Literature DB >> 3294080

Effect of gastric bubble as a weight reduction device: a controlled, crossover study.

H Meshkinpour1, D Hsu, S Farivar.   

Abstract

In spite of the widespread use of the Garren-Edwards gastric bubble as an adjuvant device in weight reduction, its efficacy has not been established. Therefore, our purpose was to conduct a randomized, double-blind, crossover study of this device in the management of exogenous obesity. The study group consisted of 23 patients, 21 women and 2 men, ranging in age from 21 to 53 yr. Patients were 25%-111% above their ideal body weight. They were studied for 24 wk, consisting of two separate 12-wk evaluation periods. Patients were randomly assigned either to receive the gastric bubble or to have a sham procedure. After the first 12-wk evaluation period, the gastric bubble and sham were administered in crossover fashion, so that those who had received the gastric bubble initially received the sham later and vice versa. The study coordinator remained blind to the kind of treatment, weighed each patient biweekly, enforced dietary counseling, and provided behavior modification. Those who had passed or were found to have a deflated bubble at the end of the treatment period were excluded from the study. Mean weight reduction in the two evaluation periods did not differ significantly. Patients lost 5.4 +/- 1.7 kg (mean +/- SE) during the gastric bubble period and 5.20 +/- 0.8 kg during the sham period. The order of administration of the gastric bubble and sham did not significantly affect the result. The time-course of mean biweekly values, however, revealed that with the gastric bubble, weight loss was significantly greater only during first (p less than 0.005) and second (p less than 0.025) 2-wk evaluation periods. This difference, however, disappeared after the initial 4 wk of treatment. These observations suggest that although gastric bubble implantation reduced weight significantly more than the sham procedure initially, the mean weight loss during 12 wk of evaluation was not different between the two periods. In our opinion, the gastric bubble is of no value as an adjuvant device in weight reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3294080     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(88)80002-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  28 in total

1.  Effects of posture on gastric emptying, transpyloric flow, and hunger after a glucose drink in healthy humans.

Authors:  Karen L Jones; Deirdre O'Donovan; Michael Horowitz; Antonietta Russo; Yong Lei; Trygve Hausken
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Functional neuroimaging of gastric distention.

Authors:  Elke Stephan; José V Pardo; Patricia L Faris; Boyd K Hartman; Suck W Kim; Emil H Ivanov; Randy S Daughters; Patricia A Costello; Robert L Goodale
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Standardization of Bariatric Metabolic Procedures: World Consensus Meeting Statement.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; M A L Fobi; Jane N Buchwald
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Air-filled vs water-filled intragastric balloon: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Cristiano Giardiello; Alessandro Borrelli; Eufemia Silvestri; Valentina Antognozzi; Giuseppe Iodice; Michele Lorenzo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Percutaneous deflation of a gastric balloon: technical note.

Authors:  D R Mirich; R R Gray; G B Haber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  A review of unmet needs in obesity management.

Authors:  N Nguyen; J K Champion; J Ponce; B Quebbemann; E Patterson; B Pham; W Raum; J N Buchwald; G Segato; F Favretti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Diffusion of robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology across specialties: a national study from 2008 to 2013.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Aditya Mantha; Ahmad Abiri; Anne Lin; Erik Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Endoscopic treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Agnieszka Swidnicka-Siergiejko; Eugeniusz Wróblewski; Dabrowski Andrzej
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 9.  Safety and effectiveness of the intragastric balloon for obesity. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Iñaki Imaz; Carmen Martínez-Cervell; Elvira Elena García-Alvarez; Juan Manuel Sendra-Gutiérrez; Jesús González-Enríquez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Efficacy of First-Time Intragastric Balloon in Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Alan A Saber; Saeed Shoar; Mahmoud W Almadani; Natan Zundel; Mohammed J Alkuwari; Moataz M Bashah; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.