Literature DB >> 32941600

Using informatics to improve cancer surveillance.

Wendy Blumenthal1, Temitope O Alimi1, Sandra F Jones1, David E Jones1, Joseph D Rogers1, Vicki B Benard1, Lisa C Richardson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This review summarizes past and current informatics activities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries to inform readers about efforts to improve, standardize, and automate reporting to public health cancer registries. TARGET AUDIENCE: The target audience includes cancer registry experts, informaticians, public health professionals, database specialists, computer scientists, programmers, and system developers who are interested in methods to improve public health surveillance through informatics approaches. SCOPE: This review provides background on central cancer registries and describes the efforts to standardize and automate reporting to these registries. Specific topics include standardized data exchange activities for physician and pathology reporting, software tools for cancer reporting, development of a natural language processing tool for processing unstructured clinical text, and future directions of cancer surveillance informatics. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association 2020. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer surveillance; electronic health records; interoperability; laboratory information systems; natural language processing; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32941600      PMCID: PMC7647312          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  23 in total

1.  2015 Edition Health Information Technology (Health IT) Certification Criteria, 2015 Edition Base Electronic Health Record (EHR) Definition, and ONC Health IT Certification Program Modifications. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2015-10-16

2.  Enhancing central cancer registry treatment data using physician medical claims: a Florida pilot project.

Authors:  Monique N Hernandez; Jill A MacKinnon; Lynne Penberthy; Judy Bonner; Youjie X Huang
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2014

3.  A comparison of the completeness and timeliness of automated electronic laboratory reporting and spontaneous reporting of notifiable conditions.

Authors:  J Marc Overhage; Shaun Grannis; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Improvements in timeliness resulting from implementation of electronic laboratory reporting and an electronic disease surveillance system.

Authors:  Erika Samoff; Mary T Fangman; Aaron T Fleischauer; Anna E Waller; Pia D M Macdonald
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Completeness and timeliness of electronic vs. conventional laboratory reporting for communicable disease surveillance--Oklahoma, 2011.

Authors:  Matthew G Johnson; Jean Williams; Anthony Lee; Kristy K Bradley
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Real-time surveillance for tuberculosis using electronic health record data from an ambulatory practice in eastern Massachusetts.

Authors:  Michael S Calderwood; Richard Platt; Xuanlin Hou; Jessica Malenfant; Gillian Haney; Benjamin Kruskal; Ross Lazarus; Michael Klompas
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Impact of automated data collection from urology offices: improving incidence and treatment reporting in urologic cancers.

Authors:  Lynne T Penberthy; Donna McClish; Pamela Agovino
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2010

8.  Underreporting of myeloid malignancies by United States cancer registries.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Dana E Rollison; Alan F List; Christopher R Cogle
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Melanoma underreporting: why does it happen, how big is the problem, and how do we fix it?

Authors:  Myles Cockburn; Susan M Swetter; David Peng; Theresa H M Keegan; Dennis Deapen; Christina A Clarke
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Automated identification of acute hepatitis B using electronic medical record data to facilitate public health surveillance.

Authors:  Michael Klompas; Gillian Haney; Daniel Church; Ross Lazarus; Xuanlin Hou; Richard Platt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Electronic Data Reporting and Outcomes Among Selected Central Cancer Registries of the National Program of Cancer Registries.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Patrick Edwards; Paran Pordell; Reda Wilson; Wendy Blumenthal; Sandy F Jones; Madeleine Jones; Jenny Beizer; Amarilys Bernacet; Maggie Cole-Beebe; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-08

Review 2.  The use of electronic health records to inform cancer surveillance efforts: a scoping review and test of indicators for public health surveillance of cancer prevention and control.

Authors:  Sarah Conderino; Stefanie Bendik; Thomas B Richards; Claudia Pulgarin; Pui Ying Chan; Julie Townsend; Sungwoo Lim; Timothy R Roberts; Lorna E Thorpe
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  A Case Study of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Using Electronic Health Records to Support Public Health Surveillance on an Emerging Cancer Control Topic.

Authors:  Julie S Townsend; Mary Catherine Jones; Mildred N Jones; Amy W Waits; Kamilah Konrad; Natasha M McCoy
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2021
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.