Jingwen Yao1,2,3, Chencai Wang1,2, Benjamin M Ellingson1,2,3,4. 1. UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3. Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of phosphate on amine, amide, and hydroxyl CEST contrast using Bloch-McConnell simulations applied to physical phantom data. METHODS: Phantom solutions of 4 representative metabolites with exchangeable protons-glycine (α-amine protons), Cr (η-amine protons), egg white protein (amide protons), and glucose (hydroxyl protons)-were prepared at different pH levels (5.6 to 8.9) and phosphate concentrations (5 to 80 mM). CEST images of the phantom were collected with CEST-EPI sequence at 3 tesla. The CEST data were then fitted to full Bloch-McConnell equation simulations to estimate the exchange rate constants. With the fitted parameters, simulations were performed to evaluate the intracellular and extracellular contributions of CEST signals in normal brain tissue and brain tumors, as well as in dynamic glucose-enhanced experiments. RESULTS: The exchange rates of α-amine and hydroxyl protons were found to be highly dependent on both pH and phosphate concentrations, whereas the exchange rates of η-amine and amide protons were pH-dependent, albeit not catalyzed by phosphate. With phosphate being predominantly intracellular, CEST contrast of α-amine exhibited a higher sensitivity to changes in the extracellular microenvironment. Simulations of dynamic glucose-enhanced signals demonstrated that the contrast between normal and tumor tissue was mostly due to the extracellular CEST effect. CONCLUSION: The proton exchange rates in some metabolites can be greatly catalyzed by the presence of phosphate at physiological concentrations, which substantially alters the CEST contrast. Catalytic agents should be considered as confounding factors in future CEST-MRI research. This new dimension may also benefit the development of novel phosphate-sensitive imaging methods.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of phosphate on amine, amide, and hydroxyl CEST contrast using Bloch-McConnell simulations applied to physical phantom data. METHODS: Phantom solutions of 4 representative metabolites with exchangeable protons-glycine (α-amine protons), Cr (η-amine protons), egg white protein (amide protons), and glucose (hydroxyl protons)-were prepared at different pH levels (5.6 to 8.9) and phosphate concentrations (5 to 80 mM). CEST images of the phantom were collected with CEST-EPI sequence at 3 tesla. The CEST data were then fitted to full Bloch-McConnell equation simulations to estimate the exchange rate constants. With the fitted parameters, simulations were performed to evaluate the intracellular and extracellular contributions of CEST signals in normal brain tissue and brain tumors, as well as in dynamic glucose-enhanced experiments. RESULTS: The exchange rates of α-amine and hydroxyl protons were found to be highly dependent on both pH and phosphate concentrations, whereas the exchange rates of η-amine and amide protons were pH-dependent, albeit not catalyzed by phosphate. With phosphate being predominantly intracellular, CEST contrast of α-amine exhibited a higher sensitivity to changes in the extracellular microenvironment. Simulations of dynamic glucose-enhanced signals demonstrated that the contrast between normal and tumor tissue was mostly due to the extracellular CEST effect. CONCLUSION: The proton exchange rates in some metabolites can be greatly catalyzed by the presence of phosphate at physiological concentrations, which substantially alters the CEST contrast. Catalytic agents should be considered as confounding factors in future CEST-MRI research. This new dimension may also benefit the development of novel phosphate-sensitive imaging methods.
Authors: Markus Wyss; Olivier Braissant; Ivo Pischel; Gajja S Salomons; Andreas Schulze; Sylvia Stockler; Theo Wallimann Journal: Subcell Biochem Date: 2007
Authors: Robert J Harris; Jingwen Yao; Ararat Chakhoyan; Catalina Raymond; Kevin Leu; Linda M Liau; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Albert Lai; Noriko Salamon; Whitney B Pope; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Robert J Harris; Timothy F Cloughesy; Linda M Liau; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Albert Lai; Whitney B Pope; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Xiang Xu; Kannie W Y Chan; Linda Knutsson; Dmitri Artemov; Jiadi Xu; Guanshu Liu; Yoshinori Kato; Bachchu Lal; John Laterra; Michael T McMahon; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 4.668