| Literature DB >> 32934236 |
Yifan Dong1, Vasileios C Nikolis2,3, Felix Talnack4, Yi-Chun Chin5, Johannes Benduhn2, Giacomo Londi6, Jonas Kublitski2, Xijia Zheng1, Stefan C B Mannsfeld4, Donato Spoltore2, Luca Muccioli7, Jing Li8, Xavier Blase8, David Beljonne6, Ji-Seon Kim9, Artem A Bakulin1, Gabriele D'Avino10, James R Durrant11,12, Koen Vandewal13.
Abstract
Organic solar cells usually utilise a heterojunction between electron-donating (D) and electron-accepting (A) materials to split excitons into charges. However, the use of D-A blends intrinsically limits the photovoltage and introduces morphological instability. Here, we demonstrate that polycrystalline films of chemically identical molecules offer a promising alternative and show that photoexcitation of α-sexithiophene (α-6T) films results in efficient charge generation. This leads to α-6T based homojunction organic solar cells with an external quantum efficiency reaching up to 44% and an open-circuit voltage of 1.61 V. Morphological, photoemission, and modelling studies show that boundaries between α-6T crystalline domains with different orientations generate an electrostatic landscape with an interfacial energy offset of 0.4 eV, which promotes the formation of hybridised exciton/charge-transfer states at the interface, dissociating efficiently into free charges. Our findings open new avenues for organic solar cell design where material energetics are tuned through molecular electrostatic engineering and mesoscale structural control.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32934236 PMCID: PMC7494863 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18439-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Organic solar cells based on α-6T and various buffer layers.
a Device architecture of the investigated devices. BPhen and an additional buffer layer (BL) are used between α-6T and the top contact (Ag). The numbers in the parentheses denote the layer thickness in nanometre. b External quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra and c current–voltage characteristic curves of solar cells employing α-6T and various BL materials.
Photovoltaic parameters of organic solar cells based on α-6T with various buffer layers.
| Device structure | FF (%) | PCE (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITO/α-6T/BPhen/Ag | 1.25 | 1.4 | 41.4 | 0.7 |
| ITO/α-6T/Rubrene/BPhen/Ag | 1.61 | 3.6 | 50.2 | 2.9 |
| ITO/α-6T/C545T/BPhen/Ag | 1.46 | 3.8 | 34.7 | 1.9 |
| ITO/α-6T/DBzA/BPhen/Ag | 1.57 | 3.3 | 39.9 | 2.1 |
| ITO/α-6T/TCTA/BPhen/Ag | 1.57 | 3.3 | 39.4 | 2.1 |
| ITO/α-6T/TPBA/BPhen/Ag | 1.61 | 3.6 | 47.0 | 2.8 |
| ITO/α-6T/TBPe/BPhen/Ag | 1.41 | 3.0 | 42.5 | 1.8 |
| ITO/α-6T/TPBI/BPhen/Ag | 1.50 | 3.2 | 33.3 | 1.6 |
Fig. 2Transient absorption (TA) characterisation for the pristine α-6T thin film.
a TA spectra for pristine α-6T thin film employing a pump wavelength of 450 nm; b TA kinetics at 593 nm (blue) and 780 nm (orange) representing stimulated emission (SE) and photoinduced absorption (PIA) signals, respectively, where the lifetimes of exciton decay and charge generation can be extracted from individual dynamics. The solid lines are exponential fitting for the raw data (dots). Low (5 µJ cm−2) excitation fluences were used to minimise exciton–exciton annihilation and bimolecular recombination processes (see Supplementary Figs. 6 and 8 for details).
Fig. 3Morphological and spectroscopic characterisation for the orientation of α-6T thin films.
a Absorbance spectra for α-6T thin films with different molecular orientations where the lying molecules show the highest absorbance and the mixed orientation film lies in between the lying and standing samples. b Photoluminescence (PL) spectra normalised with the absorbance at the excitation wavelength of 450 nm for α-6T thin films with different molecular orientations where the PL quenching is observed in the mixed molecules. c Time-correlated single photon counting for α-6T thin films with different molecular orientations (standing, mixed and lying) revealing a faster PL decay in the presence of both standing and lying orientations. The grey dots indicate the prompt decay (instrument response function), which in the case of the mixed and lying orientations induces an artefact at 1.3 ns. d–f Grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) diffraction images showing that the molecular orientation of α-6T thin films can be tuned with specific processing conditions. The peaks indicated by red and blue circles originate from crystallites with standing and lying molecules, respectively. g–i, schematic morphology for α-6T thin films with different molecular orientations (standing, mixed, and lying).
Fig. 4Charge transport energy levels in α-6T thin films.
a Ambient photoemission spectroscopy (APS) results for α-6T thin films with standing and lying orientations presenting an energy difference δ ~ 0.4 eV between their HOMO levels (referenced to the vacuum level). b Evolution of HOMO and LUMO levels calculated from embedded GW calculations for an interface between two domains with standing and lying α-6T molecules. Results are presented by progressively adding induction (dielectric response) and electrostatic intermolecular interactions to gas-phase levels. This shows that the offset δ between standing and lying molecules is entirely sourced by electrostatics. c Maps of the electrostatic potential illustrating the step-like variation across the standing-lying interface. d Sketch of the energy levels of standing and lying α-6T molecules, playing the role of electron donor and acceptor component, respectively.
Fig. 5Optical excitations from embedded Bethe–Salpeter calculations.
a Absorption spectrum of the standing–lying α-6T interface. Bar colours quantify the weight of inter-layer CT states of each excitation, showing that the lowest-energy region of the spectrum presents states that have a pronounced charge separation, with hole and electron localised in the standing and lying domains, respectively. The energy of these states with spatially separated charges is determined by the interfacial energy offset and can act as a gateway for an efficient charge splitting. b–d Electron–hole density plots and the corresponding simplified energy-level sketches of representative low-energy excitations.