Literature DB >> 32939448

Splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic pathology: Modern morbidity, mortality, and long-term outcomes.

Wilson M Alobuia1, Kenneth Perrone1, David J Iberri2, Rondeep S Brar2, David A Spain1, Joseph D Forrester1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of splenectomy to diagnose and treat hematologic disease continues to evolve. In this single-center retrospective review, we describe modern morbidity, mortality, and long-term outcomes associated with splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic disorders.
METHODS: We analyzed all nontrauma splenectomies performed for benign or malignant hematologic disorders from January 2009 to September 2018. Variables collected included demographics, preexisting comorbidities, laboratory results, intra- and postoperative features, and long-term follow-up. Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and overall mortality.
RESULTS: We identified 161 patients who underwent splenectomy for hematologic disorders. Median age was 54 years (range 19-94), and 83 (52%) were female. Splenectomy was performed for 95 (59%) patients with benign hematologic disorders and for 66 (41%) with malignant conditions. Most splenectomies were laparoscopic (76%), followed by laparoscopic hand assisted (11%), open (8%), and laparoscopic converted to open (6%). Median follow-up was 761 days (interquartile range: 179-2025 days). Major complications occurred in 21 (13%) patients. Three (2%) patients died within 30 days; 16 (9%) died more than 30 days after operation, none from surgical complications, with median time to death of 438 days (interquartile range: 231-1497 days). Among malignant cases, only preoperative thrombocytopenia predicted death (odds ratio = 5.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-31.8, P = .04). For benign cases, increasing age was associated with inferior survival (odds ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.0-5.1, P = .05).
CONCLUSION: Splenectomy remains an important diagnostic and therapeutic option for patients with benign and malignant hematologic disorders and can be performed with a low complication rate. Despite considerable burden of comorbid disease in these patients, early postoperative mortality was uncommon.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32939448      PMCID: PMC7479208          DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2020.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Open Sci        ISSN: 2589-8450


BACKGROUND

Splenectomy has been an essential diagnostic and therapeutic option in the management of benign and malignant hematologic disorders. Indications for splenectomy have evolved owing to improvements in noninvasive diagnostic testing, availability of medical therapies, and advances in surgical techniques including laparoscopy [[1], [2], [3]]. Physician and patient perceptions of perioperative and long-term risks associated with splenectomy may dissuade them from pursuing surgical intervention, especially with the increase in number of medical therapies. This has created the perception of splenectomy as a third-line option and could lead to delays in surgical therapy which may impact patient outcomes [4]. The burden of pathology associated with the underlying hematologic disease, potential adverse effects of medical therapy, and patients' goals of care mandate a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of splenectomy in an increasingly complex treatment landscape [[5], [6], [7]]. Yet, the morbidity and mortality rates of splenectomy remain incompletely characterized. To inform this decision making, we describe the modern morbidity, mortality, and long-term outcomes associated with splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic conditions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of splenectomies performed for benign or malignant hematologic disorders at our institution from January 1, 2009, to September 15, 2018. All patients undergoing splenectomy with concomitant diagnoses of benign or malignant hematologic pathology were included. Splenectomies performed for trauma or for other nonhematologic malignancies and splenectomies performed on persons < 18 years of age were excluded. Variables assessed included demographics, preexisting comorbidities and laboratory results, intra- and postoperative features, and long-term follow-up variables. Leukopenia was defined as a white blood cell count < 4.0 × 109/L. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin < 12 g/dL for females and < 13 g/dL for males. Thrombocytopenia was defined as < 50,000 platelets/μL. Hypoalbuminemia was defined as < 3.5 g/dL. An elevated total bilirubin was defined as > 1.2 mg/dL. Coagulopathy was defined as an international normalized ratio > 1.3. Patient records were evaluated until death or last documented follow-up within our health care system. Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and overall mortality. Complications were evaluated as end points independent of death. Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for univariate analysis where appropriate. An a priori P value considered significant on univariate analysis for inclusion into multivariate models was P < .1; a P < .05 was considered significant on multivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of postoperative complication and mortality. Stata 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used for statistical analyses. This study received institutional review board approval.

