| Literature DB >> 32942574 |
Qingrui Zeng1, Suyue Guo1, Yuanbo Sun2, Zhuojuan Li1, Wei Feng1.
Abstract
A phosphomolybdic acid/Entities:
Keywords: nanocomposite thin film; phosphomolybdic acid (PMoA); photochromism; polyaniline (PANI); protonation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32942574 PMCID: PMC7559633 DOI: 10.3390/nano10091839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1The protonation process to fabricate a PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film.
Figure 2(a) FTIR spectrogram of PMoA, PANI, and the PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film before and after optical-light illumination. (b) FTIR spectrogram in the PANI region of PANI and PMoA/PANI before and after optical-light illumination. (c) FTIR spectrogram in the PMoA region of PMoA and the PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film before and after optical-light illumination. (d) Chemical structures of PANI and the PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film before and after optical-light illumination.
Figure 3(a1,a2) AFM 2D and 3D image of PANI, (b1,b2) AFM 2D and 3D image of the PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film before optical-light illumination, (c1,c2) AFM 2D and 3D image of the PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film after optical-light illumination.
Figure 4(a) XPS photoelectron spectrograms of PANI and PMoA/PANI hybrid thin films before illumination. (b) XPS photoelectron spectrogram and Gaussian deconvolution curve fitting for C 1s. (c) XPS photoelectron spectrogram and Gaussian deconvolution curve fitting for N 1s.
Comparison of C– and N-related functional groups of pure PANI and the. PMoA/PANI hybrid film before irradiation.
|
|
| |||||
| Tested element | C | N | ||||
| Functional group | C–H | C=N | C–N+ | –N= | –NH– | –NH+– |
| Binding Energy (eV) | 284.5 | 285.7 | - | 397.7 | 399.0 | - |
| Contribution | 70.80% | 29.20% | - | 27.89% | 72.11% | - |
|
|
| |||||
| Tested element | C | N | ||||
| Functional group | C–H | C=N | C–N+ | –N= | –NH– | –NH+– |
| Binding Energy (eV) | 284.5 | 285.4 | 285.9 | 397.25 | 398.70 | 401.5 |
| Contribution | 53.36% | 22.75% | 23.89% | 18.21% | 64.75% | 17.04% |
Figure 5(a) UV-Vis spectrogram of the coloration process of the PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film for different coloration time. (b) Kinetic plot of the first-order photochromic process in the PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film. (c) UV-Vis spectrogram of the decoloration process of the PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film for different decoloration approach. (d) The reversibility of the coloration cycle of the PMoA/PANI hybridizing thin film in H2O2.
Comparison of the maximum absorbance of photochromic materials.
| Photochromic Material | Maximum Light Absorbance | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Fe(III) R-PLG23 metal complex | 0.12 | [ |
| PMoA/TiO2 | 0.13 | [ |
| PMoA/Na-MMT/PVPd | 0.19 | [ |
| PMoA/PVPd | 0.225 | [ |
| CP/TiO2 | 0.25 | [ |
| (NH4)14[NaP5W30O110] | 0.28 | [ |
| Gold Nanoparticle-Molybdenum Trioxide Thin Films | 0.75 | [ |
| CsPbBr3 Quantum Dot Films | 0.78 | [ |
| MoO3 Nanoribbons | 0.8 | [ |
| Two Tri-Lacunary α-Dawson-Type Polyoxotungstates | 1.25 | [ |
| Non-Stoichiometric Monoclinic Structured Tungsten Trioxide (WO3− | 1.27 | [ |
| Spiropyran-Containing Fluorinated Polyacrylate Hydrophobic Coatings | 1.5 | [ |
| PEG-400 assisted WO3–TiO2–ZnO films | 1.6 | [ |
| WO3−x QDs | 2.8 | [ |
| Rhodamine Joined with Polyurethane | 3.2 | [ |
| Aromatic Sulfonium Octamolybdates | 3.35 | [ |
| PMoA/PANI Hybridizing Thin Film | 3.46 |
|
Figure 6(a) XPS survey spectrogram of the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film before and after optical-light illumination. (b) XPS survey spectrogram and Gaussian deconvolution curve fitting for Mo 3d in the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film. (c) XPS survey spectrogram and Gaussian deconvolution curve fitting for C 1s in the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film. (d) XPS survey spectrogram and Gaussian deconvolution curve fitting for N 1s in the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film.
The change in the valence state of Mo in the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film.
| Sample | Mo5+ | Mo6+ | Mo5+/Mo | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3d3/2 | 3d5/2 | 3d3/2 | 3d5/2 | ||
| Before | 231.85 | 235.50 | 233.05 | 236.20 | 0.07 |
| After | 231.65 | 234.80 | 232.90 | 236.0 | 0.36 |
Comparison of C– and N–-containing functional groups of PMoA/PANI hybrid thin films before and after optical-light illumination.
|
|
| |||||
| Tested element | C | N | ||||
| Functional group | C–H | C=N | C–N+ | –N= | –NH– | –NH+– |
| Binding Energy (eV) | 284.5 | 285.4 | 285.9 | 397.2 | 398.2 | 401.5 |
| Contribution | 53.36% | 22.75% | 23.89% | 18.21% | 64.75% | 17.04% |
|
|
| |||||
| Tested element | C | N | ||||
| Functional group | C–H | C=N | C–N+ | –N= | –NH– | –NH+– |
| Binding Energy (eV) | 284.5 | 285.4 | 285.9 | 397.80 | 398.70 | 401.5 |
| Contribution | 53.36% | 32.44% | 14.20% | 31.89% | 58.30% | 9.81% |
Figure 7Electrochemistry study of EIS of PANI and the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film (a) EIS of PANI and the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film. (b) Mott-Schottky curve of PANI and the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film.
Figure 8(a) DFT calculations of the FMOs of the eigenstate PANI unit. (b) DFT calculations of the FMOs of the unipolar PANI unit.
Figure 9(a) The protonation process of PANI. (b1) Process of coloration of the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film. (b2) Process of decoloration of the PMoA/PANI hybrid thin film in air. (c) Schematic diagram of LMCT.