Literature DB >> 32940740

Pathologic spinopelvic balance in patients with hip osteoarthritis : Preoperative screening and therapeutic implications.

Moritz M Innmann1, Johannes Weishorn1, Paul E Beaule2, George Grammatopoulos2, Christian Merle3.   

Abstract

Recently spinopelvic balance and mobility, i.e. the dynamic interaction of the spine, pelvis and the femur in the sagittal plane between different postures, has been identified as a relevant factor influencing the outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Individual spinopelvic balance and mobility seem to affect patient reported outcome and the risk of impingement and dislocation following THA. The aim of this article is to provide a concise overview of normal and pathologic spinopelvic alignment, to characterize relevant spinopelvic parameters and the diagnostic assessment in patients with hip OA and to discuss potential implications for THA with respect to implant selection and component orientation.Spinopelvic characteristics are highly variable. Patients with stiff lumbar spines and mobile hips seem to be at an increased risk of impingement and dislocation and can be screened with single lateral standing radiographs of the spinopelvic complex before THA. In patients with hip and spine pathology, particular attention should be paid to evaluate the individual pathoanatomy of the hip and established clinical measurements should be diligently taken with respect to the reconstruction of the center of rotation, hip offset, leg length and soft tissue tension in order to minimize the risk of impingement and dislocation. No evidence-based recommendations for novel target zones concerning implant position can currently be made. In patients at risk 36 mm heads should be used whenever possible. In high risk patients, such as the combination of a stiff unbalanced lumbar spine ("flatback") and a mobile hip or in the presence of long spinal fusions or fusions involving the sacrum, dual mobility cups offer additional stability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impingement; Patient reported outcome; Radiography; Reconstruction; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32940740     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-020-03981-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  4 in total

Review 1.  [What are the benefits of patient-specific reconstruction in total hip replacement?]

Authors:  Christian Merle; Moritz M Innmann; Fabian Westhauser; Patrick Sadoghi; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty: how to get it right without navigation or robotics.

Authors:  Geert Meermans; George Grammatopoulos; Moritz Innmann; David Beverland
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  EFFECTS OF HIP FLEXION CONTRACTURE ON SAGITTAL SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS.

Authors:  Rômulo Pedroza Pinheiro; Matheus Pippa Defino; Flávio Luis Garcia
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 0.683

4.  SPINOPELVIC MOBILITY IN PATIENTS WITH HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS AND TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY INDICATION.

Authors:  Flavio Luis Garcia; Guilherme Pianowski Pajanoti; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 0.683

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.