RESULTS

There were 161 patients who had a splenectomy over the 10-year time period (Table I). Ninety-five (59%) patients had a splenectomy performed for benign conditions, with immune thrombocytopenia being the most common indication (n = 60, 63% of benign indications). Sixty-six (41%) patients had a splenectomy performed for malignant conditions; the most frequent diagnosis was marginal zone lymphoma (n = 13, 20% of malignant indications). Median patient age was 54 years (range: 19–94), and 83 (52%) were female. Patients diagnosed with malignant disease were significantly older (62 vs 45 years, P < .0001). Common comorbidities among patients included anemia (n = 93/152, 61%), hypoalbuminemia (n = 55/112, 49%), hypertension (n = 62/159, 39%), chronic steroid use (n = 61/161, 38%), and a history of smoking (n = 66/161, 41%). Chronic steroid use was more common among patients with benign pathology (58% vs 9%, P < .0001). The only patients who were partially or completely dependent on others with respect to activities of daily living were patients with hematologic malignancies (n = 5, 7%). Leukopenia was more common among patients with hematologic malignancies compared to benign pathology (32% vs 9%, P = .001).
Table I

Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables for patients undergoing splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic malignancy (2009–2018)

All casesBenign (n = 95)Malignant (n = 66)P value
Demographic variables
Male sex (%)78 (48)35 (37)43 (64)P < .0001
Age, median (range), y54 (19–94)45 (19–94)62 (21–83)P < .0001
Race, no. (%)
 White99 (61)51 (54)48 (73)P = .01
 Hispanic28 (17)23 (24)5 (8)
 Asian18 (11)8 (8)10 (15)
 Other11 (7)8 (8)3 (5)
 Black3 (2)3 (3)0 (0)
 Native Hawaiian1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)
 American Indian1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)
Benign, no. (%)95 (59)
 Autoimmune hemolytic anemia19 (12)
 Beta thalassemia1 (1)
 Evans syndrome4 (2)
 Hereditary spherocytosis10 (6)
 Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura60 (37)
 Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura1 (1)
Malignant, no. (%)66 (41)
 Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma1 (1)
 B-cell lymphoma5 (3)
 Chronic lymphoblastic leukemia5 (3)
 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma9 (6)
 Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia1 (1)
 Epstein-Barr virus–related T-cell lymphoproliferative syndrome1 (1)
 Follicular lymphoma4 (2)
 Hodgkin lymphoma5 (3)
 Large B-cell lymphoma3 (2)
 Low-grade B-cell lymphoma4 (2)
 Mantle cell lymphoma6 (4)
 Marginal zone lymphoma13 (8)
 Myelodysplastic syndrome1 (1)
 Natural killer cell low-grade lymphoma1 (1)
 T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia2 (1)
 T-cell lymphoma5 (3)
Comorbidities, no. (%)
 Hypertension62 (39)35 (37)27 (41)P = .6
 Hyperlipidemia41 (25)19 (20)22 (33)P = .07
 Diabetes26 (16)15 (16)11 (16)P = 1.0
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6 (4)5 (5)1 (1)P = .4
 Asthma8 (5)5 (5)3 (4)P = 1.0
 Renal disease12 (7)8 (8)4 (6)P = .8
 Cardiac disease22 (14)10 (11)12 (18)P = .2
 Chronic steroid use61 (38)55 (58)6 (9)P < .0001
 Current or former smoker56 (35)28 (29)28 (42)P = .1
 Partially or completely dependent5 (3)0 (0)5 (7)P = .01
 Leukopenia29 (19)8 (9)21 (32)P = .001
 Anemia93 (61)50 (56)43 (67)P = .2
 Thrombocytopenia46 (30)31 (35)15 (23)P = .1
 Hypoalbuminemia55 (49)30 (50)25 (48)P = .9
 Coagulopathy22 (24)9 (18)13 (32)P = .1
 Hyperbilirubinemia29 (26)17 (29)12 (23)P = .5



