| Literature DB >> 32938693 |
Nayeralsadat Fatemi1,2, Najmeh Salehi2, Laura Pignata3,4, Pietro Palumbo5, Maria Vittoria Cubellis6, Fariba Ramazanali7, Pierre Ray8,9, Maryam Varkiani2, Fakhreddin Reyhani-Sabet2, Alireza Biglari1, Angela Sparago3, Basilia Acurzio3,4, Orazio Palumbo5, Massimo Carella5, Andrea Riccio10,4, Mehdi Totonchi11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Triploidy is one of the most common chromosome abnormalities affecting human gestation and accounts for an important fraction of first-trimester miscarriages. Triploidy has been demonstrated in a few cases of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) but its molecular mechanisms are unknown. This study aims to identify the genetic cause of RPL associated with fetus triploidy.Entities:
Keywords: copy-number; reproductive medicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32938693 PMCID: PMC8551973 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-106909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Genet ISSN: 0022-2593 Impact factor: 6.318
Figure 1Pedigree of the family. Two women with RPL history (II-6 and II-7) were born from first-cousins (I-3 and I-4). The probands (II-6 and II-7) and their parents (I-3 and I-4) underwent WES after routine clinical procedure failing to determine the cause of their RPL. Analysis of WES data revealed that II-6 and II-7 were homozygous for the missense variant g.50346749T>A (ChrX, GRCh38/hg38) (SCV000886503, p.V1251D) in the CCNB3 gene. The genotypes of II-5, II-8, II-9, II-10, III-12 and III-15 were determined by Sanger sequencing. RPL, recurrent pregnancy loss; WES, whole-exome sequencing.
Segregation of pericentromeric STSs
| Marker | Chr | Cytoband | Distance from cen (bp) | II-7 | III-12 | III-15 | II-8 | MI | MII |
| D4S405 | 4 | 4p14 | 9 307 605 | bc | bbb* | a | ab | – | III-15 |
| D4S428 | 4 | 4q12 | 2 974 289 | ab |
|
| bb | – | III-12 and III-15 |
| D5S418 | 5 | 5p13.1 | 6 389 874 | bc | NA | a | ad | – | III-15 |
| D5S1969 | 5 | 5q11.2 | 3 837 191 | bc | NA |
| ad | – | III-15 |
| D6S257 | 6 | 6p12.1 | 2 911 729 | bc | NA |
| ad | – | III-15 |
| D8S532 | 8 | 8p11.21 | 3 050 515 | bd | NA | a | ac | – | III-15 |
| D12S1663 | 12 | 12q12 | 6 414 865 | bb |
|
| ac | – | – |
| D13S175 | 13 | 13q12.11 | 1 848 380 | ac | NA |
| bd | – | III-15 |
| D15S128 | 15 | 15q11.2 | 5 130 705 | bc | acc | a | ac | – | III-15 |
| D19S414 | 19 | 19q12 | 4 232 942 | ab |
|
| cd | – | III-12 and III-15 |
| D19S566 | 19 | 19p13.11 | 5 519 801 | bc |
| a | ad | – | III-12 and III-15 |
| DXS991 | X | Xp11.21 | 3 112 973 | aa | NA |
| bb | – | – |
STS alleles are indicated for each individual by a letter with ‘a’ being the largest amplicon. Alleles are underlined if maternal origin is evident. The last two columns indicate if triploidy appears to be originated from meiosis I (MI) or meiosis II (MII).
*Only one type of allele is evident.
mat, maternal; NA, not assessed; STS, sequence-tagged site.
Figure 2The g.50346749T>A (p.V1251D) (ChrX, GRCh38/hg38; SCV000886503) variant of the CCNB3 gene. (A) Schematic representation of the CCNB3 gene derived from UCSC (hg38) showing the sequences coding the destruction box (yellow) and the cyclin box domain (red) in NM_033031. Coding exons are indicated by dark blue boxes and intronic regions by blue lines. The transcription orientation is indicated with arrowheads. The g.50346749T>A is located in exon 10 (NM_033031) in the cyclin box region. (B) Example of Sanger sequencing confirming the segregation of the CCNB3 variant with the phenotype in II-6 and I-4. The variant (T4050A) is in red and showed on the forward strand.
Prediction of V1251 effects on CCNB3 function and structure
| Tool | Prediction | Score/value |
| Function-based predictions | ||
| Sift | Deleterious | 0.023* |
| PolyPhen2 HDIV | Probably damaging | 0.971† |
| Mutation Taster | Disease-causing | 0.954‡ |
| Structure-based predictions | ||
| DynaMut | Destabilising | ΔΔG=−0.947 kcal/mol |
| Normal mode analysis (ENCoM) | Destabilising | ΔΔG=−0.315 kcal/mol |
| Vibrational entropy energy (ENCoM) (mutant vs wild-type) | Increase of molecule flexibility | ΔΔSVib=0.394 kcal mol-1 K-1 |
| mCSM | Destabilising | ΔΔG=−1.500 kcal mol-1 |
| SDM | Destabilising | ΔΔG=−0.910 kcal mol-1 |
| DUET | Destabilising | ΔΔG=−1.315 kcal mol-1 |
*Deleterious:<=0.05; Tolerated:>0.05.
†Probably damaging: ≥0.957; possibly damaging:0.453≤score≤0.956; benign: ≤0.452.
‡Values close to 1 indicate high 'security' of prediction.
Figure 3Effect of the V1251D variant on CCNB3 structure as predicted by in silico studies. (A) Linear representation of CCNB3. The domains destruction box (residues 60–68), and cyclin N (1132–1257) and cyclin C (1259–1375) boxes are depicted. (B–D) Effect of the V1251D variant on CCNB3 structure as predicted by in silico modelling. Close-up of the variant in human wild-type (B), human mutant (C) and mouse wildtype (D) CCNB3. The model of CCNB3 structure is shown as a cartoon, and the human Val/Asp 1251 and Tyr 1192, and mouse Thr 1257 and Tyr 1198 as sticks coloured by atom type. The hydrophobic bonds between Val/Thr and Tyr are indicated by dots. (E–F) Effect of the V1251D variant on CCNB3 structure as predicted by DynaMut. The changes of vibrational entropy (ΔΔS) of each residue in mutant vs wild-type CCNB3 are indicated as coloured protein model (E) and as chart (F). In the model, red represents a gain in flexibility. The figures were produced with the Dynamut webserver. (G–H) Complex between the CCNB3 cyclin box and CDK1 (G) or CDK2 (H) obtained by in silico docking showing Val 1251 close to the interface. CCNB3 is in yellow in (G) and pink in (H), CDK1 is in cyan in (G) and CDK2 is in blue in (H). Atoms at the interface are represented as spheres, Val 1251 is in red and its side chain is represented as sticks.