Lori Uscher-Pines1, Jessica Sousa1, Pushpa Raja1, Ateev Mehrotra1, Michael L Barnett1, Haiden A Huskamp1. 1. RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia (Uscher-Pines), and Boston (Sousa); Greater Los Angeles Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles (Raja); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Mehrotra, Huskamp); Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Mehrotra); Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (Barnett).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many psychiatrists have rapidly transitioned to telemedicine. This qualitative study sought to understand how this dramatic change in delivery has affected mental health care, including modes of telemedicine psychiatrists used, barriers encountered, and future plans. The aim was to inform the ongoing COVID-19 response and pass on lessons learned to psychiatrists who are starting to offer telemedicine. METHODS: From March 31 to April 9, 2020, semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 outpatient psychiatrists practicing in five U.S. states with significant early COVID-19 activity. Inductive and deductive approaches were used to develop interview summaries, and a matrix analysis was conducted to identify and refine themes. RESULTS: At the time of the interviews, all 20 psychiatrists had been using telemedicine for 2-4 weeks. Telemedicine encompassed video visits, phone visits, or both. Although many continued to prefer in-person care and planned to return to it after the pandemic, psychiatrists largely perceived the transition positively. However, several noted challenges affecting the quality of provider-patient interactions, such as decreased clinical data for assessment, diminished patient privacy, and increased distractions in the patient's home setting. Several psychiatrists noted that their disadvantaged patients lacked reliable access to a smartphone, computer, or the Internet. Participants identified several strategies that helped them improve telemedicine visit quality. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has driven a dramatic shift in how psychiatrists deliver care. Findings highlight that although psychiatrists expressed some concerns about the quality of these encounters, the transition has been largely positive for both patients and physicians.
OBJECTIVE: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many psychiatrists have rapidly transitioned to telemedicine. This qualitative study sought to understand how this dramatic change in delivery has affected mental health care, including modes of telemedicine psychiatrists used, barriers encountered, and future plans. The aim was to inform the ongoing COVID-19 response and pass on lessons learned to psychiatrists who are starting to offer telemedicine. METHODS: From March 31 to April 9, 2020, semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 outpatient psychiatrists practicing in five U.S. states with significant early COVID-19 activity. Inductive and deductive approaches were used to develop interview summaries, and a matrix analysis was conducted to identify and refine themes. RESULTS: At the time of the interviews, all 20 psychiatrists had been using telemedicine for 2-4 weeks. Telemedicine encompassed video visits, phone visits, or both. Although many continued to prefer in-person care and planned to return to it after the pandemic, psychiatrists largely perceived the transition positively. However, several noted challenges affecting the quality of provider-patient interactions, such as decreased clinical data for assessment, diminished patient privacy, and increased distractions in the patient's home setting. Several psychiatrists noted that their disadvantaged patients lacked reliable access to a smartphone, computer, or the Internet. Participants identified several strategies that helped them improve telemedicine visit quality. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has driven a dramatic shift in how psychiatrists deliver care. Findings highlight that although psychiatrists expressed some concerns about the quality of these encounters, the transition has been largely positive for both patients and physicians.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Health care delivery; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Telepsychiatry
Authors: Ateev Mehrotra; Haiden A Huskamp; Jeffrey Souza; Lori Uscher-Pines; Sherri Rose; Bruce E Landon; Anupam B Jena; Alisa B Busch Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Donald M Hilty; Daphne C Ferrer; Michelle Burke Parish; Barb Johnston; Edward J Callahan; Peter M Yellowlees Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Anne Lambert-Kerzner; Charles Maynard; Marina McCreight; Amy Ladebue; Katherine M Williams; Kelty B Fehling; Steven M Bradley Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Meghan C Halley; Kusum S Mathews; Lisa C Diamond; Elizabeth Linos; Urmimala Sarkar; Christina Mangurian; Hala Sabry; Monika K Goyal; Kristan Olazo; Emily G Miller; Reshma Jagsi; Eleni Linos Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Henry Slone; Arianna Gutierrez; Caroline Lutzky; Demi Zhu; Hannah Hedriana; Janelle F Barrera; Samantha R Paige; Brian E Bunnell Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 11.225
Authors: Katherine J Holzer; Sunny S Lou; Charles W Goss; Jaime Strickland; Bradley A Evanoff; Jennifer G Duncan; Thomas Kannampallil Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 2.762