Treatment and outcome variables
Splenectomy approach, no. (%)
 Open12 (8)5 (5)7 (11)P < .0001
 Laparoscopic122 (76)83 (88)39 (59)
 Laparoscopic hand assisted18 (11)5 (5)13 (20)
 Laparoscopic converted to open9 (6)2 (2)7 (11)
Intraoperative transfusion required, no. (%)33 (20)17 (18)16 (24)P = .3
Weight of spleen, median (range), g306.5 (49–5650)182.5 (49–1900)742 (82–5650)P < .0001
Accessory spleen present, no. (%)13 (8)9 (9)4 (6)P = 1.0
Hospital length of stay, median (range), d2 (1–41)2 (1–27)3 (1–41)P = .01
Required intensive care unit admission, no. (%)9 (6)5 (5)4 (6)P = 1.0
Patients with complications, no. (%)21 (13)14 (15)7 (11)P = .5
 Portal, mesenteric, or splenic vein thrombosis9 (6)7 (7)2 (3)P = .3
 Postoperative bleed requiring transfusion5 (3)2 (2)3 (4)P = .4
 DVT or pulmonary embolism5 (3)4 (4)1 (2)P = .6
 Surgical site infection5 (3)3 (3)2 (3)P = 1.0
 Sepsis4 (2)3 (3)1 (1)P = .6
 Pneumonia3 (2)2 (2)1 (1)P = 1.0
 Pancreatic leak2 (1)1 (1)1 (1)P = 1.0
 Renal failure1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)P = 1.0
 Overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)P = 1.0
 Reoperation required1 (1)1 (1)0 (0)P = 1.0
 Postoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis used81 (50)41 (43)40 (61)P = .04
 Postdischarge DVT chemoprophylaxis prescribed20 (12)18 (19)2 (3)P = .003
Total deaths, no. (%)19 (12)5 (5)14 (21)P = .005
 Death within 30 d, no. (%)3 (2)2 (2)1 (1)P = 1.0
 Death after 30 d, no. (%)16 (9)3 (3)13 (19)P = .001
Time to death if more than 30 d after surgery, median (range), d447 (44–2477)378 (250–2477)447 (44–2052)P = .6
Follow-up, median (range), d761 (2–3560)643 (2–3323)917 (6–3560)P = .1

DVT, deep vein thrombosis.

Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables for patients undergoing splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic malignancy (2009–2018) DVT, deep vein thrombosis. There were 122 (76%) laparoscopic splenectomies, 18 (11%) laparoscopic hand-assisted splenectomies, 12 (8%) open splenectomies, and 9 (6%) laparoscopic converted to open splenectomies. Average spleen weight in our cohort was 306.5 g (range: 49.0–5650.0 g), and spleen weight was significantly higher in the malignant group (742.0 vs 182.5 g, P < .0001). Open, laparoscopic hand-assisted, and laparoscopic cases converted to open were more common among patients with hematologic malignancies when compared to benign pathology (11% vs 5%, 20% vs 5%, and 11% vs 2%, respectively; P < .0001). Thirty-three (20%) splenectomies required intraoperative transfusion with packed red blood cells, fresh-frozen plasma, or platelets because of preoperative anemia or thrombocytopenia and intraoperative blood loss. Median hospital length of stay was 2 (range: 1–41) days, and 9 (6%) patients required intensive care unit admission postoperatively. The median hospital length of stay was longer for patients with hematologic malignancies versus those with benign disorders (2 vs 3 days, P = .01). The most common complication after surgery was portal, mesenteric, or splenic vein thrombosis (n = 9, 6%). Other postoperative complications included postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion (n = 5, 3%), peripheral deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (n = 5, 3%), surgical site infection (n = 5, 3%), sepsis (n = 4, 2%), pneumonia (n = 3, 2%), pancreatic leak (n = 2, 1%), renal failure (n = 1, 1%), and overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis (n = 1, 1%). Complication rates were not significantly different between patients with benign and malignant pathology. Reoperation for bleeding was required for 1 (1%) patient. Nineteen (12%) patients died during follow-up, 3 (2%) of whom died within 30 days. Of the 3 patients who died within 30 days of surgery, 1 was a patient with T-cell lymphoma who died after suffering a cerebrovascular accident and decompensated heart failure on postoperative day (POD)6. The second patient with a diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) died after developing diffuse alveolar hemorrhage and respiratory failure on POD13. The third patient with a diagnosis of Evans syndrome died on POD15 after developing a pulmonary embolus and cardiac arrest. Among the 16 (9%) of patients who died after 30 days, median time to death was 438 (interquartile range [IQR]: 231–1497) days. Death after 30 days was more common among patients with hematologic malignancy (n = 13, 19%) compared to patients with benign pathology (n = 3, 3%, P = .001) (Fig). Median follow-up among all patients, both those who survived and those who died, was 761 (IQR: 179–2025) days.
Fig

Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimates for patients after splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic pathology.

Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimates for patients after splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic pathology. Eighty-one (50%) patients were started postoperatively on venous thromboembolic (VTE) chemoprophylaxis, more commonly among patients with malignant than benign disorders (61% vs 43%, P = .04). Receipt of VTE prophylaxis was not associated with a reduction in VTE incidence or an increase in bleeding rates compared to patients who did not receive VTE prophylaxis, although event rates were low. In univariate analysis of patients with benign hematologic disorders, demographic variables associated with complications included male sex (n = 2/13, 15%, P = .1), anemia (n = 10/13, 77%, P = .1), coagulopathy (n = 3/7, 43%, P = .06), and hyperbilirubinemia (5/6, 83%, P = .006) (Table II). Variables associated with mortality on univariate analysis among the same benign hematologic pathology subgroup included increased age (P = .006), hypertension (n = 4/5, 80%, P = .06), anemia (n = 5/5, 100%, P = .07), and hypoalbuminemia (n = 4/4, 100%, P = .05). On multivariate analysis, no patient demographic factors were associated with development of complications. Even after excluding patients with ITP, no demographic variable was associated with development of complications. Only increased age was associated with death after splenectomy for benign hematologic conditions (odds ratio [OR] = 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–5.11) on multivariate analysis.
Table II

Predictors of complications and death after splenectomy for benign conditions

All patients (n = 95)Complications (n = 14)P valueDeath (n = 5)P value
Demographic variables
Male sex, no. (%)35 (37)2 (15)P = .11 (20)P = .6
Age, median (range), y44 (19–94)48 (22–94)P = .765 (50–94)P = .006
Race, no. (%)
 White51 (54)8 (57)P = .83 (60)P = .9
 Hispanic23 (24)5 (36)2 (40)
 Asian8 (8)1 (7)
 Other8 (8)
 Black3 (3)
 Native Hawaiian1 (1)
 American Indian1 (1)
Hypertension, no. (%)35 (37)6 (43)P = 1.04 (80)P = .06
Hyperlipidemia, no. (%)19 (20)3 (23)P = .72 (40)P = .3
Diabetes, no. (%)15 (16)1 (8)P = .50 (0)P = 1.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, no. (%)5 (5)2 (15)P = .21 (20)P = .2
Asthma, no. (%)5 (5)0 (0)P = 1.00 (0)P = 1.0
Renal disease, no. (%)8 (8)1 (8)P = 1.00 (0)P = 1.0
Cardiac disease, no. (%)10 (11)1 (8)P = 1.01 (20)P = .44
Chronic steroid use, no. (%)55 (58)9 (64)P = .84 (80)P = .4
Current or former smoker, no. (%)28 (30)4 (31)P = 1.02 (40)P = .6
Partially or completely dependent, no. (%)0 (0)
Leukopenia, no. (%)8 (9)2 (15)P = .31 (20)P = .4
Anemia, no. (%)50 (56)10 (77)P = .15 (100)P = .07
Thrombocytopenia, no. (%)31 (35)4 (31)P = 1.03 (60)P = .3
Hypoalbuminemia, no. (%)30 (50)3 (50)P = 1.04 (100)P = .05
Coagulopathy, no. (%)9 (18)3 (43)P = .061 (33)P = .4
Hyperbilirubinemia, no. (%)17 (29)5 (83)P = .0061 (25)P = 1.0



