Feng Feng1, Xuehui Cao2, Xueqing Liu1, Jianzhang Qin1, Shubin Zhang1, Qiusheng Li1, Jianhua Liu3. 1. Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. 2. Pediatric Surgery Department, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. 3. Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. dr.ljh@outlook.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) has achieved positive results in treating various abdominal cancers but infrequently reported in resectable pancreatic head cancer. This study was designed to explore the safety and efficacy of pancreaticoduodenectomy plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (PD + IPHP) in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Data of pancreatic cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were retrospectively analyzed, including PD + IPHP (n = 28) and PD group (n = 29). IPHP was performed during surgery, on postoperative day (POD) 2, and POD 4 with normal saline as the perfusion solution. Complications and overall survival of these patients were observed and recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of major postoperative complications between PD + IPHP group and PD group. The median overall survival (OS) time of the PD + IPHP group was 19.0 months, the 1-year survival rate was 82.35%, and the 2-year survival rate was 49.41%. The median OS time of the PD group was 13.0 months, the 1-year survival rate was 51.00%, and the 2-year survival rate was 27.33% (Log-rank, P = 0.030; Breslow, P = 0.039). Cox proportional risk model showed that IPHP was an independent factor to improve survival outcomes of these patients (hazard ratio = 0.363, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.94; P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion significantly improves the survival outcomes of pancreatic head cancer patients undergoing PD and does not bring extra risks of complications.
BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) has achieved positive results in treating various abdominal cancers but infrequently reported in resectable pancreatic head cancer. This study was designed to explore the safety and efficacy of pancreaticoduodenectomy plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (PD + IPHP) in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Data of pancreatic cancerpatients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were retrospectively analyzed, including PD + IPHP (n = 28) and PD group (n = 29). IPHP was performed during surgery, on postoperative day (POD) 2, and POD 4 with normal saline as the perfusion solution. Complications and overall survival of these patients were observed and recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of major postoperative complications between PD + IPHP group and PD group. The median overall survival (OS) time of the PD + IPHP group was 19.0 months, the 1-year survival rate was 82.35%, and the 2-year survival rate was 49.41%. The median OS time of the PD group was 13.0 months, the 1-year survival rate was 51.00%, and the 2-year survival rate was 27.33% (Log-rank, P = 0.030; Breslow, P = 0.039). Cox proportional risk model showed that IPHP was an independent factor to improve survival outcomes of these patients (hazard ratio = 0.363, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.94; P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion significantly improves the survival outcomes of pancreatic head cancerpatients undergoing PD and does not bring extra risks of complications.