Literature DB >> 32936471

Assessing the dilution effect of specimen pooling on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests.

Allen C Bateman1, Shanna Mueller1, Kyley Guenther1, Peter Shult1.   

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to an unprecedented demand for diagnostic tests. Many studies have modeled the efficiency gains of specimen pooling, but few have systematically evaluated the dilution effect of pooling on the sensitivity of tests. Using the frequency distribution of cycle threshold (Ct ) values of our first 838 SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens, we modeled 100 specimens on the same frequency distribution. Given this distribution, we then tested dilutions of 1:5, 1:10, and 1:50 to find the percentage of specimens positive at each Ct value with each pool size. Using the frequency distribution and the percentage of specimens positive at each Ct value, we estimate that pools of 5 lead to 93% sensitivity, pools of 10 lead to 91% sensitivity, and pools of 50 lead to 81% sensitivity. Pools of 5 and 10 lead to some specimens with Ct values of ≥32 becoming negative, while pools of 50 lead to some specimens with Ct values of ≥28 becoming negative. These sensitivity estimates can inform laboratories seeking to implement pooling approaches as they seek to balance test efficiency with sensitivity.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SARS-CoV-2; dilution; pooling; sensitivity

Year:  2020        PMID: 32936471     DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


  10 in total

1.  Simulation of group testing scenarios can boost COVID-19 screening power.

Authors:  Vinicius Henrique da Silva; Carolina Purcell Goes; Priscila Anchieta Trevisoli; Raquel Lello; Luan Gaspar Clemente; Talita Bonato de Almeida; Juliana Petrini; Luiz Lehmann Coutinho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  The Successes and Challenges of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer Dien Bard; N Esther Babady
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  A Regional Pooling Intervention in a High-Throughput COVID-19 Diagnostic Laboratory to Enhance Throughput, Save Resources and Time Over a Period of 6 Months.

Authors:  Prerna Mandhan; Mansi Sharma; Sushmita Pandey; Neha Chandel; Nidhi Chourasia; Amit Moun; Divyani Sharma; Rubee Sukar; Niyati Singh; Shubhangi Mathur; Aarti Kotnala; Neetu Negi; Ashish Gupta; Anuj Kumar; R Suresh Kumar; Pramod Kumar; Shalini Singh
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Optimal uses of pooled testing for COVID-19 incorporating imperfect test performance and pool dilution effect: An application to congregate settings in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Roch A Nianogo; I Obi Emeruwa; Prabhu Gounder; Vladimir Manuel; Nathaniel W Anderson; Tony Kuo; Moira Inkelas; Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 20.693

5.  Sample pooling as a strategy for community monitoring for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Rafal Sawicki; Izabela Korona-Glowniak; Anastazja Boguszewska; Agnieszka Stec; Malgorzata Polz-Dacewicz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Testing at scale during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Tim R Mercer; Marc Salit
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 59.581

7.  Pooled testing efficiency increases with test frequency.

Authors:  Ned Augenblick; Jonathan Kolstad; Ziad Obermeyer; Ao Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Diagnostic performance of RT-PCR-based sample pooling strategy for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Miguel Hueda-Zavaleta; Cesar Copaja-Corzo; Vicente A Benites-Zapata; Pedro Cardenas-Rueda; Jorge L Maguiña; Alfonso J Rodríguez-Morales
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.944

9.  Pooled testing of traced contacts under superspreading dynamics.

Authors:  Stratis Tsirtsis; Abir De; Lars Lorch; Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  SARS-CoV-2 surveillance by RT-qPCR-based pool testing of saliva swabs (lollipop method) at primary and special schools-A pilot study on feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  Anika Kästner; Petra Lücker; Martina Sombetzki; Manja Ehmke; Nicole Koslowski; Swantje Mittmann; Arne Hannich; Antje Schwarz; Kristian Meinck; Lena Schmeyers; Katrin Schmidt; Emil C Reisinger; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.