Literature DB >> 32934747

Significance of age-associated quality of life in patients with stage IV breast cancer who underwent endocrine therapy in Japan.

Koji Takada1, Shinichiro Kashiwagi1, Yuka Asano1, Wataru Goto1, Tamami Morisaki1, Katsuyuki Takahashi2, Masatsune Shibutani3, Ryosuke Amano4, Tsutomu Takashima1, Shuhei Tomita2, Kosei Hirakawa1,3, Masaichi Ohira1,3.   

Abstract

Currently, when determining treatment regimens, there is an emphasis on the quality of life (QOL), in addition to treatment efficacy. Especially in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with distant metastases, unless death is imminent, a common first-line treatment is endocrine therapy, which has fewer side effects. In the present study, the differences in QOL were evaluated based on the age and prognostic indicators of 46 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with distant metastases (stage IV), who received first-line endocrine therapy at the Osaka City University Hospital (Osaka, Japan) between November 2007 and November 2016. QOL score before and after endocrine therapy was retrospectively analyzed, using the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-Cancer Drugs-Breast (QOL-ACD-B). There was no significant association between age and any of the clinicopathological features investigated. However, the QOL score of the elderly patient group was significantly higher compared with that of the younger group in the 'Satisfaction with treatment and coping with disease' subcategory (P=0.008). The QOL score of the younger age group in the same subcategory was significantly improved by the treatment (P=0.013). The patients that had an increased overall QOL score 3 months after treatment initiation had a significant extension of progression-free survival (PFS) rate compared to the patients with decreased or no change in QOL (P=0.032). In conclusion, psychological stress was more prominent in younger patients with stage IV breast cancer treated with hormonal therapy compared with elderly patients. Importantly, improving QOL within the 3 months after treatment initiation could lead to longer PFS rate.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distant metastases; endocrine therapy; hormone receptor-positive breast cancer; prognosis; quality of life

Year:  2020        PMID: 32934747      PMCID: PMC7471707          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.12041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  31 in total

1.  The World Health Organisation needs to reconsider its definition of health.

Authors:  R Saracci
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-05-10

2.  Quality of life scores: an independent prognostic variable in a general population of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  J Dancey; B Zee; D Osoba; M Whitehead; F Lu; L Kaizer; J Latreille; J L Pater
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The prognostic value of quality-of-life scores: preliminary results of an analysis of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  K Shimozuma; H Sonoo; K Ichihara; K Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Prognostic factors for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer, limited disease. The importance of patients' subjective experience of disease and psychosocial well-being.

Authors:  S Kaasa; A Mastekaasa; E Lund
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK).

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube; Massimo Gion; Gary M Clark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Clinical epidemiology of breast cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  W J Louwman; J C M Vulto; R H A Verhoeven; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; J W W Coebergh; A C Voogd
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions: a comparative study from Jerusalem and Berlin.

Authors:  M Levy; H Kewitz; W Altwein; J Hillebrand; M Eliakim
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Predisposing factors in adverse reactions to drugs.

Authors:  N Hurwitz
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-03-01

10.  Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) among Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy in Hospital Melaka: Single Centre Experience

Authors:  Dang Chee Chean; Wong Kuo Zang; Michelle Lim; Nooraziah Zulkefle
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.