Literature DB >> 32939673

Comparative Analysis of the Expression of Chondroitin Sulfate Subtypes and Their Inhibitory Effect on Axonal Growth in the Embryonic, Adult, and Injured Rat Brains.

Moon Hang Kim1, So Ra Park2, Byung Hyune Choi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycans (CS-GAGs) are the primary inhibitory GAGs for neuronal growth after central nervous system (CNS) injury. However, the inhibitory or permissive activity of CS-GAG subtypes is controversial and depends on the physiological needs of CNS tissues. In this study, we investigated the characteristics and effects of CS-GAGs on axonal growth, which was isolated from the brain cortices of normal rat embryo at E18, normal adult rat brain and injured adult rat brain.
METHODS: Isolated CS-GAGs from embryo, normal adult, and injured adult rat brains were used for analyzing their effect on attachment and axonal growth using modified spot assay with dorsal root ganglion (DRG) explants and cerebellar granule neurons (CGNs). CS-GAGs were separated using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the subtypes of CS-GAGs were analyzed.
RESULTS: CS-GAGs of all three groups inhibited CGN attachment and axonal growth of DRGs. However, CS-GAGs of normal adult rat brain exhibited higher inhibitory activity than those of the other groups in both assays. When subtypes of CS-GAGs were analyzed using HPLC, CS-A (4S) was the most abundant in all three groups and found in largest amount in normal adult rat brain. In contrast, unsulfated CS (CS0) and CS-C (6S) were more abundant by 3-4-folds in E18 group than in the two adult groups.
CONCLUSION: When compared with the normal adult rat brain, injured rat brain showed relatively similar patterns to that of embryonic rat brain at E18 in the expression of CS subtypes and their inhibitory effect on axonal growth. This phenomenon could be due to differential expression of CS-GAGs subtypes causing decrease in the amount of CS-A and mature-type CS proteoglycan core proteins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain injury; CNS development; Chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycan; Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan

Year:  2020        PMID: 32939673      PMCID: PMC7862476          DOI: 10.1007/s13770-020-00295-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1738-2696            Impact factor:   4.169


  59 in total

Review 1.  Isolation and purification of chondroitin sulfate.

Authors:  Luiz-Claudio F Silva
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2006

2.  Cell culture of primary cerebellar granule cells.

Authors:  Dana Krämer; Liliana Minichiello
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Perineuronal Nets: Plasticity, Protection, and Therapeutic Potential.

Authors:  Amy C Reichelt; Dominic J Hare; Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Glial scar borders are formed by newly proliferated, elongated astrocytes that interact to corral inflammatory and fibrotic cells via STAT3-dependent mechanisms after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ina B Wanner; Mark A Anderson; Bingbing Song; Jaclynn Levine; Ana Fernandez; Zachary Gray-Thompson; Yan Ao; Michael V Sofroniew
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A sulfated carbohydrate epitope inhibits axon regeneration after injury.

Authors:  Joshua M Brown; Jiang Xia; BinQuan Zhuang; Kin-Sang Cho; Claude J Rogers; Cristal I Gama; Manish Rawat; Sarah E Tully; Noriko Uetani; Daniel E Mason; Michel L Tremblay; Eric C Peters; Osami Habuchi; Dong F Chen; Linda C Hsieh-Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Following experimental stroke, the recovering brain is vulnerable to lipoxygenase-dependent semaphorin signaling.

Authors:  Anton Pekcec; Kazim Yigitkanli; Joo Eun Jung; Stefanie Pallast; Changhong Xing; Alexander Antipenko; Maria Minchenko; Dimitar B Nikolov; Theodore R Holman; Eng H Lo; Klaus van Leyen
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  The trip of the tip: understanding the growth cone machinery.

Authors:  Laura Anne Lowery; David Van Vactor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  The Cspg2 gene, disrupted in the hdf mutant, is required for right cardiac chamber and endocardial cushion formation.

Authors:  C H Mjaatvedt; H Yamamura; A A Capehart; D Turner; R R Markwald
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Proteoglycan-specific molecular switch for RPTPσ clustering and neuronal extension.

Authors:  Charlotte H Coles; Yingjie Shen; Alan P Tenney; Christian Siebold; Geoffrey C Sutton; Weixian Lu; John T Gallagher; E Yvonne Jones; John G Flanagan; A Radu Aricescu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Pharmacological Suppression of CNS Scarring by Deferoxamine Reduces Lesion Volume and Increases Regeneration in an In Vitro Model for Astroglial-Fibrotic Scarring and in Rat Spinal Cord Injury In Vivo.

Authors:  Christina Francisca Vogelaar; Brigitte König; Stefanie Krafft; Veronica Estrada; Nicole Brazda; Brigida Ziegler; Andreas Faissner; Hans Werner Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Induces Cholinergic Differentiation of Tonsil-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Song; Se-Young Oh; Sangmee Ahn Jo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.451

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.