Literature DB >> 32937174

Ambient air pollution and risk of pregnancy loss among women undergoing assisted reproduction.

Audrey J Gaskins1, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón2, Paige L Williams3, Jorge E Chavarro4, Joel D Schwartz5, Itai Kloog6, Irene Souter7, Russ Hauser8, Francine Laden9.   

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that air pollution increases pregnancy loss; however, most previous studies have focused on case identification from medical records, which may underrepresent early pregnancy losses. Our objective was to investigate the association between acute and chronic exposure to ambient air pollution and time to pregnancy loss among women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART) who are closely followed throughout early pregnancy. We included 275 women (345 human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-confirmed pregnancies) undergoing ART at a New England academic fertility center. We estimated daily nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), fine particulate matter <2.5 μm (PM2.5), and black carbon (BC) exposures using validated spatiotemporal models estimated from first positive hCG test until day of failure or live birth. Air pollution exposures were averaged over the past week and the whole pregnancy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazards ratio (HR) for pregnancy loss for an interquartile range (IQR) increase in pollutant exposure. We tested for violation of proportional hazards by considering an interaction between time (in days) since positive hCG (<30 days vs. ≥30 days) and air pollution. The incidence of pregnancy loss was 29 per 100 confirmed pregnancies (n = 99). Among pregnancies not resulting in live birth, the median (IQR) time to loss was 21 (11, 30) days following positive hCG. Average past week exposures to NO2, O3, PM2.5, and BC were not associated with time to pregnancy loss. Exposure throughout pregnancy to NO2 was not associated with pregnancy loss; however, there was a statistically significant interaction with time (p-for-interaction<0.001). Specifically, an IQR increase in exposure to NO2 was positively associated with pregnancy loss after 30 days (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.58), but not in the first 30 days after positive hCG (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.20). Overall pregnancy exposure to O3, PM2.5, and BC were not associated with pregnancy loss regardless of timing. Models evaluating joint effects of all pollutants yielded similar findings. In conclusion, acute and chronic exposure to NO2, O3, PM2.5, and BC were not associated with risk of pregnancy loss; however, higher exposure to NO2 throughout pregnancy was associated with increased risk of loss 30 days after positive hCG. In this cohort, later pregnancy losses appeared more susceptible to the detrimental effects of air pollution exposure.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Assisted reproduction; In vitro fertilization; Miscarriage; Pregnancy loss

Year:  2020        PMID: 32937174      PMCID: PMC7658021          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  42 in total

Review 1.  Air pollution and birth outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Prakesh S Shah; Taiba Balkhair
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 2.  Infertility and miscarriage: common pathways in manifestation and management.

Authors:  Angena Agenor; Sohinee Bhattacharya
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-04

3.  Methods of covariate selection: directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Weng; Ya-Hui Hsueh; Locksley L McV Messam; Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Traffic-related Air Pollution and Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Raanan Raz; Ander Wilson; Ronen Fluss; Ronit Nirel; David M Broday; Michele R Hacker; Thomas F McElrath; Itamar Grotto; Petros Koutrakis; Marc G Weisskopf
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Bryan Lau; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Daily ambient NO2 concentration predictions using satellite ozone monitoring instrument NO2 data and land use regression.

Authors:  Hyung Joo Lee; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Maternal age, history of miscarriage, and embryonic/fetal size are associated with cytogenetic results of spontaneous early miscarriages.

Authors:  Nobuaki Ozawa; Kohei Ogawa; Aiko Sasaki; Mari Mitsui; Seiji Wada; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Traffic air pollution and oxidatively generated DNA damage: can urinary 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2-deoxiguanosine be considered a good biomarker? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Lettieri Barbato; Gianfranco Tomei; Francesco Tomei; Angela Sancini
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Acute exposure to diesel exhaust impairs nitric oxide-mediated endothelial vasomotor function by increasing endothelial oxidative stress.

Authors:  Aurélien Wauters; Céline Dreyfuss; Stéphanie Pochet; Patrick Hendrick; Guy Berkenboom; Philippe van de Borne; Jean-François Argacha
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Ambient air pollution and the risk of pregnancy loss: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sandie Ha; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis; Carrie Nobles; Indulaxmi Seeni; Seth Sherman; Pauline Mendola
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Periconception air pollution, metabolomic biomarkers, and fertility among women undergoing assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Audrey J Gaskins; Ziyin Tang; Robert B Hood; Jennifer Ford; Joel D Schwartz; Dean P Jones; Francine Laden; Donghai Liang
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 9.621

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.