Treatment and outcome variables
Splenectomy approach, no. (%)
 Open5 (5)0 (0)P = .11 (20)P = .1
 Laparoscopic83 (88)11 (85)3 (60)
 Laparoscopic hand assisted5 (5)2 (17)1 (20)
 Laparoscopic converted to open2 (2)1 (7)0 (0)
Intraoperative transfusion required, no. (%)17 (18)4 (29)P = .33 (60)P = .04
Weight of spleen, median (range), g182.5 (49–1900)260 (88–870)P = .3181 (71–360)P = .5
Accessory spleen present, no. (%)9 (9)2 (14)P = .61 (20)P = .4
Hospital length of stay, median (range), d2 (1–27)3 (1–27)P = .056 (1–14)P = .05
Required intensive care unit admission, no. (%)5 (5)4 (31)P = .0012 (40)P = .02
Duration intensive care unit admission, median (range), d< 1 (< 1–12)< 1 (< 1–12)P < .0001< 1 (< 1–12)P < .0001
 Postoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis used41 (43)8 (57)P = .42 (40)P = 1.0
 Postdischarge DVT chemoprophylaxis prescribed18 (19)2 (11)P = 1.00 (0)P = .6
Predictors of complications and death after splenectomy for benign conditions Among patients who underwent splenectomy for malignant hematologic indications, chronic steroid use (n = 2/7, 29%, P = .1), thrombocytopenia (n = 5/8, 63%, P = .006), hypoalbuminemia (n = 6/7, 86%, P = .04), and coagulopathy (n = 4/6, 67%, P = .03) were associated with complications on univariate analysis (Table III). Hypertension (n = 3/14, 21%, P = .1), thrombocytopenia (n = 7/14, 50%, P = .01), hypoalbuminemia (n = 9/12, 75%, P = .05), and hyperbilirubinemia (n = 5/12, 42%, P = .1) were associated with death on univariate analysis. Similar to patients with benign disorders, on multivariate analysis, there were no demographic variables that remained associated with the composite complication variable among patients with malignant conditions; only thrombocytopenia was associated with death (OR = 5.76, 95% CI 1.05–31.77, P = .04).
Table III

Predictors of complications and death after splenectomy for malignant conditions

All patients (n = 66)Complications (n = 7)P valueDeath (n = 14)P value
Demographic variables
Male sex, no. (%)43 (64)5 (63)P = 1.08 (57)P = .5
Age, median (range), y62 (21–83)68 (45–74)P = .259 (34–83)P = .6
Race, no. (%)
 White48 (73)5 (71)P = .810 (71)P = .3
 Hispanic5 (8)1 (14)
 Asian10 (15)1 (14)4 (29)
 Other3 (5)
 Black0 (0)
 Native Hawaiian0 (0)
 American Indian0 (0)
Hypertension, no. (%)27 (41)3 (43)P = 1.03 (21)P = .1
Hyperlipidemia, no. (%)22 (33)2 (25)P = 1.05 (36)P = 1.0
Diabetes, no. (%)11 (16)0 (0)P = .32 (14)P = 1.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, no. (%)1 (1)0 (0)P = 1.00 (0)P = 1.0
Asthma, no. (%)3 (4)1 (14)P = .32 (14)P = .1
Renal disease, no. (%)4 (6)0 (0)P = 1.00 (0)P = 1.0
Cardiac disease, no. (%)12 (18)1 (14)P = 1.01 (7)P = .44
Chronic steroid use, no. (%)6 (9)2 (29)P = .11 (7)P = 1.0
Current or former smoker, no. (%)28 (42)2 (25)P = .76 (43)P = 1.0
Partially or completely dependent, no. (%)5 (7)1 (13)P = .42 (14)P = .3
Leukopenia, no. (%)21 (32)3 (43)P = .76 (43)P = .4
Anemia, no. (%)43 (67)6 (86)P = .411 (79)P = .4
Thrombocytopenia, no. (%)15 (23)5 (63)P = .0067 (50)P = .01
Hypoalbuminemia, no. (%)25 (48)6 (86)P = .049 (75)P = .05
Coagulopathy, no. (%)13 (32)4 (67)P = .034 (40)P = .7
Hyperbilirubinemia, no. (%)12 (23)3 (43)P = .35 (42)P = .1



