Literature DB >> 32939381

Association of candidate pharmacogenetic markers with platinum-induced ototoxicity: PanCareLIFE dataset.

Thorsten Langer1, Eva Clemens2,3, Linda Broer4, Lara Maier5, André G Uitterlinden4, Andrica C H de Vries2,3, Martine van Grotel2, Saskia F M Pluijm2, Harald Binder6,7, Benjamin Mayer8, Annika von dem Knesebeck1, Julianne Byrne9, Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder2,10, Marco Crocco11, Desiree Grabow6, Peter Kaatsch6, Melanie Kaiser6, Claudia Spix6, Line Kenborg12, Jeanette F Winther12,13, Catherine Rechnitzer14, Henrik Hasle15, Tomas Kepak16, Anne-Lotte F van der Kooi2,17, Leontien C Kremer2,18, Jarmila Kruseova19, Stefan Bielack20, Benjamin Sorg20, Stefanie Hecker-Nolting20, Claudia E Kuehni21,22, Marc Ansari23, Martin Kompis24, Heleen J van der Pal2,18, Ross Parfitt25, Dirk Deuster25, Peter Matulat25, Amelie Tillmanns25, Wim J E Tissing2,26, Jörn D Beck27, Susanne Elsner28, Antoinette Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen25, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink2,3, Oliver Zolk29,5.   

Abstract

Genetic association studies suggest a genetic predisposition for cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Among other candidate genes, thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) is considered a critical gene for susceptibility to cisplatin-induced hearing loss in a pharmacogenetic guideline. The PanCareLIFE cross-sectional cohort study evaluated the genetic associations in a large pan-European population and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the genetic markers. 1,112 pediatric cancer survivors who had provided biomaterial for genotyping were screened for participation in the pharmacogenetic association study. 900 participants qualified for inclusion. Based on the assessment of original audiograms, patients were assigned to three phenotype categories: no, minor, and clinically relevant hearing loss. Fourteen variants in eleven candidate genes (ABCC3, OTOS, TPMT, SLC22A2, NFE2L2, SLC16A5, LRP2, GSTP1, SOD2, WFS1, and ACYP2) were genotyped. The genotype and phenotype data represent a resource for conducting meta-analyses to derive a more precise pooled estimate of the effects of genes on the risk of hearing loss due to platinum treatment.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse drug reaction; Cancer survivors; Childhood cancer; Cisplatin: carboplatin; Drug-induced ototoxicity; Genetic markers; Multicenter cohort study; Pharmacogenetics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32939381      PMCID: PMC7477761          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the Data This database describes genotypes of 14 candidate SNPs for cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in a large Pan-European cohort of pediatric cancer survivors treated with platinum. Epidemiologists interested in the frequency of platinum-induced ototoxicity as well as developers of long-term follow-up guidelines for survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers may benefit from these data. The genotype and phenotype data represent a resource for conducting meta-analyses to derive a more precise pooled estimate of the effects of genes on the risk of hearing loss due to platinum treatment.

Data Description

Table 1 summarize the genotype and allele frequencies of the study population, stratified according to the hearing loss phenotype.
Table 1

Number and frequency of genotypes and alleles for each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) according to audiological phenotypes. The last column shows the P-values of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) χ2 tests of the total cohort (n = 900).

