Rationale: Pneumococcal colonization is key to the pathogenesis of invasive disease but is also immunogenic in young adults, protecting against recolonization. Colonization is rarely detected in older adults, despite high rates of pneumococcal disease. Objectives: To establish experimental human pneumococcal colonization in healthy adults aged 50-84 years, to measure the immune response to pneumococcal challenge, and to assess the protective effect of prior colonization against autologous strain rechallenge. Methods: Sixty-four participants were inoculated with Streptococcus pneumoniae (serotype 6B; 80,000 cfu in each nostril). Colonization was determined by bacterial culture of nasal wash, and humoral immune responses were assessed by anticapsular and antiprotein IgG concentrations.Measurements and Main Results: Experimental colonization was established in 39% of participants (25/64) with no adverse events. Colonization occurred in 47% (9/19) of participants aged 50-59 compared with 21% (3/14) in those aged ≥70 years. Previous pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination did not protect against colonization. Colonization did not confer serotype-specific immune boosting, with a geometric mean titer (95% confidence interval) of 2.7 μg/ml (1.9-3.8) before the challenge versus 3.0 (1.9-4.7) 4 weeks after colonization (P = 0.53). Furthermore, pneumococcal challenge without colonization led to a drop in specific antibody concentrations from 2.8 μg/ml (2.0-3.9) to 2.2 μg/ml (1.6-3.0) after the challenge (P = 0.006). Antiprotein antibody concentrations increased after successful colonization. Rechallenge with the same strain after a median of 8.5 months (interquartile range, 6.7-10.1) led to recolonization in 5/16 (31%).Conclusions: In older adults, experimental pneumococcal colonization is feasible and safe but demonstrates different immunological outcomes compared with younger adults in previous studies.
Rationale: Pneumococcal colonization is key to the pathogenesis of invasive disease but is also immunogenic in young adults, protecting against recolonization. Colonization is rarely detected in older adults, despite high rates of pneumococcal disease. Objectives: To establish experimental humanpneumococcal colonization in healthy adults aged 50-84 years, to measure the immune response to pneumococcal challenge, and to assess the protective effect of prior colonization against autologous strain rechallenge. Methods: Sixty-four participants were inoculated with Streptococcus pneumoniae (serotype 6B; 80,000 cfu in each nostril). Colonization was determined by bacterial culture of nasal wash, and humoral immune responses were assessed by anticapsular and antiprotein IgG concentrations.Measurements and Main Results: Experimental colonization was established in 39% of participants (25/64) with no adverse events. Colonization occurred in 47% (9/19) of participants aged 50-59 compared with 21% (3/14) in those aged ≥70 years. Previous pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination did not protect against colonization. Colonization did not confer serotype-specific immune boosting, with a geometric mean titer (95% confidence interval) of 2.7 μg/ml (1.9-3.8) before the challenge versus 3.0 (1.9-4.7) 4 weeks after colonization (P = 0.53). Furthermore, pneumococcal challenge without colonization led to a drop in specific antibody concentrations from 2.8 μg/ml (2.0-3.9) to 2.2 μg/ml (1.6-3.0) after the challenge (P = 0.006). Antiprotein antibody concentrations increased after successful colonization. Rechallenge with the same strain after a median of 8.5 months (interquartile range, 6.7-10.1) led to recolonization in 5/16 (31%).Conclusions: In older adults, experimental pneumococcal colonization is feasible and safe but demonstrates different immunological outcomes compared with younger adults in previous studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Streptococcus pneumoniae; ; elderly; human challenge models; immunity; vaccination
Authors: Merijn W Bijlsma; Matthijs C Brouwer; E Soemirien Kasanmoentalib; Anne T Kloek; Marjolein J Lucas; Michael W Tanck; Arie van der Ende; Diederik van de Beek Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Seema Jain; Wesley H Self; Richard G Wunderink; Sherene Fakhran; Robert Balk; Anna M Bramley; Carrie Reed; Carlos G Grijalva; Evan J Anderson; D Mark Courtney; James D Chappell; Chao Qi; Eric M Hart; Frank Carroll; Christopher Trabue; Helen K Donnelly; Derek J Williams; Yuwei Zhu; Sandra R Arnold; Krow Ampofo; Grant W Waterer; Min Levine; Stephen Lindstrom; Jonas M Winchell; Jacqueline M Katz; Dean Erdman; Eileen Schneider; Lauri A Hicks; Jonathan A McCullers; Andrew T Pavia; Kathryn M Edwards; Lyn Finelli Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David Goldblatt; Mahein Hussain; Nick Andrews; Lindsey Ashton; Camilla Virta; Alessia Melegaro; Richard Pebody; Robert George; Anu Soininen; John Edmunds; Nigel Gay; Helena Kayhty; Elizabeth Miller Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Marc J M Bonten; Susanne M Huijts; Marieke Bolkenbaas; Chris Webber; Scott Patterson; Samantha Gault; Cornelis H van Werkhoven; Anna M M van Deursen; Elisabeth A M Sanders; Theo J M Verheij; Michael Patton; Anne McDonough; Anita Moradoghli-Haftvani; Helen Smith; Tracey Mellelieu; Michael W Pride; Graham Crowther; Beate Schmoele-Thoma; Daniel A Scott; Kathrin U Jansen; Rita Lobatto; Bas Oosterman; Nils Visser; Esther Caspers; Andre Smorenburg; Emilio A Emini; William C Gruber; Diederick E Grobbee Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Shamez N Ladhani; Sarah Collins; Abdelmajid Djennad; Carmen L Sheppard; Ray Borrow; Norman K Fry; Nicholas J Andrews; Elizabeth Miller; Mary E Ramsay Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Catherine G Sutcliffe; Lindsay R Grant; Emily Cloessner; Keith P Klugman; Jorge E Vidal; Raymond Reid; Janene Colelay; Robert C Weatherholtz; Sopio Chochua; Michael R Jacobs; Mathuram Santosham; Katherine L O'Brien; Laura L Hammitt Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-12-31 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Elizabeth A Clutterbuck; Rajeka Lazarus; Ly-Mee Yu; Jaclyn Bowman; Elizabeth A L Bateman; Linda Diggle; Brian Angus; Tim E Peto; Peter C Beverley; David Mant; Andrew J Pollard Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Cassandra L Krone; Anne L Wyllie; Josine van Beek; Nynke Y Rots; Anna E Oja; Mei Ling J N Chu; Jacob P Bruin; Debby Bogaert; Elisabeth A M Sanders; Krzysztof Trzciński Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Konstantinos Liatsikos; Angela Hyder-Wright; Sherin Pojar; Tao Chen; Duolao Wang; Kelly Davies; Christopher Myerscough; Jesus Reine; Ryan E Robinson; Britta Urban; Elena Mitsi; Carla Solorzano; Stephen B Gordon; Angela Quinn; Kaijie Pan; Annaliesa S Anderson; Christian Theilacker; Elizabeth Begier; Bradford D Gessner; Andrea Collins; Daniela M Ferreira Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Caroline M Weight; Simon P Jochems; Hugh Adler; Daniela M Ferreira; Jeremy S Brown; Robert S Heyderman Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Elissavet Nikolaou; Esther L German; Annie Blizard; Ashleigh Howard; Lisa Hitchins; Tao Chen; Jim Chadwick; Sherin Pojar; Elena Mitsi; Carla Solórzano; Syba Sunny; Felicity Dunne; Jenna F Gritzfeld; Hugh Adler; Jason Hinds; Katherine A Gould; Jamie Rylance; Andrea M Collins; Stephen B Gordon; Daniela M Ferreira Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 4.379