Literature DB >> 32933919

Machine learning predicts stem cell transplant response in severe scleroderma.

Jennifer M Franks1,2, Viktor Martyanov1,2, Yue Wang1,2, Tammara A Wood1,2, Ashley Pinckney3, Leslie J Crofford4, Lynette Keyes-Elstein3, Daniel E Furst5, Ellen Goldmuntz6, Maureen D Mayes7, Peter McSweeney8, Richard A Nash8, Keith M Sullivan9, Michael L Whitfield10,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation (SCOT) trial demonstrated clinical benefit of haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) compared with cyclophosphamide (CYC). We mapped PBC (peripheral blood cell) samples from the SCOT clinical trial to scleroderma intrinsic subsets and tested the hypothesis that they predict long-term response to HSCT.
METHODS: We analysed gene expression from PBCs of SCOT participants to identify differential treatment response. PBC gene expression data were generated from 63 SCOT participants at baseline and follow-up timepoints. Participants who completed treatment protocol were stratified by intrinsic gene expression subsets at baseline, evaluated for event-free survival (EFS) and analysed for differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
RESULTS: Participants from the fibroproliferative subset on HSCT experienced significant improvement in EFS compared with fibroproliferative participants on CYC (p=0.0091). In contrast, EFS did not significantly differ between CYC and HSCT arms for the participants from the normal-like subset (p=0.77) or the inflammatory subset (p=0.1). At each timepoint, we observed considerably more DEGs in HSCT arm compared with CYC arm with HSCT arm showing significant changes in immune response pathways.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants from the fibroproliferative subset showed the most significant long-term benefit from HSCT compared with CYC. This study suggests that intrinsic subset stratification of patients may be used to identify patients with SSc who receive significant benefit from HSCT. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cyclophosphamide; systemic sclerosis; treatment

Year:  2020        PMID: 32933919     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  4 in total

1.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis: Yes!! BUT. . .

Authors:  Khitam A AlOdhaibi; John Varga; Daniel E Furst
Journal:  J Scleroderma Relat Disord       Date:  2020-11-18

2.  Clinical and Molecular Findings after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation or Cyclophosphamide for Scleroderma: Handling Missing Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  Lynette Keyes-Elstein; Ashley Pinckney; Ellen Goldmuntz; Beverly Welch; Jennifer M Franks; Viktor Martyanov; Tammara A Wood; Leslie Crofford; Maureen Mayes; Peter McSweeney; Richard Nash; George Georges; M E Csuka; Robert Simms; Daniel Furst; Dinesh Khanna; E William St Clair; Michael L Whitfield; Keith M Sullivan
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 3.  Precision medicine: the precision gap in rheumatic disease.

Authors:  Chung M A Lin; Faye A H Cooles; John D Isaacs
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 32.286

Review 4.  The Use and Utility of Machine Learning in Achieving Precision Medicine in Systemic Sclerosis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Francesco Bonomi; Silvia Peretti; Gemma Lepri; Vincenzo Venerito; Edda Russo; Cosimo Bruni; Florenzo Iannone; Sabina Tangaro; Amedeo Amedei; Serena Guiducci; Marco Matucci Cerinic; Silvia Bellando Randone
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.