Gareth Richards1, Simon Baron-Cohen2, Tommy van Steen3, John Galvin4. 1. School of Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, UK; Autism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: gareth.richards@ncl.ac.uk. 2. Autism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK. 3. Institute of Security and Global Affairs, Universiteit Leiden, Netherlands. 4. Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that the ratio of length between the second and fourth fingers (2D:4D), commonly employed as an indicator of foetal sex hormone exposure, may be positively correlated between heterosexual partners. AIMS: As previous evidence has been conflicting, our study aimed to determine whether intra-couple correlations exist for digit ratio variables, and if so, to estimate the size and direction of these effects. STUDY DESIGN: We present a preregistered (osf.io/6jg8p) correlational study and quantitative meta-analysis of the available literature, and attempted to locate further published and unpublished data (i.e. 'grey literature') by contacting n = 248 researchers in the 2D:4D and related fields. SUBJECTS: n = 58 heterosexual dating couples from the UK took part in our empirical study, and the meta-analysis included data from k = 11 samples. OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured digit ratio for the right hand (R2D:4D), left hand (L2D:4D), and average of both hands (M2D:4D), as well as the right-left-difference (D[R-L]). RESULTS: We found no evidence of significant positive intra-couple correlations in our own data, but a significant (positive) meta-analytic effect size estimate emerged for R2D:4D (r = 0.072, p = 0.014). The meta-analytic effects for L2D:4D (r = 0.043, p = 0.303), M2D:4D (r = 0.070, p = 0.225), and D[R-L] (r = 0.028, p = 0.649) were all in the same direction but not statistically significant. However, if the sample from Klimek et al. (2014, 2016) were omitted, meta-analysis would also yield a significant positive correlation for M2D:4D (r = 0.128, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although our findings are based on a fairly small range of studies, which themselves provide a relatively small sample of participants, they do imply the intriguing possibility of small effects of positive assortment in relation to characteristics associated with the prenatal hormonal environment.
BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesised that the ratio of length between the second and fourth fingers (2D:4D), commonly employed as an indicator of foetal sex hormone exposure, may be positively correlated between heterosexual partners. AIMS: As previous evidence has been conflicting, our study aimed to determine whether intra-couple correlations exist for digit ratio variables, and if so, to estimate the size and direction of these effects. STUDY DESIGN: We present a preregistered (osf.io/6jg8p) correlational study and quantitative meta-analysis of the available literature, and attempted to locate further published and unpublished data (i.e. 'grey literature') by contacting n = 248 researchers in the 2D:4D and related fields. SUBJECTS: n = 58 heterosexual dating couples from the UK took part in our empirical study, and the meta-analysis included data from k = 11 samples. OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured digit ratio for the right hand (R2D:4D), left hand (L2D:4D), and average of both hands (M2D:4D), as well as the right-left-difference (D[R-L]). RESULTS: We found no evidence of significant positive intra-couple correlations in our own data, but a significant (positive) meta-analytic effect size estimate emerged for R2D:4D (r = 0.072, p = 0.014). The meta-analytic effects for L2D:4D (r = 0.043, p = 0.303), M2D:4D (r = 0.070, p = 0.225), and D[R-L] (r = 0.028, p = 0.649) were all in the same direction but not statistically significant. However, if the sample from Klimek et al. (2014, 2016) were omitted, meta-analysis would also yield a significant positive correlation for M2D:4D (r = 0.128, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although our findings are based on a fairly small range of studies, which themselves provide a relatively small sample of participants, they do imply the intriguing possibility of small effects of positive assortment in relation to characteristics associated with the prenatal hormonal environment.