Armando Peña1,2, Daniel McNeish3, Stephanie L Ayers4, Micah L Olson1,5, Kiley B Vander Wyst1, Allison N Williams1, Gabriel Q Shaibi1,2,5. 1. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. 2. College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA. 4. Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. 5. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the heterogeneity in response to lifestyle intervention among Latino adolescents with obesity. METHODS: We conducted secondary data analysis of 90 Latino adolescents (age 15.4 ± 0.9 y, female 56.7%) with obesity (BMI% 98.1 ± 1.5%) that were enrolled in a 3 month lifestyle intervention and were followed for a year. Covariance pattern mixture models identified response phenotypes defined by changes in insulin sensitivity as measured using a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test. Baseline characteristics were compared across response phenotypes using one-way ANOVA and chi-square test. RESULTS: Three distinct response phenotypes (PH1, PH2, PH3) were identified. PH1 exhibited the most robust response defined by the greatest increase in insulin sensitivity over time (β ± SE, linear 0.52 ± 0.17, P < .001; quadratic -0.03 ± 0.01, P = .001). PH2 showed non-significant changes, while PH3 demonstrated modest short-term increases in insulin sensitivity which were not sustained over time (linear 0.08 ± 0.03, P = .002; quadratic -0.01 ± 0.002, P = .003). At baseline, PH3 (1.1 ± 0.4) was the most insulin resistant phenotype and exhibited the highest BMI% (98.5 ± 1.1%), 2 hours glucose concentrations (144.0 ± 27.5 mg/dL), and lowest beta-cell function as estimated by the oral disposition index (4.5 ± 2.8). CONCLUSION: Response to lifestyle intervention varies among Latino youth with obesity and suggests that precision approaches are warranted to meet the prevention needs of high risk youth.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the heterogeneity in response to lifestyle intervention among Latino adolescents with obesity. METHODS: We conducted secondary data analysis of 90 Latino adolescents (age 15.4 ± 0.9 y, female 56.7%) with obesity (BMI% 98.1 ± 1.5%) that were enrolled in a 3 month lifestyle intervention and were followed for a year. Covariance pattern mixture models identified response phenotypes defined by changes in insulin sensitivity as measured using a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test. Baseline characteristics were compared across response phenotypes using one-way ANOVA and chi-square test. RESULTS: Three distinct response phenotypes (PH1, PH2, PH3) were identified. PH1 exhibited the most robust response defined by the greatest increase in insulin sensitivity over time (β ± SE, linear 0.52 ± 0.17, P < .001; quadratic -0.03 ± 0.01, P = .001). PH2 showed non-significant changes, while PH3 demonstrated modest short-term increases in insulin sensitivity which were not sustained over time (linear 0.08 ± 0.03, P = .002; quadratic -0.01 ± 0.002, P = .003). At baseline, PH3 (1.1 ± 0.4) was the most insulin resistant phenotype and exhibited the highest BMI% (98.5 ± 1.1%), 2 hours glucose concentrations (144.0 ± 27.5 mg/dL), and lowest beta-cell function as estimated by the oral disposition index (4.5 ± 2.8). CONCLUSION: Response to lifestyle intervention varies among Latino youth with obesity and suggests that precision approaches are warranted to meet the prevention needs of high risk youth.
Authors: Blaise A Nemeth; Aaron L Carrel; Jens Eickhoff; R Randall Clark; Susan E Peterson; David B Allen Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2009-01-23 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: N Stefan; F Machicao; H Staiger; J Machann; F Schick; O Tschritter; C Spieth; C Weigert; A Fritsche; M Stumvoll; H U Häring Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Kim M Huffman; Timothy R Koves; Monica J Hubal; Hiba Abouassi; Nina Beri; Lori A Bateman; Robert D Stevens; Olga R Ilkayeva; Eric P Hoffman; Deborah M Muoio; William E Kraus Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Catherine W Yeckel; Ram Weiss; James Dziura; Sara E Taksali; Sylvie Dufour; Tania S Burgert; William V Tamborlane; Sonia Caprio Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.958