Literature DB >> 32937602

IPEM Topical Report: An evidence and risk assessment based analysis of the efficacy of quality assurance tests on fluoroscopy units-part II; image quality.

Dan Shaw1, Mark Worrall2, Chris Baker3, Paul Charnock4, Jason Fazakerley4, Ian Honey5, Gareth Iball6, Manthos Koutalonis7, Mandy Price8, Caroline Renaud9, Amy Rose8, Tim Wood10.   

Abstract

This work aims to assess the efficacy of x-ray quality assurance tests undertaken on fluoroscopy units in the UK. Information was gathered on the results of image quality tests recommended by the reports of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, and those additionally undertaken by medical physics departments. The assessment of efficacy considers the frequency with which a test result breaches the remedial level or other relevant threshold where applicable. The third quartile of those results exceeding the remedial level or threshold is used to estimate the severity of such a breach in terms of potential impact on patient dose and image quality. A risk assessment approach is then used to recommend to what degree, if any, the test should be included in an on-going test regimen. Data was analysed from 469 testing sessions to 337 unique fluoroscopy units throughout the UK. Across all tests, the rate with which the remedial level was exceeded varied from 0-10.6%, with severity ranging from little or none to major degradation to image quality or significant increase on population dose. Where possible, the data has also been used to produce representative ranges for the results of image quality tests. These could be useful as an up to date comparator for those sites considering the purchase of or commissioning new equipment. Overall the results indicate a wide range for the efficacy of those tests undertaken at present; this can be used to review local test protocols and to inform future changes to national guidance in the UK. The results also highlight some tests where measurement technique varies significantly throughout the UK, making any valid comparison difficult. This may indicate a need for further guidance on how best to undertake these tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32937602     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb92f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  1 in total

1.  Extended detail contrasts for TO.10 use on flat panel detector fluoroscopy systems.

Authors:  Dean McCarthy; Patrick Kenny
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.629

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.