Treatment and outcome variables
Splenectomy approach, no. (%)
 Open7 (11)1 (14)P = .30 (0)P = .08
 Laparoscopic39 (59)3 (43)8 (57)
 Laparoscopic hand assisted13 (20)1 (14)2 (14)
 Laparoscopic converted to open7 (11)2 (29)4 (29)
Intraoperative transfusion required, no. (%)16 (24)5 (71)P = .0077 (50)P = .03
Weight of spleen, median (range), g742 (82–5650)800 (265–5650)P = .8762 (190–2850)P = .4
Accessory spleen present, no. (%)4 (6)0 (0)P = 1.00 (0)P = .6
Hospital length of stay, median (range), d3 (1–41)6 (1–18)P = .084 (1–26)P = .09
Required intensive care unit admission, no. (%)4 (6)1 (13)P = .40 (0)P = .6
Duration intensive care unit admission, median (range), d< 1 (< 1–12)N/AN/AN/AN/A
 Postoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis used40 (61)2 (29)P = .16 (15)P = .1
 Postdischarge DVT chemoprophylaxis prescribed2 (3)0 (0)P = 1.00 (0)P = 1.0

N/A, not applicable. Only 1 patient.

Predictors of complications and death after splenectomy for malignant conditions N/A, not applicable. Only 1 patient.

