| Literature DB >> 32935749 |
Ywlliane da Silva Rodrigues Meurer1,2, Ramayana Morais de Medeiros Brito3, Valeria Palheta da Silva2, Joelma Maria de Araujo Andade3, Sarah Sophia Guedes Linhares2, Antonio Pereira Junior4, Valter Ferreira de Andrade-Neto3, Andrea Lima de Sá3, Claudio Bruno Silva de Oliveira3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Behavioral and neurochemical alterations associated with toxoplasmosis may be influenced by the persistence of tissue cysts and activation of an immune response in the brain of Toxoplasma gondii-infected hosts. The cerebral extracellular matrix is organised as perineuronal nets (PNNs) that are both released and ensheath by some neurons and glial cells. There is evidences to suggest that PNNs impairment is a pathophysiological mechanism associated with neuropsychiatric conditions. However, there is a lack of information regarding the impact of parasitic infections on the PNNs integrity and how this could affect the host's behavior.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32935749 PMCID: PMC7491278 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760200007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Fig. 1:perineuronal nets (PNN+) Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA)-labelled cells are strong reduced in different areas in brain of Toxoplasma gondii-infected mice. (A) Coronal slices were collected in the prefrontal area, somatosensory area (S1), primary and secondary cortices (M1 and M2, respectively); (B) T. gondii cysts quantification of the brain regions analysed. (C) Representative photomicrographs of PNN+ WFA-labelled cells in brain of control (C1, C2) and ME-49 (C3, C4) groups. Scale Bar = 250 µm (2.3x; low magnification) and 5 µm (100x; high manification). Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Fig. 2:effects of Toxoplasma gondii infection on number of Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA)+-labelled cells in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC; 2A), primary somatosensory cortex (S1; 2B), primary motor cortex (M1; 2C) and secondary motor cortex (M2; 2D). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *: p < 0.05 vs. control group.
Fig. 3:the open-field apparatus was used to assess locomotor activity. We analysed the distance travelled (A), average speed developed (B), and the time spent in the external (C) and in the centre zone (D) of the open field were recorded.by control and ME-49 infected mice during 10 minutes. Results were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of total distance travelled in meters and average speed in meters per second. *: p < 0.05 vs. control group.