Literature DB >> 32940683

The Prepare for Kidney Care Study: prepare for renal dialysis versus responsive management in advanced chronic kidney disease.

Emma Murphy1, Aine Burns2, Fliss E M Murtagh3, Leila Rooshenas4, Fergus J Caskey4.   

Abstract

Shared decision making in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires unbiased information on survival and person-centred outcomes known to matter to patients: quality of life, symptom burden and support from family and healthcare professionals. To date, when deciding between dialysis and conservative care, patients have had to rely on evidence from small observational studies. Clinicians recognize that like is not being compared with like in these studies, and interpret the results differently. Furthermore, support differs considerably between renal units. What patients choose therefore depends on which renal unit they attend. To address this, a programme of work has been underway in the UK. After reports on survival and symptoms from a small number of renal units, a national, mixed-methods study-the Conservative Kidney Management Assessment of Practice Patterns Study-mapped out conservative care practices and attitudes in the UK. This led to the Prepare for Kidney Care study, a randomized controlled trial comparing preparation for dialysis versus preparation for conservative care. Although powered to detect a positivist 0.345 difference in quality-adjusted life years between the two treatments, this trial also takes a realist approach with a range of person-centred secondary outcomes and embedded qualitative research. To understand generalizability, it is nested in an observational cohort study, which is nested in a CKD registry. Challenges to recruitment and retention have been rapidly identified and addressed using an established embedded mixed methods approach-the QuinteT recruitment intervention. This review considers the background to and progress with recruitment to the trial.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative effectiveness; conservative care; dialysis; randomized controlled trial

Year:  2021        PMID: 32940683     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  4 in total

1.  Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Nicola Farrar; Daisy Elliott; Catherine Houghton; Marcus Jepson; Nicola Mills; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Lucy Plumb; Julia Wade; Bridget Young; Jenny L Donovan; Leila Rooshenas
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.728

2.  Timing of dialysis initiation to reduce mortality and cardiovascular events in advanced chronic kidney disease: nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Edouard L Fu; Marie Evans; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Hein Putter; Catherine M Clase; Fergus J Caskey; Maciej Szymczak; Claudia Torino; Nicholas C Chesnaye; Kitty J Jager; Christoph Wanner; Friedo W Dekker; Merel van Diepen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-11-29

Review 3.  Survival of Older Patients With Advanced CKD Managed Without Dialysis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Angela Chou; Kelly Chenlei Li; Mark Ashley Brown
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2022-03-12

4.  Survival of patients who opt for dialysis versus conservative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carlijn G N Voorend; Mathijs van Oevelen; Wouter R Verberne; Iris D van den Wittenboer; Olaf M Dekkers; Friedo Dekker; Alferso C Abrahams; Marjolijn van Buren; Simon P Mooijaart; Willem Jan W Bos
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 7.186

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.