Literature DB >> 32935548

Rapid Electronic Capturing of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Older Adults With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Feasibility Study.

Jennifer Gabbard1,2, Christopher J McLouth3, Gretchen Brenes1, Sophie Claudel1, Samantha Ongchuan1, John Burkart4, Nicholas Pajewski2,5, Kathryn E Callahan1,2, Jeff D Williamson1,2, Mariana Murea4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have a high burden of physical and psychological symptoms. Many remain unrecognized for long periods of time, particularly in older adults. The best strategy to monitor patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has not been identified.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of implementing an iPad-based symptom assessment tool in older adults with ESRD on hemodialysis (HD).
METHODS: We designed an iPad application-delivery system for collecting electronic PROMs (ePROMs). Patient's ≥60 years of age with ESRD on HD were recruited from a single outpatient dialysis unit. Feasibility was evaluated based on recruitment, retention, and the system usability score (SUS). Assessments were completed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after enrollment. ANOVA was used to assess longitudinal symptom variability.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (49% recruitment rate) were enrolled, with an 82% retention at 6 months. Mean age was 69.4 years (SD 6.6), 63.6% were female, and 81.8% were African American. Participants reported minimal difficulty in using the app, with an overall SUS score of 77.6. There were no significant relationships between demographic characteristics (age, race, or education) and SUS. Baseline SF-12 physical score and SF-12 mental score were 40.4 (SD 9.1) and 33.9 (SD 6.7), respectively. No significant changes were seen in longitudinal ePROMs of pain, depression, or anxiety; but was seen in the dialysis symptom index.
CONCLUSION: In older patients with ESRD, collection of iPad-based ePROMs is feasible. This process can overcome inefficiencies associated with paper questionnaires and enable systematic monitoring of symptom burden.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical decision support system; mobile application; older adults; palliative medicine; patient reported outcome measures; renal dialysis; symptom burden

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32935548      PMCID: PMC8216503          DOI: 10.1177/1049909120954805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.090


  39 in total

1.  Impact of a palliative care consult service.

Authors:  Kevin Whitford; Nilay D Shah; James Moriarty; Megan Branda; Bjoerg Thorsteinsdottir
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Can palliative home care reduce 30-day readmissions? Results of a propensity score matched cohort study.

Authors:  Anjana Ranganathan; Meredith Dougherty; David Waite; David Casarett
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Management of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Derek Kyte; Paul Cockwell; Tom Marshall; Mary Dutton; Natalie Walmsley-Allen; Anita Slade; Christel McMullan; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Interplay of anxiety and depression with quality of life in endstage renal disease.

Authors:  Andrew T Olagunju; Elizabeth A Campbell; Joseph D Adeyemi
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.386

Review 5.  The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 6.  Early palliative care and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: potential mechanisms of prolonged survival.

Authors:  Kelly E Irwin; Joseph A Greer; Jude Khatib; Jennifer S Temel; William F Pirl
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.444

Review 7.  Dialysis discontinuation: quo vadis?

Authors:  Fliss Murtagh; Lewis M Cohen; Michael J Germain
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.620

Review 8.  Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; Inês Bonacho Dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby; Oscar Bortolami; Laura Flight; Daniel Hind; Richard M Jacques; Christopher Knox; Ben Nadin; Joanne Rothwell; Michael Surtees; Steven A Julious
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Back to the future - feasibility of recruitment and retention to patient education and telephone follow-up after hip fracture: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dolores P Langford; Lena Fleig; Kristin C Brown; Nancy J Cho; Maeve Frost; Monique Ledoyen; Jayne Lehn; Kostas Panagiotopoulos; Nina Sharpe; Maureen C Ashe
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Requirements for the collection of electronic PROMS either "in clinic" or "at home" as part of the PROMs, PREMs and Effectiveness Programme (PPEP) in Wales: a feasibility study using a generic PROM tool.

Authors:  Susan O'Connell; Robert Palmer; Kathleen Withers; Neeleem Saha; Sarah Puntoni; Grace Carolan-Rees
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-07-04
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States.

Authors:  Colby J Hyland; Ruby Guo; Ravi Dhawan; Manraj N Kaur; Paul A Bain; Maria O Edelen; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-03-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.