SNPGenotype/ alleleNumber of genotypes / alleles
FrequencyHWE Chi-squared test P value
no hearing loss (n = 222)minor hearing loss (n = 481)clinically relevant hearing loss (n = 197)Total cohort (n = 900)
ABCC3rs1051640A/A1523371310.6650.85
A/G64128610.310
G/G61650.025
A3688023230.820
G76160710.180
ACYP2rs1872328G/G2044531850.9390.32
G/A1828120.061
A/A0000.000
G4269343820.970
A1828120.030
GSTP1rs1695A/A95221890.4520.58
A/G104212760.386
G/G2348320.162
A2946542540.645
G1503081400.355
LRP2rs2075252T/T1532120.0610.26
T/C79165740.376
C/C1282841110.563
T109229980.249
C3357332960.751
NFE2L2rs6721961T/T2730.0150.82
T/G5189500.254
G/G1693851440.731
T55103560.142
G3898593380.858
OTOSrs2291767T/T2154531880.9540.55
T/C72790.046
C/C0100.000
T4379333850.977
C72990.023
SLC16A5rs4788863T/T1637120.0610.27
T/C97199820.416
C/C1092451030.523
T1292731060.269
C3156892880.731
SLC22A2rs316019A/A3320.0100.43
A/C4485470.239
C/C1753931480.751
A5091510.129
C3948713430.871
SOD2rs4880A/A56106400.2030.36
A/G1092491050.533
G/G57126520.264
A2214611850.470
G2235012090.530
TPMTrs12201199A/A2054341740.8830.6
A/T1744230.117
T/T0300.000
A4279123710.942
T1750230.058
TPMTrs1142345T/T2114521820.9240.34
T/C1129150.076
C/C0000.000
T4339333790.962
C1129150.038
TPMTrs1800460C/C2124541840.9340.39
C/T1027130.066
T/T0000.000
C4349353810.967
T1027130.033
TPMTrs1800462C/C2204811960.9950.96
C/G2010.005
G/G0000.000
C4429623930.997
G2010.003
WFS1rs62283056G/G1383071240.6290.97
G/C79149650.330
C/C52580.041
G3557633130.794
C89199810.206
Number and frequency of genotypes and alleles for each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) according to audiological phenotypes. The last column shows the P-values of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) χ2 tests of the total cohort (n = 900). The supplementary Table 1 shows demographic and clinical variables at a patient-level of the total cohort (n = 900). Variables are described as follows: ID – Unique identification number assigned to each patient who was included in the analyses. RX – Cranial radiation (0) or no cranial radiation (1) SEX – Male (1) or female (2) PHENO – audiological phenotype: no hearing loss (0), minor hearing loss (1), clinically relevant hearing loss (2). Patients were assigned to the respective audiological phenotype based on the post-treatment audiograms of the patients, which were graded according to the Münster Classification. A detailed description of the phenotyping method is given below. AGEage at start of platinum treatment: < = 5 years (1),]5 years; 10 years] (2),]10 years; 15 years] (3), >15 years (4). CISPLATIN – Cumulative dose of cisplatin (mg) CARBOPLATIN – Cumulative dose of carboplatin (mg) DIAGNOSIS – the cancer diagnosis The supplementary Table 2 shows the genotype data at a patient-level of the total cohort (n = 900). Variables are described as follows: SAMPLE_ID – Unique identification number assigned to the gDNA sample of each patient included in the analyses. ABCC3_rs1051640 – the rs1051640 genotype: A/A (0), A/G (1), G/G (2) OTOS_rs2291767 – the rs2291767 genotype: T/T (0), T/C (1), C/C (2) TPMT_rs12201199 – the rs12201199 genotype: A/A (0), A/T (1), T/T (2) TPMT_rs1142345 – the rs1142345 genotype: T/T (0), T/C (1), C/C (2) TPMT_rs1800460 – the rs1800460 genotype: C/C (0), C/T (1), T/T (2) TPMT_rs1800462 – the rs1800462 genotype: C/C (0), C/G (1), G/G (2) SLC22A2_rs316019 – the rs316019 genotype: A/A (0), A/C (1), C/C (2) NFE2L2_rs6721961 – the rs6721961 genotype: T/T (0), T/G (1), G/G (2) WFS1_rs62283056 – the rs62283056 genotype: G/G (0), G/C (1), C/C (2) SLC16A5_rs4788863 –the rs4788863 genotype: T/T (0), T/C (1), C/C (2) LRP2_rs2075252 – the rs2075252 genotype: T/T (0), T/C (1), C/C (2) GSTP1_rs1695 – the rs1695 genotype: A/A (0), A/G (1), G/G (2) SOD2_rs4880 – the rs4880 genotype: A/A (0), A/G (1), G/G (2) ACYP2_rs1872328 – the rs1872328 genotype: G/G (0), G/A (1), A/A (2)

Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

Study design and participants

Background and methods of the European multicenter PanCareLIFE study have been described previously [1], [2], [3]. Patients were enrolled after approval was obtained from local review boards and written informed consent was obtained from patients, parents or legal guardians. Participants were enrolled both retrospectively and prospectively (i.e., chemotherapy was started and finished during the 5-year term of PanCareLIFE). Eligibility criteria were: 1) age at diagnosis <19 years, 2) treatment with cisplatin, carboplatin or both, 3) at least one pure tone audiometry within 5 years after the end of chemotherapy. Exclusion criteria were: 1) non-consent and 2) hearing loss before the start of platinum treatment. Patients of this larger ototoxicity cohort participated in the pharmacogenetic study if there was additional consent for the genetic analyses and biomaterial was provided.