DISCUSSION

New treatment options have emerged for the management of benign and malignant hematologic disorders including the use of monoclonal antibodies, immune-modulating therapies, and synthetic thrombopoietin receptor agonists [8,9]. As a result, indications for splenectomy in the management of these diseases have undergone considerable evolution over the last decade [10,11]. Despite these new treatment options, surgical intervention with splenectomy has remained an important diagnostic and therapeutic option for patients with recalcitrant disease and complications from splenomegaly. In this single-center retrospective analysis, we describe 161 patients who underwent splenectomy for a variety of benign and malignant hematologic disorders. We demonstrate that the majority of patients in this cohort underwent successful splenectomy with a relatively low rate of postoperative complications. Both short- and long-term postoperative mortality rates were low in our cohort. Most (76%) patients are able to undergo laparoscopic surgery, irrespective of spleen size. This is consistent with recent findings that laparoscopic splenectomy has replaced open splenectomy as the criterion standard surgical intervention even in patients with massive splenomegaly [12]. Both laparoscopic splenectomy and open splenectomy were performed with very low rates of complications. The most common complication was portal, mesenteric, and splenic vein thrombosis (cumulative 6%). After identification of thrombosis, these patients were treated successfully with systemic anticoagulation and did not require further operative intervention. This is consistent with practice recommendations from a meta-analysis which showed 67% complete resolution of symptomatic splenic vein thrombosis after splenectomy with therapeutic anticoagulation [13]. The increased risk of portal vein thrombosis in patients undergoing splenectomy is thought to be secondary to the acute increase in platelet count and reduction in portal blood flow after removal of the spleen [14]. Interestingly, the use of postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis was associated with neither VTE incidence nor bleeding rate. It is important to note that our study was retrospective and not adequately powered to evaluate or quantify the impact of VTE prophylaxis on thrombosis or bleeding risk. A recent meta-analysis by Qi et al showed that prophylactic anticoagulation led to a decrease in portal venous system thrombosis with no increased risk of bleeding in patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism. However, the effect in patients with hematological disorders remained inconclusive because of limited evidence [15]. Given the variability in VTE chemoprophylaxis prescribing patterns [16], a prospective randomized study evaluating chemical prophylaxis in patients with hematologic disorders undergoing splenectomy seems warranted. The overall long-term survival in our patient population was favorable. Throughout the 30-day follow-up period, mortality rate was low, and none of the deaths was directly related to surgical intervention but rather due to complications from progressive hematologic disease. Compared to 2 previous studies, we observed significantly lower rates of postoperative complications and mortality [17,18]. Although this could be explained by the relatively shorter duration of follow-up in our study (10 vs 27 years), we believe that this reduction in postoperative complications and mortality is likely due to improved understanding of the underlying disease processes, better critical care, and more effective perioperative management [19]. The low perioperative mortality, despite the slightly shorter follow-up period in our study, supports our conclusion that splenectomy is safe and can be used as a low-risk diagnostic and therapeutic option when appropriately used. Independent predictors of mortality in our patient population were increased age (among patients with benign disease) and thrombocytopenia (among patients with malignant disease). Bagrodia et al in their analysis of the morbidity and mortality after elective splenectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database also found increased age and preoperative albumin level to be independent predictors of mortality [17]. When discussing potential outcomes, older patients should be warned that they may be at higher risk of adverse events. Frail older adults may be at particularly high risk. Although we were not able to capture frailty in our retrospective patient cohort, frailty is increasingly shown to be a more specific predictor of postoperative morbidity than age [20]. The impact of frailty may be particularly pronounced among patients who are immunosuppressed as a result of their underlying pathology or treatment. Thrombocytopenia is commonly observed among patients with hematologic malignancy and can be seen in 5%–30% of patients depending on the underlying pathology. In our cohort, thrombocytopenia was an independent predictor of mortality among patients with malignant hematologic disorders. Recent data among critically ill patients with hematologic malignancy indicate inferior outcomes among patients with thrombocytopenia and organ failure compared to those without [19]. It is possible that preexisting thrombocytopenia is reflective of more advanced disease preoperatively, resulting from chemotherapy, disseminated intravascular coagulation, bone marrow failure, or a combination thereof [19]. At our institution, patients undergoing elective splenectomy for benign/malignant diseases typically receive vaccination against encapsulated organisms (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type B, Neisseria meningitidis) 2 weeks or more prior to their operation. In cases where an emergent operation is performed, the prophylactic vaccines are administered in the postoperative period prior to discharge. All patients are educated regarding the risks of asplenia, immunosuppression, and overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis. Barring any postoperative complications, patients are seen in scheduled follow-up 2 weeks postdischarge. There are several limitations to this study. Firstly, this was a retrospective, single-institution study, and as such, our results may not be generalizable to other patient populations or institutions. Secondly, because we did not do a subgroup analysis of the various benign and malignant hematologic conditions, it is possible that important predictors of both morbidity and mortality in these patients could be obscured or missed for specific disease entities. Given the low group numbers of some of the conditions, we elected to not do specific subgroup analyses beyond malignant or benign categories. Finally, our study only included patients with hematologic diseases who underwent splenectomy. We did not include patients who were never referred to a surgeon or who were not taken for splenectomy after evaluation by a surgeon. We are unable to compare survival rates after surgery to a control group of patients with hematologic disorders not undergoing splenectomy. Selection bias may be present among patients undergoing surgery, as patients too frail to undergo surgery were selected out. In conclusion, splenectomy remains an important adjunct for the management of patients with both benign and malignant hematologic disorders and can be performed with a low rate of complications using minimally invasive strategies. Despite a considerable burden of comorbid disease in this patient population, early postoperative mortality is uncommon, and the overall long-term survival after splenectomy is measured in years. Surgical intervention should be considered a tool that can be used selectively to improve outcomes in patients with hematologic disorders.

