BACKGROUND: T-cell immunity is affected in end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, whether this happens at pre- or post-dialysis stage and what is the impact of different renal replacement methods, remains unclear. We investigated the alterations of T-cell subtypes in patients at pre-dialysis ESRD and their further changes during dialysis. METHODS: CD4+, CD8+, CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null T-cells were analysed in 40 ESRD patients at two different time points, (a) the day started on dialysis (ESRD-T0) and (b) 6 months later (ESRD-T6), while being on haemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Twenty-five age matched healthy volunteers served as controls. RESULTS: CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were significantly reduced in ESRD-T0 patients compared to controls, 604 (105-3551) vs 943 (584-1867)μ/L, P = .001, and 352 (103-1561) vs 422.4 (263-1453)μ/L, P = .05, respectively. However, proportions of CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null cells were significantly increased, 6.4 (0.3-30)% vs 2.7 (0.1-7.8)%, P = .04 and 58.2 (12.8-85.4)% vs 39 (7.8-57.1)%, P = .01, respectively. Proportion of CD4 + CD28null cells showed significant correlation with serum CRP (r = .4, P = .04) and albumin levels (r = -.5, P = .007) in ERSD patients. ESRD-T0 patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) had increased CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null proportions, 8.6 (1-30)% vs 2.1 (0.1-19.8)%, P = .04 and 62.5 (12.8-85.4)% vs 45.5 (5.7-73.7)%, P = .02, respectively, compared to those without. Six months later, both CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null T-cells were increased in HD compared to CAPD patients, by +110.11 (-27.1 to 311.4)% vs -28.1 (-100 to 30)%, P = .003 and +55.23 (-29.06 to 197.93)% vs -8.34 (-54.99 to 66.72)%, P = .05, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null T-cells are increased at pre-dialysis ESRD, and correlate with chronic inflammatory markers and the presence of CVD. Dialysis methods seem to have different impact on these subpopulations.
BACKGROUND: T-cell immunity is affected in end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, whether this happens at pre- or post-dialysis stage and what is the impact of different renal replacement methods, remains unclear. We investigated the alterations of T-cell subtypes in patients at pre-dialysis ESRD and their further changes during dialysis. METHODS:CD4+, CD8+, CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null T-cells were analysed in 40 ESRDpatients at two different time points, (a) the day started on dialysis (ESRD-T0) and (b) 6 months later (ESRD-T6), while being on haemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Twenty-five age matched healthy volunteers served as controls. RESULTS:CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were significantly reduced in ESRD-T0 patients compared to controls, 604 (105-3551) vs 943 (584-1867)μ/L, P = .001, and 352 (103-1561) vs 422.4 (263-1453)μ/L, P = .05, respectively. However, proportions of CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null cells were significantly increased, 6.4 (0.3-30)% vs 2.7 (0.1-7.8)%, P = .04 and 58.2 (12.8-85.4)% vs 39 (7.8-57.1)%, P = .01, respectively. Proportion of CD4 + CD28null cells showed significant correlation with serum CRP (r = .4, P = .04) and albumin levels (r = -.5, P = .007) in ERSD patients. ESRD-T0 patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) had increased CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null proportions, 8.6 (1-30)% vs 2.1 (0.1-19.8)%, P = .04 and 62.5 (12.8-85.4)% vs 45.5 (5.7-73.7)%, P = .02, respectively, compared to those without. Six months later, both CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null T-cells were increased in HD compared to CAPD patients, by +110.11 (-27.1 to 311.4)% vs -28.1 (-100 to 30)%, P = .003 and +55.23 (-29.06 to 197.93)% vs -8.34 (-54.99 to 66.72)%, P = .05, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:CD4 + CD28null and CD8 + CD28null T-cells are increased at pre-dialysis ESRD, and correlate with chronic inflammatory markers and the presence of CVD. Dialysis methods seem to have different impact on these subpopulations.
Authors: Federico Alejandro Di Lello; Alfredo Pedro Martínez; Diego Martín Flichman Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2022-08-21 Impact factor: 5.374