Genotyping

Biosamples were sent to the PanCareLIFE genotyping center. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from EDTA blood samples with a QIAamp DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or from saliva samples (Oragene DNA collection kit, DNA Genotec, Ottawa, ON, Canada) using the prepIT L2P reagent (DNA Genotec, Ottawa, ON, Canada). All gDNA samples isolated were tested for quality (A260/A280 ratio of >1.9 and agarose gele electrophoresis) before any further work on DNA analysis. Samples were genotyped for 14 SNPs by TaqMan SNP genotyping using predesigned primers and probes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). In order not to lose too much statistical power, the number of candidate genes was limited to 11 with one SNP each except for TPMT, for which 4 SNPs were examined. The candidate SNPs were selected on the basis of the available evidence of association, taking into account the sample size of the discovery cohort and the effect size. The following SNPs were investigated: rs1872328 (ACYP2), rs2075252 (LRP2), rs6721961 (NFE2L2), rs2291767 (OTOS), rs62283056 (WFS1), rs12201199 (TPMT), rs1142345 (TPMT), rs1800460 (TPMT), rs1800462 (TPMT), rs4880 (SOD2), rs316019 (SLC22A2), rs1695 (GSTP1), rs1051640 (ABCC3), and rs4788863 (SLC16A5). Laboratory assistants were blinded to the audiological phenotype of the patients. Multiple positive and negative controls and replicate samples were included in the genotyping assays and plates. No genotype discordance of replicate samples was observed. Ten samples were finally excluded due to genotype call rate per sample <100%.

Audiological classification and phenotyping

All audiograms were independently rated by two reviewers for hearing loss according to the Münster classification [4,5]. Audiograms had to meet the following minimum requirements: frequencies include at least 2 or 3 kHz, 4 kHz, and 6 or 8 kHz (air-conduction), demonstrate no conductive hearing loss, absence of significant test artifacts (e.g., atypical air-bone configuration). Thereafter, two pediatric audiologists independently assessed the kinetic course of hearing loss for each patient. The minimum data requirement for phenotype assessment included the availability of a normal pre-treatment audiogram or a normal audiogram before the third platinum cycle and at least one post-treatment audiogram within 15 months after the last chemotherapy cycle. Sound field audiometry was also accepted if ear-specific pure-tone audiometry was subsequently performed. Three phenotype groups were defined as follows: no hearing loss, minor hearing loss, and clinically-relevant hearing loss at the end of treatment. Patients were assigned to the no hearing loss group if post-treatment audiograms were exclusively Münster class 0. Patients were also assigned to the group without hearing loss if post-treatment audiograms were almost exclusively graded as Münster class 0, no audiogram was classified as Münster >1, and the Münster class 1 audiogram was followed by a Münster class 0 audiogram. Patients were assigned to the clinically-relevant hearing loss group if follow-up audiograms indicated hearing loss of at least Münster class 2b. All other patients were classified as part of the minor hearing loss group. Inter-rater agreement was >95%. After completion, all cases that had been phenotyped differently by the two pediatric audiologists were discussed between them and an agreement was made.

Ethics Statement

The PanCareLIFE study has been approved by the local ethics committees: Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern, 362/2015; Comitate Etico Regionale, 507REG2014; Ethical Committee University Hospital Brno, June 11, 2016; Ethics Committee Fakultni Nemocnice v Motole, Prague; De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer Region Hovedstaden, H-1-2014-125; Ethikkommission Medizinische Universität Graz, 27-015 ex 14/15; Ethikkommission der Universität Ulm, 160/17; Ethikkommission der Universität zu Lübeck, 14/181; Ethik-Kommission der Ärztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 2014-619; Medische Ethische Toetsings Commissie Erasmus MC; Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie, 2015_202. The informed consent of the patient (if adult) or his/her legal representative has been obtained.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have, or could be perceived to have, influenced the work reported in this article.
SubjectOncology
Specific subject areaLate effects of cancer treatment; pharmacogenetics
Type of dataTable
How data were acquiredClinical data: from servers for the electronic medical records and registries and by manual review of patient medical charts.Genotype data: Applied Biosystems 7500 FastReal-Time PCR System
Data formatRawAnalyzedFiltered
Parameters for data collectionGenotype data: Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System Sequence Detection Software v1.4, automatic genotype call algorithm.
Description of data collectionClinical data: Data for enrolled patients from medical records were entered into a trial-specific database hosted at the German Childhood Cancer Registry.Genotype data: Genomic DNA was isolated from EDTA blood samples or saliva samples and tested for quality. Samples were genotyped for 14 SNPs by TaqMan SNP genotyping using predesigned primers and probes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).Audiological Classification and Phenotype data: Patients were assigned to one of three phenotypes based on the grading of the audiograms according to the Münster Classification.
Data source locationPanCareLIFE Data Center, German Childhood Cancer RegistryMainzGermany
Data accessibilityWith the article
Related research articleThorsten Langer, Eva Clemens, Linda Broer, Lara Maier, André G. Uitterlinden, Andrica C. H. de Vries, Martine van Grotel, Saskia F.M. Pluijm, Harald Binder, Benjamin Mayer, Annika von dem Knesebeck, Julianne Byrne, Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, Marco Crocco, Desiree Grabow, Peter Kaatsch, Melanie Kaiser, Claudia Spix, Line Kenborg, Jeanette F. Winther, Catherine Rechnitzer, Henrik Hasle, Tomas Kepak, Anne-Lotte F. van der Kooi, Leontien C. Kremer, Jarmila Kruseova, Stefan Bielack, Benjamin Sorg, Stefanie Hecker-Nolting, Claudia E. Kuehni, Marc Ansari, Martin Kompis, Heleen van der Pal, Ross Parfitt, Dirk Deuster, Peter Matulat, Amelie Tillmanns, Wim J. E. Tissing, Jörn D. Beck, Susanne Elsner, Antoinette am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, and Oliver Zolk, on behalf of the PanCareLIFE consortiumUsefulness of current candidate genetic markers to identify childhood cancer patients at risk for platinum-induced ototoxicity: results of the European PanCareLIFE cohort study. Eur. J. Cancer. In Press.
  4 in total