Author Contribution

Wilson M Alobuia: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft; Kenneth Perrone: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft; David J. Iberri: Resources, Writing – review & editing; Rondeep S. Brar: Resources, Writing – review & editing; David A. Spain: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing; Joseph D Forrester: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Funding Sources

No funding was used to produce this manuscript.
  20 in total

Review 1.  Rituximab plus standard of care for treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaan Chugh; Saeed Darvish-Kazem; Wendy Lim; Mark A Crowther; Waleed Ghanima; Grace Wang; Nancy M Heddle; John G Kelton; Donald M Arnold
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 18.959

Review 2.  Indications and outcome of splenectomy in hematologic disease.

Authors:  S Bonnet; A Guédon; J-A Ribeil; F Suarez; J Tamburini; S Gaujoux
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.043

3.  The evolving indications for splenectomy.

Authors:  Matthew G Browning; Naomi Bullen; Tim Nokes; Keri Tucker; Mark Coleman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Long-term risks after splenectomy among 8,149 cancer-free American veterans: a cohort study with up to 27 years follow-up.

Authors:  Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Gloria Gridley; Robert N Hoover; David Check; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Preoperative Frailty Evaluation: A Promising Risk-stratification Tool in Older Adults Undergoing General Surgery.

Authors:  Fred C Ko
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma with rituximab monotherapy: progress report and comparison with splenectomy.

Authors:  Christina Kalpadakis; Gerassimos A Pangalis; Maria K Angelopoulou; Sotirios Sachanas; Flora N Kontopidou; Xanthi Yiakoumis; Stella I Kokoris; Evagelia M Dimitriadou; Maria N Dimopoulou; Maria Moschogiannis; Penelope Korkolopoulou; Marie-Christine Kyrtsonis; Marina P Siakantaris; Theodora Papadaki; Panayiotis Tsaftaridis; Eleni Plata; Helen E Papadaki; Theodoros P Vassilakopoulos
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-01-23

7.  Variability in management of hematologic malignancy patients with venous thromboembolism and chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Terry Gernsheimer; Elihu Estey; David A Garcia
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 8.  International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Drew Provan; Roberto Stasi; Adrian C Newland; Victor S Blanchette; Paula Bolton-Maggs; James B Bussel; Beng H Chong; Douglas B Cines; Terry B Gernsheimer; Bertrand Godeau; John Grainger; Ian Greer; Beverley J Hunt; Paul A Imbach; Gordon Lyons; Robert McMillan; Francesco Rodeghiero; Miguel A Sanz; Michael Tarantino; Shirley Watson; Joan Young; David J Kuter
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Laparoscopic splenectomy in the management of benign and malignant hematologic diseases.

Authors:  Gianfranco Silecchia; Cristian Eugeniu Boru; Aldo Fantini; Luigi Raparelli; Francesco Greco; Mario Rizzello; Alessandro Pecchia; Paolo Fabiano; Nicola Basso
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Long-Term Outcome of Patients With a Hematologic Malignancy and Multiple Organ Failure Admitted at the Intensive Care.

Authors:  Vera A de Vries; Marcella C A Müller; M Sesmu Arbous; Bart J Biemond; Nicole M A Blijlevens; Nuray Kusadasi; Lambert R F Span; Alexander P J Vlaar; David J van Westerloo; Hanneke C Kluin-Nelemans; Walter M van den Bergh
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pancreatic Fistula and Biochemical Leak after Splenectomy: Incidence and Risk Factors-A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.

Authors:  T Vowinkel; F Becker; A S Mehdorn; A K Schwieters; W A Mardin; N Senninger; B Strücker; A Pascher
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.