| Literature DB >> 32937931 |
Adrienne Bushau-Sprinkle1, Michelle T Barati2, Kenneth B Gagnon2, Syed Jalal Khundmiri3, Kathleen Kitterman2, Bradford G Hill4, Amanda Sherwood2, Michael Merchant2, Shesh N Rai5,6, Sudhir Srivastava6,7, Barbara Clark8, Leah Siskind1, Michael Brier1,2, Jessica Hata9,10, Eleanor Lederer2,11.
Abstract
(1) Background: We previously showed Na/H exchange regulatory factor 1 (NHERF1) loss resulted in increased susceptibility to cisplatin nephrotoxicity. NHERF1-deficient cultured proximal tubule cells and proximal tubules from NHERF1 knockout (KO) mice exhibit altered mitochondrial protein expression and poor survival. We hypothesized that NHERF1 loss results in changes in metabolic pathways and/or mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to increased sensitivity to cisplatin nephrotoxicity. (2)Entities:
Keywords: cellular redox state; cisplatin nephrotoxicity; mitochondrial function; oxidative stress
Year: 2020 PMID: 32937931 PMCID: PMC7554817 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9090862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Effect of cisplatin treatment on fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and glucose-6-phosphase enzyme activity in wild-type (WT) and Na/H exchange regulatory factor 1 (NHERF1) knockout (KO) mouse kidneys. Two to 4-month-old male C57BL/6J WT and NHERF1 KO mice were given cisplatin (20 mg/kg dose intraperitoneally (IP)) or vehicle (saline) and sacrificed after 72 h as described in the Methods section. (A) Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase) enzyme activity was determined from the kidney cortex tissue of these mice. Data are means ± SEM (WT vehicle n = 3), (KO vehicle n = 4), (WT cisplatin n = 3), and (KO cisplatin n = 5). *** p = 0.001 cisplatin-treated WT and NHERF1 KO mice compared to vehicle saline controls. (B) Glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) enzyme activity was determined from the kidney cortex tissue of these mice. Data are means ± SEM (WT vehicle n = 3), (KO vehicle n = 4), (WT cisplatin n = 3), and (KO cisplatin n = 5). *** p < 0.001 cisplatin-treated WT and NHERF1 KO mice compared to vehicle saline controls.
Figure 2Lactate dehydrogenase and malate dehydrogenase enzyme activity in WT and NHERF1 KO mouse kidneys. Two to 4-month-old male C57BL/6J WT and NHERF1 KO mice were given cisplatin (20 mg/kg dose IP) or vehicle (saline) and sacrificed after 72 h as described in the Methods section. (A) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) enzyme activity was determined from kidney cortex tissue of these mice. Data are mean ± SEM (WT vehicle n = 3), (KO vehicle n = 4), (WT cisplatin n = 3), and (NHERF1 KO cisplatin n = 5). No significant differences were recorded. (B) Malate dehydrogenase (MDH) enzyme activity was determined from the kidney cortex tissue of these mice. Data are mean ± SEM (WT vehicle n = 3), (KO vehicle n = 4), (WT cisplatin n = 3), (NHERF1 KO cisplatin n = 5). No significant differences were reported.
Figure 3Effect of NHERF1 loss and cisplatin treatment on malic enzyme and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme activity in WT and NHERF1 KO mouse kidneys. Two to 4-month-old male C57BL/6J WT and NHERF1 KO mice were given cisplatin (20 mg/kg dose IP) or vehicle (saline) and sacrificed after 72 h as described in the Methods section. (A) Malic enzyme (ME) activity was determined from the kidney cortex tissue of these mice. Data are mean ± SEM (WT vehicle n = 3), (KO vehicle n = 4), (WT cisplatin n = 3), and (KO cisplatin n = 5). ** p = 0.0065. Vehicle-treated NHERF1 KO mice compared to WT vehicle controls; *** p = 0.0005 interaction of cisplatin-treated NHERF1 KO mice to cisplatin-treated WT mice. (B) G6PD enzyme activity was determined from the kidney cortex tissue of these mice. Data are mean ± SEM (WT vehicle n = 3), (KO vehicle n = 4), (WT cisplatin n = 3), and (KO cisplatin n = 5). ** p = 0.0033 vehicle-treated NHERF1 KO mice compared to WT vehicle controls; ** p = 0.00029 interaction of cisplatin-treated NHERF1 KO mice to cisplatin-treated WT mice.
Figure 4ATP content of WT and NHERF1 KO mouse kidneys.LC-MS was utilized to evaluate the amount of ATP in these tissues as described in the Methods section. Data are means ± SEM (WT n = 5) and (KO n = 5). No significant differences were reported in these kidneys.
Figure 5Electron microscopy of mitochondria in WT and NHERF1 KO proximal tubules.
Figure 6Evaluation of mitochondrial number and area of WT and NHERF1 KO proximal tubules. (A) Number of mitochondria were counted in random 4× visual fields with the highest density of mitochondria. Data are means ± SEM (WT n = 6) and (NHERF1 KO n = 5). The mitochondria number of NHERF1 KO proximal tubules was insignificant when compared to WT. (B) Mitochondria area was calculated using electron microscopy (EM) images and Image J. Data are means ± SEM (WT n = 6) and (NHERF1 KO n = 5). Mitochondria area of NHERF1 KO proximal tubules were insignificant when compared to WT.
Figure 7Mitochondrial function in isolated mitochondria of WT and NHERF1 KO kidneys. Mitochondria from two to 4-month-old male WT and NHERF1 KO mice were isolated and analyzed via the Seahorse XF24 for oxidative capacity as described in the Methods section. (A) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was recorded after the addition of both substrates (succinate/rotenone/ADP) and inhibitors (oligomycin and antimycin A) [(WT n = 6) and (NHERF1 KO n = 6)]. (B) State 3 and state 4 were calculated using the recorded OCRs of WT and NHERF1 KO mitochondria. Data are mean ± SD [(WT n = 6) and (NHERF1 KO n = 6)]. State 3 and state 4 respiration were considered insignificant between WT and NHERF1 KO mouse kidney mitochondria. (C) Respiratory control ratio (RCR) (state 3/state 4) was calculated between WT and NHERF1 KO kidney mitochondria. Data are represented as state 3/state 4 ratio [(WT n = 6) and (NHERF1 n = 6)]. RCR was insignificant between WT and NHERF1 KO mouse kidney mitochondria.