1.  [The "Muenster classification" of high frequency hearing loss following cisplatin chemotherapy].

Authors:  C-M Schmidt; E Bartholomäus; D Deuster; A Heinecke; A G Dinnesen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Childhood cancer survivor cohorts in Europe.

Authors:  Jeanette F Winther; Line Kenborg; Julianne Byrne; Lars Hjorth; Peter Kaatsch; Leontien C M Kremer; Claudia E Kuehni; Pascal Auquier; Gérard Michel; Florent de Vathaire; Riccardo Haupt; Roderick Skinner; Laura M Madanat-Harjuoja; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Finn Wesenberg; Raoul C Reulen; Desiree Grabow; Cecile M Ronckers; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Matthias Schindler; Julie Berbis; Anna S Holmqvist; Thorgerdur Gudmundsdottir; Sofie de Fine Licht; Trine G Bonnesen; Peter H Asdahl; Andrea Bautz; Anja K Kristoffersen; Liselotte Himmerslev; Henrik Hasle; Jørgen H Olsen; Mike M Hawkins
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  PanCareLIFE: The scientific basis for a European project to improve long-term care regarding fertility, ototoxicity and health-related quality of life after cancer occurring among children and adolescents.

Authors:  Julianne Byrne; Desiree Grabow; Helen Campbell; Kylie O'Brien; Stefan Bielack; Antoinette Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; Gabriele Calaminus; Leontien Kremer; Thorsten Langer; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Katja Baust; Andrea Bautz; Jörn D Beck; Claire Berger; Harald Binder; Anja Borgmann-Staudt; Linda Broer; Holger Cario; Leonie Casagranda; Eva Clemens; Dirk Deuster; Andrica de Vries; Uta Dirksen; Jeanette Falck Winther; Sophie Fosså; Anna Font-Gonzalez; Victoria Grandage; Riccardo Haupt; Stefanie Hecker-Nolting; Lars Hjorth; Melanie Kaiser; Line Kenborg; Tomas Kepak; Kateřina Kepáková; Lisbeth E Knudsen; Maryna Krawczuk-Rybak; Jarmila Kruseova; Claudia E Kuehni; Marina Kunstreich; Rahel Kuonen; Herwig Lackner; Alison Leiper; Erik A H Loeffen; Ales Luks; Dalit Modan-Moses; Renee Mulder; Ross Parfitt; Norbert W Paul; Andreas Ranft; Ellen Ruud; Ralph Schilling; Claudia Spix; Joanna Stefanowicz; Gabriele Strauβ; Andre G Uitterlinden; Marleen van den Berg; Anne-Lotte van der Kooi; Marloes van Dijk; Flora van Leeuwen; Oliver Zolk; Daniela Zöller; Peter Kaatsch
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Genetic Determinants of Ototoxicity During and After Childhood Cancer Treatment: Protocol for the PanCareLIFE Study.

Authors:  Eva Clemens; Annelot Jm Meijer; Linda Broer; Thorsten Langer; Anne-Lotte Lf van der Kooi; André G Uitterlinden; Andrica de Vries; Claudia E Kuehni; Maria L Garrè; Tomas Kepak; Jarmila Kruseova; Jeanette F Winther; Leontien C Kremer; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Wim Je Tissing; Catherine Rechnitzer; Line Kenborg; Henrik Hasle; Desiree Grabow; Ross Parfitt; Harald Binder; Bruce C Carleton; Julianne Byrne; Peter Kaatsch; Antoinette Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; Oliver Zolk; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-03-19
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Managing a Pan-European Consortium on Late Effects among Long-Term Survivors of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer-The PanCareLIFE Project.

Authors:  Peter Kaatsch; Julianne Byrne; Desiree Grabow
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.