oro (Spain) and | 100 | 100 |
| 11. | Dry white table wine Chardonnay (Fanagoria, Russia) and | 100 | 100 |
| 12. | Dry white table wine Sauvignon (Fanagoria, Russia) and | 100 | 100 |
| 13. | Semi-dry red wine Pirosmani (Georgia) and | 100 | 100 |
| 14. | Semi-dry red wine Pirosmani (Georgia) + sugar (3 g/100 mL) and | 100 | 100 |
| 15. | Semi-dry red wine Pirosmani (Georgia) + sugar (6 g/100 mL) and | 100 | 100 |
| Milk | |||
| 16. | Whole powdered milk, 6 g/100 mL distilled water and | 99 | 85 |
| 17. | Whole powdered milk, 6 g/100 mL distilled water and | 100 | 100 |
| 18. | Whole powdered milk, 10 g/100 mL distilled water and | 100 | 100 |
Figure 8Scheme of incorporating the proposed method into the procedure of assessing the compliance of a liquid with its standard.