| Literature DB >> 32941517 |
Alexandra Braun1, Dimitar Evdokimov1, Johanna Frank1, Claudia Sommer1, Nurcan Üçeyler1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MicroRNA (miRNA) mainly inhibit post-transcriptional gene expression of specific targets and may modulate disease severity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32941517 PMCID: PMC7498021 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic characteristics and questionnaire data.
| Maladaptive cluster | Adaptive cluster | Vulnerable cluster | Resilient cluster | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | |
| 52.4 | 53.7 | 47.2 | 49.4 | |
| 47 ± 0.52 | 28 ± 0.21 | 42 ± 0.34 | 48 ± 0.18 | |
| 50.1 ± 9.8 | 35.8 ± 3.4 | 54.9 ± 9.4 | 48.9 ± 5.6 | |
| 2 ± 2 | 2 ± 2 | 2 ± 2 | 2 ± 0 | |
| 21.1 ± 8.9 | 13.0 ± 7.4 | 30.2 ± 8.3 | 17.1 ± 3.5 | |
| 21.9 ± 6.8 | 8.5 ± 6.8 | 29.6 ± 6.0 | 10.2 ± 3.2 | |
| 47.0 ± 8.6 | 39.5 ± 7.3 | 63.6 ± 7.3 | 38.7 ± 9.7 | |
| 47.1 ± 8.2 | 43.3 ± 7.5 | 62.2 ± 8.3 | 37.8 ± 7.7 | |
| 10.3 ± 5.4 | 7.3 ± 1.3 | 12.4 ± 6.0 | 8.33 ± 2.7 | |
| 7 ± 17 | 5.5 ± 4 | 7 ± 11 | 5.7 ± 8 | |
| 9.7 ± 7.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 6.2 ± 2.7 | 5.7 ± 1.0 | |
| 13.6 ± 3.3 | 10.5 ± 4.2 | 16.0 ± 4.1 | 14.2 ± 3.2 | |
| 7.4 ± 2.1 | 6.5 ± 2.4 | 8.8 ± 4.3 | 8.5 ± 1.8 | |
| 0 ± 1 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
*not normally distributed data, MED (= median) ± R (= range); a CTQ-D questionnaire was added during the study and represents data of 22 patients.
Based on data obtained in our previous study [12], a cluster classification is included in Table 1 reflecting cluster-specific differences.
Fig 1Relative gene expression of four selected miRNA in WBC samples of FMS patients and healthy controls.
Boxplots show ΔCT values of miR103a-3p, miR107, miR125a-5p, and miR130a-3p of patients with FMS and healthy controls normalized to the housekeeping gene 5sRNA. Data are presented as 1/ΔCT. Intergroup differences were seen for miR103a-3p, miR107, miR125a-5p and miR130a-3p (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: C = controls; CT = cycle threshold; FMS = patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.
Effect sizes underline the large differences in miR103a-3p between unfavorable and favorable cluster.
| d | r | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 3.6 | 0.9 | large |
| AC | 2.9 | 0.8 | large |
| DA | -3.0 | -0.8 | large |
| BD | 3.6 | 0.9 | large |
| DC | -0.3 | -0.2 | small |
| A | -1.2 | 0.5 | medium |
| miR103a-3p | -2.8 | -0.8 | large |
| miR107 | -0.8 | -0.4 | small |
| miR125a-5p | 1.0 | 0.5 | medium |
| miR130a-3p | -1.6 | -0.6 | medium |
*Capitals symbolizing cluster A (maladaptive), B (adaptive), C (vulnerable), and cluster D (resilient) and the calculated effect size r and Cohen’s d between them
**Evaluation of effect size regarding following grades: 0.2 = small, 0.5 = medium, 0.8 = large
Calculated with effect size calculator of the University of Colorado, https://lbecker.uccs.edu/
Fig 2Relative gene expression of four selected miRNA in WBC samples of FMS patients illustrated regarding their cluster division in maladaptive, adaptive, vulnerable, and resilient cluster.
Data are presented as 1/ΔCT. Differences among cluster are detected for miR103a-3p (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: C = controls.
Correlation between relative gene expression of miRNA and clinical scores within the patient cohort (N = 22).
| miR | Clinical score | r |
|---|---|---|
| miR103a-3p | FIQ | -0.4 |
| miR107 | CTQ physical abuse | -0.5 |
| miR125a-5p | PCS | 0.4 |
*Spearman coefficient r
**Significance level p < 0.05
Gene expression of miR125a-5p was associated with the sum score of the PCS questionnaire (r = 0.4, p < 0.05).
Fig 3Synopsis of a speculative regulatory process of adaptive behavior in a cluster of FMS patients.
Upregulated miRNA expression of miR103a-3p might be responsible for a regulatory cascade of SNRK and NF-κB signalling leading to adaptation on FMS symptoms in a subgroup of FMS patients. Based on the fact of forming a miRNA–family with miR103a-3p and the slight increased gene expression in our adaptive FMS cluster, the speculative potential signalling cascade of miR107 is included and marked as only based on literature data and a trend in our data. Abbreviations: ↑ symbolizes upregulation, ↓ symbolizes downregulation; + symbolizes the positive and resilience / adaptation promoting effect; CDK = cyclin dependent kinases; IL6 = interleukin 6; IL-1β = interleukin 1beta; NF-κB = nuclear-factor kappa B subunit protein 65; SNRK = sucrose non-fermentable serine/threonine-protein kinase; TLR4 = toll-like receptor 4; TNF = tumor necrosis factor-alpha.”